Guggenheim Partners Insight?

Any insight towards the best groups and Analyst compensation for Guggenheim in their different coverage teams (eg. Restructuring or TMT)?

How are the exit opps as well as the workload compared to other banks? I've heard not great, but I want to get feedback from all of you.

119 Comments
 

Are you interviewing for FT or SA? I just applied for a summer position and the only open opportunities were in ER or S&T. Wondering if I may have missed the IB or AM deadlines/if they even offer summer positions in those divisions.

 

Getting better and PE is becoming more of a sure thing. The bank is one of the hottest on the street, and as dealflow improves, so will analyst experiences. They don't have a ton of alums in PE, but I noticed a couple notables in Welsh Carson and Castle Harlan. It's certainly not going to give you the options of a BB or even a Jefferies at the moment, but in 12-18 months when you'll actually be recruiting, I bet that the exit opps at Guggenheim will have improved immensely compared to now.

 

Just signed an SA offer with Gugg, and from what the people there told me, the senior bankers there are all very helpful in going to bat for you regarding exit opps. And since they're continuing to poach some of the top bankers on the street, there will definitely be some good networking opportunities going forward.

 

JacOffasour, add me. I can't help you but I'd like to know if you got the job sometime when you find out, around when is your interview?

 

Do you have anyone in your network who works for them?

CalnusThey were a client of ours but I only know tidbits. They've really been ramping up efforts for their AM side. From what I could tell they were entrepreneural and smart guys. Not sure on culture as only met some of them in client meetings. They also contacted me for interview next week.
 
CalnusThey were a client of ours but I only know tidbits. They've really been ramping up efforts for their AM side. From what I could tell they were entrepreneural and smart guys. Not sure on culture as only met some of them in client meetings. They also contacted me for interview next week.

Thanks, good luck on your interview!

 

I have been thinking about applying there - but there hasn't been anything posted recently that I am interested in. From what I have gleaned from their website and talk around my office, they seem like a great firm.

 

Speaking only on Guggenheim IBD:

I knew someone from my school working there now and I spoke with a couple others there (junior and senior levels) before too. They're definitely very well respected and give good amount of meaningful work even at the analyst level (At least as meaningful IBD could get at the junior level). Work hours may be bad but honestly, where would the hours AT IBD ever be considered "good?" Maybe the difference could be 100 vs. 110 hours per week but that'd already be at a point where the difference wouldn't matter all that much. Plus they did advise on the Verizon-vodafone deal which was among the largest deals in history. Senior employees also come from very respectable backgrounds.

In terms of exit opps, nobody I know who joined Guggenheim has left yet, and I think this might be sure to the fact thats its IBD arm is still relatively new; it only really took off around 2009. In fact aside from the person from my school, everyone else I knew who joined actually had experience at a BB first, and joined to help grow the company.

 

I'm still in school but from my understanding they are the place to be. Growing firm that wants to attract top young talent. Definitely an awesome place to land after college.

Any ideas on how many offers the LA office gave??

 
OMSu jelly?

Haha I am! I know friends that went to superday in LA office. nothing but good experiences from what they said. Also know that Guggenheims Vice Chairman is in the LA office and an ex-Goldman partner/MD. Other MD came from Moelis i believe?

Sounds like their analysts will get some sick senior exposure...and some big cocks rammed up their asses along the way. Yummmmmmmm.

 

^what has been read cannot be unread...

Disclaimer for the Kids: Any forward-looking statements are solely for informational purposes and cannot be taken as investment advice. Consult your moms before deciding where to invest.
 

I went to their superday on Friday. Honestly, I have interviewed with BX, Laz, Evercore, BAML, GS, and Greenhill and none of them impressed me like the guys from Guggenheim did.

They are really awesome people, have worked on some great deals (dodgers, cablevision etc) but I am not sure about how other more established people in the industry view them.

