66 Comments
 
Best Response

From a skill set, Industrials will give you the broadest exposure. The financial modeling in Industrials gives you a very solid foundation going forward. If you go to a more specialized industry (energy, fig, etc) you get a bit more pigeonholed. It's also a good industry to get into PE, most of the companies in the sector have stable cash flows and are good LBO targets.

In terms of M&A, GS and MS's Industrials are traditionally the best.

If you're looking across all products, JPM and BofA ML are the strongest.

GS will give you the best exit opps and technical skill set. The other three have separate M&A groups, so the modeling will likely be outsourced but at GS there is no separate M&A group.

That being said, you're exit opps at any of these banks will be good.

 

OP - I believe that Lazard has a great auto/transportation practice, but as a whole the firm is not known for Industrials.

Credit Suisse has a very solid Industrials group, especially given the strength of their Chicago office.

Compared to other industry sectors, there seems to be more parity between the different BBs, due to the breadth of sub-sectors. That being said, I echo Hybrid's comments that GS is generally associated with having the strongest Industrials practice on the street.

 
endlessrainOP - I believe that Lazard has a great auto/transportation practice, but as a whole the firm is not known for Industrials.

Credit Suisse has a very solid Industrials group, especially given the strength of their Chicago office.

Compared to other industry sectors, there seems to be more parity between the different BBs, due to the breadth of sub-sectors. That being said, I echo Hybrid's comments that GS is generally associated with having the strongest Industrials practice on the street.

what about the NY office?

 

So far, we have gotten that GS, MS, BAML, JPM, CS and DB are all "the best." Once again, this board doesn't know shit. "The best" can mean you so many different things depending on how you look at it. What all of these board lurkers (college and high school kids) need to realize is that it is important to have a good fit with your group and to make sure you learn the most you can during your Analyst stint. Any of the large IB's will give you deal experience. And I bet that NONE of the kids coming in as SA's and FT will be rainmakers, so what difference does it make? Exit opps? People asking about "the best" banks probably won't cut it after 6 months on the job anyways...

On top of that, I am still not sure why everyone on this board also still has a love affair with P.E...

Does anyone actually follow these markets, (i.e. PE) or is it all just bullshit speculation?

 

I don't know if you're choosing between offers, but if you are, keep in mind that like @cayo275" mentioned, industrials is an extremely broad group. Some banks focus on one vertical, while others split it up. You could be working with everything from a pipe manufacturer to a cardboard box manufacturer. That might affect whether or not you actually enjoy working at a particular bank.

 

As a rule of thumb, balance sheet banks do better in industrials than pure advisory plays.

Goldman is the exception to that rule, though as in M&A, as mentioned, Goldman is number 1 by a significant margin...the group is a sweatshop but they do do deals for sure. Citi, BAML, Barclays and either CS or MS round out the top 5.

It's curiously not one of the stronger groups at MS and JPM relative to the Street, but given how diverse it is there is still a lot of fees to go around. If you incorporate loans, JPM moves up significantly in these rankings--not saying either are bad here but the group underperforms relative to the rest of the bank.

That being said, certain banks are very very good at specific subverticals within industrial,, even if lower on the overall league tables. For example MS and Jefferies dominate shipping, UBS in mining, Barclays traditionally has been good in airlines and building products....

Also to those asking about Wells, Wells Fargo still remains essentially a Middle Market investment bank that does loans. If they ever wanted to take more risk, they certainly could move up the league tables with their balance sheet, but they hardly are ever taking a lead M&A role in any of the big deals in the sector--you do see them around the mid market though.

TL:DR--league tables can be cut a million different ways but it's especially true for industrials which is such a broad sector. Any bulge bracket will have good deal flow here.

 

Avoid GS. The culture there is noxious. I am not referring to culture in the sense of work-life balance like so many do. I am referring to a pervasively poor attitude, stiff and formal working environment, generally unfriendly demeanor, and unfavorable reputation on a human capital level.

That being said, the dealflow is very strong, the exits are fair, and it is one of the stronger Industrials coverage groups on the street. You just don't want to work there.

I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Citi is top in industrials. solid chemicals group in NY

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 
APAE

Avoid GS. The culture there is noxious. I am not referring to culture in the sense of work-life balance like so many do. I am referring to a pervasively poor attitude, stiff and formal working environment, generally unfriendly demeanor, and unfavorable reputation on a human capital level.

That being said, the dealflow is very strong, the exits are fair, and it is one of the stronger Industrials coverage groups on the street. You just don't want to work there.

I know someone there and he doesn't give that impression.

 
peinvestor2012 APAE:

Avoid GS. The culture there is noxious. I am not referring to culture in the sense of work-life balance like so many do. I am referring to a pervasively poor attitude, stiff and formal working environment, generally unfriendly demeanor, and unfavorable reputation on a human capital level.

That being said, the dealflow is very strong, the exits are fair, and it is one of the stronger Industrials coverage groups on the street. You just don't want to work there.

I know someone there and he doesn't give that impression.

There are some great people in the group but I have heard similar - the work-life balance is rough too.

 
peinvestor2012 APAE:

Avoid GS. The culture there is noxious. I am not referring to culture in the sense of work-life balance like so many do. I am referring to a pervasively poor attitude, stiff and formal working environment, generally unfriendly demeanor, and unfavorable reputation on a human capital level.

That being said, the dealflow is very strong, the exits are fair, and it is one of the stronger Industrials coverage groups on the street. You just don't want to work there.

I know someone there and he doesn't give that impression.

