DCF - Discounting Negative Free Cash Flows?

One common issue I run into when valuing companies with a DCF is when companies have negative unlevered free cash flows for the first few years of the projected period. Traditionally, you would discount all the forecasted years at some WACC with the appropriate discount factor based on the timeline for that respective cash flow. However, discounting the unlevered free cash flows that are negative seems like it would result in a DCF valuation that overvalues the company. What is the reasoning for discounting a cash flow that is negative and is there any alternatives to this?

For example, a company has projected unlevered free cash flows in years 1 – 5 of ($12.0), ($5.0), $5.0, $10.0, and $15.0, which leads to discounted (20.0% WACC) cash flows of ($10.0), ($3.5), $2.9, $4.8, and $6.0.

Empirically you wouldn’t pay ($10.0) dollars now to get back ($12.0) dollars 1 year from now. This is obviously a limitation of a traditional DCF model, but I want to better understand recommendations from thought leaders in this area.

5 Comments
 

Isn't losing money in the future better than losing it in the present? Would you rather realize a $10 loss today, or realize a $10 loss next year? It's the same logic as wanting $10 today vs $10 in the future, just reversed. If the underlying assumption is that money is less valuable in the future than it is today, you would rather lose it in the future than today. 

 

Negative cash is not workaround problem that “conveniently” lends itself to DCF math. It a business reality - the business will not function without cash. Factor in a cash raise via equity issuance or debt raise so that you are not cash negative. Yes, it will hurt returns via dilution or interest expense/leverage/covenants respectively, but that’s the realistic way to do it.

 

Hic deleniti tempore et eos et pariatur. Aut nostrum rerum nam porro fuga. Quo voluptatibus enim reiciendis nihil id illo saepe. Eligendi voluptates neque quidem.

Repellat nisi qui qui quos consectetur occaecati. Iste et et totam quis. Laboriosam harum accusantium ab consequatur necessitatibus ea voluptatum. Inventore autem repellendus ipsam eum corrupti possimus. Dolorem voluptas ipsum sapiente.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”