They are not trying to be a boutique and only focus on advisory but are more so trying to become the new Bear Stearns. The were firm on the belief that gugg would be a full service investment bank and I think Alan is the guy to lead them there.

Not saying I would take the offer over BB or elite boutiques but it is very interesting. I'm sure there was this type of skepticism when the other top boutiques were starting out but look how that turned out.

"Look, you're my best friend, so don't take this the wrong way. In twenty years, if you're still livin' here, comin' over to my house to watch the Patriots games, still workin' construction, I'll fuckin' kill you. That's not a threat, that's a fact.
 
Will HuntingI went to their superday on Friday. Honestly, I have interviewed with BX, Laz, Evercore, BAML, GS, and Greenhill and none of them impressed me like the guys from Guggenheim did.

They are really awesome people, have worked on some great deals (dodgers, cablevision etc) but I am not sure about how other more established people in the industry view them.

They are not trying to be a boutique and only focus on advisory but are more so trying to become the new Bear Stearns. The were firm on the belief that gugg would be a full service investment bank and I think Alan is the guy to lead them there.

Not saying I would take the offer over BB or elite boutiques but it is very interesting. I'm sure there was this type of skepticism when the other top boutiques were starting out but look how that turned out.

Wow. thanks for sharing, this is good.

How would exit opps look in your opinion? would it be more MDs and senior guys pushing to contacts for their analysts? Or do you think headhunters would reach out to Guggenheim like they do for other top shops?

Also did you have the superday with their NY office? Congrats on those interviews as well, those are all amazing!!

 
Will HuntingI went to their superday on Friday. Honestly, I have interviewed with BX, Laz, Evercore, BAML, GS, and Greenhill and none of them impressed me like the guys from Guggenheim did.

They are really awesome people, have worked on some great deals (dodgers, cablevision etc) but I am not sure about how other more established people in the industry view them.

They are not trying to be a boutique and only focus on advisory but are more so trying to become the new Bear Stearns. The were firm on the belief that gugg would be a full service investment bank and I think Alan is the guy to lead them there.

Not saying I would take the offer over BB or elite boutiques but it is very interesting. I'm sure there was this type of skepticism when the other top boutiques were starting out but look how that turned out.

Hmmm... which office did you interview with? I also interviewed with GS, BX, HL FRG etc They made me an early offer late July but I was not impressed with the people from their LA office at all...

 
Will HuntingI went to their superday on Friday. Honestly, I have interviewed with BX, Laz, Evercore, BAML, GS, and Greenhill and none of them impressed me like the guys from Guggenheim did.

They are really awesome people, have worked on some great deals (dodgers, cablevision etc) but I am not sure about how other more established people in the industry view them.

They are not trying to be a boutique and only focus on advisory but are more so trying to become the new Bear Stearns. The were firm on the belief that gugg would be a full service investment bank and I think Alan is the guy to lead them there.

Not saying I would take the offer over BB or elite boutiques but it is very interesting. I'm sure there was this type of skepticism when the other top boutiques were starting out but look how that turned out.

Agreed. I had a superday w/the LA office but was unable to receive an offer. Had i been given the opportunity though i would have probably taken it over the other top MM i took or even the lower tier BB offer i had (ex- baml, Citi, UBS).

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 

Does anyone on this forum have any idea what they are talking about? They've placed 1 analyst into PE ever. Deal flow is majority pitching. Not where you want to be right now, maybe in a few years though. Be wary of the advice you get here (my post included).

 
pokemansDoes anyone on this forum have any idea what they are talking about? They've placed 1 analyst into PE ever. Deal flow is majority pitching. Not where you want to be right now, maybe in a few years though. Be wary of the advice you get here (my post included).

OMS is a Certified User. You have 11points

I mean...il take his word over urs. You seem bitter lol

Jelly bro?

 

I have an interview coming up with these guys as well. Have been really impressed with them so far, and seems to be small shop but actively getting involved in big names. Any idea on culture (hours, dress, relationships with mgmt) to comp and headcount.