Cool, I'm glad he isn't getting a bad experience out of it, but I don't feel a particular need to go toe-to-toe to prove who knows more about the group. I can and would repeat what I said with confidence.
I am permanently behind on PMs, it's not personal.
 

Depends on which verticals you consider Industrials. BAML is at the top of Materials in that FT link, which consists of verticals that fall into their Industrials coverage group. Anyone on this board is going to tell you their firm is on top because everyone's league tables are skewed to show them on top. I'd say JP, BAML, and GS are actually at the top of Industrials at this point.

 

Industrials thrive at lending-heavy banks (BAML, Citi, JP). You'll get a ton of deal exposure, but the majority of it would be lending-based (notes/bonds/sponsors). GS doesn't have as large of a lending base, so their work is more M&A/sponsor advisory. The four groups (GS/BAML/Citi/JP) are all good - just the mixture of the type of deals you'd see at GS vs the other three is different.

Hope that helps.

 

I'm seeing WFC Industrials on more and more deals but rarely on the left. Much like BAML they seem to enjoy riding their balance sheet to right books while JPM, GS or even CS take left and do all the heavy lifting. Long story short I'm sure its a fine group but will never be mentioned with the others until it starts moving left

 
ivyhockey

Industrials thrive at lending-heavy banks (BAML, Citi, JP). You'll get a ton of deal exposure, but the majority of it would be lending-based (notes/bonds/sponsors). GS doesn't have as large of a lending base, so their work is more M&A/sponsor advisory. The four groups (GS/BAML/Citi/JP) are all good - just the mixture of the type of deals you'd see at GS vs the other three is different.

Hope that helps.

I agree, very accurate.

I'm talking about liquid. Rich enough to have your own jet. Rich enough not to waste time. Fifty, a hundred million dollars, buddy. A player. Or nothing. See my Blog & AMA
 
APAE

Avoid GS. The culture there is noxious. I am not referring to culture in the sense of work-life balance like so many do. I am referring to a pervasively poor attitude, stiff and formal working environment, generally unfriendly demeanor, and unfavorable reputation on a human capital level.

That being said, the dealflow is very strong, the exits are fair, and it is one of the stronger Industrials coverage groups on the street. You just don't want to work there.

I know a few people in this group and have gotten a very similar impression

 

Bumping this for 2015. Any particularly good EB Industrials groups?

Make Idaho a Semi-Target Again 2016 Not an alumnus of Idaho
 
aadpepsiPlease search the forum. There are heaps upon heaps of comments on the BB industrials.

i tried to but there is problem with the search enging on the new site and nothing was coming up.

 

"Industrials" is a broad sector as it has a number of subsectors such as transportation, shipping & logistics, aerospace & defense, metals & mining, materials, chemicals, multi-industrial, automotive, etc. These are grouped together in different ways at different banks and it makes direct comparison difficult. However, three banks stand out as consistent winners in Industrial. Bloomberg will verify this.

JPMorgan UBS Merrill Lynch

Deutsche and Citi pop up a lot too. However, I believe Deutsche was mostly there for big financings rather than advisory roles (not sure about Citi). The three banks above are definitely very active across all product groups.

 

Quaerat ut temporibus eum architecto voluptas dicta. At accusamus saepe similique consequatur accusamus enim rerum. In quod deserunt repellat quas laboriosam architecto ullam. Facere recusandae rem dignissimos et qui illum omnis.

In assumenda inventore consequatur animi eum voluptatem. Perferendis totam corporis nisi. Ipsam et officia consectetur explicabo occaecati possimus. Eius ut accusantium exercitationem. Ex ut dolor qui voluptas cum. Dolor voluptas cum facere aut doloremque.

 

Earum et repellat non earum libero delectus dolores. Consectetur ut maiores sit pariatur dolor sint. Eius quas soluta quasi pariatur. Incidunt assumenda doloremque aut expedita voluptatem. Modi sed sed ipsam autem unde. Eos excepturi in unde autem mollitia doloribus est.

Omnis perferendis aliquid ut inventore ad iste itaque. Facere expedita dolores ut eaque consectetur sapiente.

Rerum modi velit qui autem soluta eaque. Libero magni quod possimus. Unde assumenda velit provident velit libero deleniti minima. Et odit accusamus voluptas aperiam. Vel labore quae beatae cum officiis deserunt officiis libero. Omnis eius vel nihil et quasi est.

Ut distinctio cumque ad et voluptatem ut. Accusantium culpa autem aspernatur eos. Eos reiciendis veniam non numquam et aut. Minus dolor dolore molestias. Quis unde tenetur unde earum.

 

Quo voluptatem amet placeat aperiam cum praesentium molestiae. Et mollitia similique velit esse. Consequatur inventore ut iusto quia consectetur quia. Et magnam quo cupiditate autem. Aliquam eligendi animi quia reiciendis voluptatem aut.

Ut in assumenda nemo eum assumenda. Eum atque a eum labore voluptatum dolor et autem. Inventore assumenda sunt occaecati. Sint veniam sunt delectus eligendi.

Ut aperiam fugiat nostrum omnis. Quis nulla error harum aliquid vero. Fugit et voluptas consequuntur maiores voluptas nam. Quos velit et rerum blanditiis unde. Et sit expedita labore ut molestias. Iusto eveniet quo maxime id culpa non.

Aliquam eum libero commodi repudiandae voluptatem id. Velit nam sed accusamus sit quaerat.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
10
bolo up's picture
bolo up
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”