 

Solid firm, especially active in securitization markets. Yes, they did do the Dodgers deal, however keep in mind that the firm's holding company was also the buyer. The firm is historically and primarily in the high net worth advisory and Asset Management businesses, but that said the IB arm is certainly growing.

I don't think a comparison to either the lower bulge-bracket firms or the independent M&A advisors makes particular sense; Guggenheim seems to be charting its own course as a smaller, higher-touch full service investment bank.

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 

I know guys who lateraled there. Its better than the hurting BB, most of them left after a year or two to do standard banking exits. no real opportunity to go over to the AM side.

 

Positives: Incredible exposure to senior bankers. Peter Comisar head of consumer group and vice chairman of Guggenheim located in SM office.

Great growth potential, increased responsibility, possibility off adding more coverage groups to SM office in upcoming years.

Office is dope... working long hours has got to be a lot easier when you have a panoramic view of the pacific ocean.

Negatives: Still working on brand name.

Tough competition for deals (altho got the true religion one today)

LA isnt SF or NYC when it comes to banking

I'd be stoked if I got an offer...

 
HarvardOrBustIf you took Gugg over Citi or BAML because of what you perceive on this website you should probably kill yourself. Deal flow at either two banks would destroy whatever Gugg gets.

I'm going to a top boutique in SF and old got the first round at Guggenheim, so i didnt even progress in the process

and to comment on your unreasonably bitter remark, the way BAML is downsizing its IB division: [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/20/bank-of-america-layoffs-16000_…
http://www.foxbusiness.com/industries/2012/09/20/report-BofA-planning-to-lay-off-16000-workers/ http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/20/business/la-fi-bofa-layoffs-201…]

and how Citi just lost its CEO (this actually could be a good thing bcuz of the controversy surrounding Pandit and how he did...i'll give you Citi vs Guggenheim as a tip of the scale towards Citi)

i dont think its "worth killing myself" over joining Guggenheim over a declining BB. a few years ago noone heard of Moelis and know they are a powerhouse. same can be said about Greenhill when they started

again, BAML and Citi do have their reasons to join too but i would rather join a growing boutique being led by ex partners and ex CEOs and ex Co-Heads of global M&A/Media from JPM than take the risk of joining a BB that tends to ALWAYS OVER FIRE AND OVER HIRE.

but thts just me. i appreciate your thoughts too, no need to get hostile.

 

Lol you point to one bank laying off and think that's the only bank doing it. Take a look across the street -- everyone is laying off, not just BAML. And you think Moelis is killing it?? Can you name me five notable deals they've worked on YTD? I would say there's room for independent advisors, but nowadays it's about whos got the balance sheet.

 
Best Response
HarvardOrBustLol you point to one bank laying off and think that's the only bank doing it. Take a look across the street -- everyone is laying off, not just BAML. And you think Moelis is killing it?? Can you name me five notable deals they've worked on YTD? I would say there's room for independent advisors, but nowadays it's about whos got the balance sheet.

You're missing a huge piece of the picture. The firms with the most balance-sheet aren't justifying their cost of equity. Basel III and SIFI capitalization regulations offer no relief. Loss-leading lending therefore has a declining viability. They will all shrink headcount, because you can't grow revenue per employee by lending in this environment.

The proof is in the pudding. Lazard, Centerview, and Evercore are all growing their core recruiting school list. Goldman, Deutsche Bank, and the others are cutting core schools.

"There are three ways to make a living in this business: be first, be smarter, or cheat."
 
HarvardOrBustLol you point to one bank laying off and think that's the only bank doing it. Take a look across the street -- everyone is laying off, not just BAML. And you think Moelis is killing it?? Can you name me five notable deals they've worked on YTD? I would say there's room for independent advisors, but nowadays it's about whos got the balance sheet.

okay so all the bbs are falling to shit. the exact reason why they are cutting down is because of their over levered balance sheets and their over hiring and high expenses (salaries!) with non profitable prop trading

irregardless of all that- i stated "Moelis is killing it":

this means that Moelis is expanding, Moelis is paying above street (70K base, 10k signing, middle bucket was 65K and top bucket was 75K performance bonus), they are developing GREAT relationships with target schools for future recruitment, they SUPPORT their analysts to get buy side positions, and are placing very well into buy side

if you want to work for the name on the card, go to a BB. if you want an experience at a firm that probably pays more, will not fire you based solely on market cyclical in a panic, is not shunning you for wanting to go to buyside...hell they help you with it! then that is what i mean by Moelis is killing it

let me preface that many people did not even get FT offers this year so congrats to those that did and anything is good in this market, BB or not, thankful for what i/everyone can get full time.

 
lasampdoriaHave an interview next month in LA.

Major non-target in SoCal

for the AM division or IB? just asking bcuz your profile says AM intern..

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 

I would be interested to hear of any potential exit opps as well. Small firm but strong and seasoned bankers. One might think that the MDs would go to bat for their analysts, but I haven't a clue.

 
TableTopperI would be interested to hear of any potential exit opps as well. Small firm but strong and seasoned bankers. One might think that the MDs would go to bat for their analysts, but I haven't a clue.

when i had their superday, this is what they told me would happen- MDs would go to bat (and i feel there could be validity to this being that the MDs i found on linkedin right now are all seasoned bankers from JPM/Bear Sterns or other top BBs/elite boutiques) if headhunters dont place analysts well enough...i wouldnt knw personally though, sorry...

id recommend making a new thread since no one seems to be responding lol

I don't throw darts at a board. I bet on sure things. Read Sun-tzu, The Art of War. Every battle is won before it is ever fought- GG
 
karyptoForbes January 17th Edition

...legit

I would pay you to rephrase that whole thing. I don't understand jack squat of it... lol

And are you asking like which city for division?? If yes, New York. If not, what?

EDIT: IBD? maybe?

It's what you put into it
 

Had some early interviews with them but ultimately accepted elsewhere (and withdrew from final rounds). I assume we are taking about IBD but Guggenheim is definitely legit, sounds like a good work environment (employees are friendly and excited about the future of the firm) with a lot of ex-BearStearns/JPM guys trying to build something new.

They definitely are not on the level of Greenhill, Moelis, Centerview as a boutique, but I think that is eventually the goal of the organization.

 
HeyBlondie

I want to do S&T (specifically sales). I would love to work for Guggenheim Partners, because privately held, $$$ AUM, great salary, HQ in LA, great compensation, relaxing atmosphere, flexibility, etc. However, my best friend works at GP, and in all honesty, I wouldn't want to work under her (an opportuntity for awkward tension). Plus, it's sort of like sharing a dorm with your best friend in college--i.e. too much of a good thing, is never good. Anyway, I love her firm and just curious to know if there are similar firms out there? Relatively new to the game, so I'd appreciate the candid advice.

This is very odd. First, why does it matter how much AUM if you want to work in a sell side role (I'm guessing the sell side division of this legacy hedge fund). Second, this is not the best idea. Why would another buyside firm trust there is a real Chinese wall here between the hedge fund and the S&T side? Third, how do you know what the compensation is like? Fourth, are you sure you want to work East coast hours in LA? Fifth, why would you want to work on a sell side desk that is relaxed? There is likely very little flow if its truly so relaxed. Sixth, why would you NEED to work directly under your friend? Do they run only one team of sales people for every single asset class and product?

Sounds like you should rethink this whole thing.

 

Thanks for the input, but I should have better explained myself. First, I referred to the AUM as to suggest this firm is a very respected firm in LA and enjoys a certain level of prestige. Second, your comment confuses me. GP is an investment bank--not a hedge fund. Third, I asked my friend. Fourth, yes. I'm a morning person and I love CA. Not planning to move to NY any time soon (as in never). Fifth, in comparison to NY firms, CA firms enjoy more of a "beach/relaxing" life style. This does not mean that they don't work hard. Instead, it merely means that the "vibe" is different. For instance, I used to work for a large PE firm in CA and a friend worked in a similar gig in NY. She worked until 10 pm everyday whereas I got in the office around 8 and left around 6, usually to go to dinner with clients. I didn't need to wear a stuffy suit, but she did. I could have more leeway in terms of "how" I completed my work. Six, she works on the sell-side and in one capacity or another, I would either work under her or take orders. Plus, it's like living and working with your significant other. Sure you love them, but do you really want to see them ALL day, every day. Further, I'm sorta stubborn and independent and want to do "my own thing." I don't want to steal her thunder and ruin her gig at GP.

Sarah Ashley
 

IBs do not specifically have AUM. Only asset managers (likely Guggenheim's AM arm), HFs, the like. Also, I am not an expert on culture divides of the east and west, but I think you are generalizing in the culture of the two coasts. Have read a lot of firms on the WC that can be just as or more conservative than east.

Also, just because your friend works at GP doesn't mean that you'll work with them. Unless the position you are applying for is in her division? GP (from what I understand), is a decent sized company and not one where you can count its employees on your fingers.

"History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme."
 
HeyBlondie

I want to do S&T (specifically sales). I would love to work for Guggenheim Partners, because privately held, $$$ AUM, great salary, HQ in LA, great compensation, relaxing atmosphere, flexibility, etc. However, my best friend works at GP, and in all honesty, I wouldn't want to work under her (an opportuntity for awkward tension). Plus, it's sort of like sharing a dorm with your best friend in college--i.e. too much of a good thing, is never good. Anyway, I love her firm and just curious to know if there are similar firms out there? Relatively new to the game, so I'd appreciate the candid advice.

Small world - we know each other (vaguely). With that, I will try to address your concerns from what I know about you.

The typical "entry points" into an investment banking career are through either undergrad OCR or b-school OCR. It's difficult enough to break into IB from even a top-tier undergrad/b-school (most applicants obviously get turned down), but doing so outside of the typical and highly institutionalized recruiting pipeline is *highly improbable. IBs don't tend to post job vacancies on their website or Monster.com. Not sure if you were aware of this, but you should be.

*With that said, you have no relevant experience in IB or S&T, but you will be competing with lateral hires form other banks that do have relevant experience (ding). I thought about recommending you to talk to recruiters that specialize in finance, but I honestly don't think they will spend their time helping you over more qualified candidates.

*You currently work for a PE/VC firm and you want to want to work in IB. Typically, it works the other way around - most IB employees try to exit into a PE/VC firm, not the other way around. I suggest you have a good story to explain why (and saying that you are unsatisfied with your current employer will probably not fly, as most IB employees are pretty unsatisfied with their job, but stay anyway). Consider this a ding if you don't have a convincing story.

*Your academic background and work history suggest that you are not sure with what you want to do (another ding). You majored in bio, then decided not to pursue a career in biology, and then went to law school, then decided not to pursue a career in law, and ended up at a PE/VC firm. Now you would like to pursue a career in investment banking. Think about how that would come off to a potential recruiter. You may be sure about what you want to do, but there is no way you can convey that in a resume (or even in a cover letter, people only read that after they see your resume). Again, you will want to have a story to explain all this.

TLDR version - don't bother. I know this isn't what you want to hear, but it's what you need to hear. The IB industry will bitch-slap you with cold, hard truth daily, so you might as well get used to it now. Good luck.

Man made money, money never made the man
 

alan schwartz brought in a lot of his team from bear. they're growing and should be especially strong in media in the coming years

wouldn't put them at elite boutique but could be up there soon

 

Quae assumenda id est et molestiae voluptatem sapiente. Praesentium ad voluptatum adipisci in. Corrupti earum voluptatum aperiam est et reprehenderit. Sed id sit et sed.

Ab sapiente explicabo qui laboriosam porro ea. Est fugit laboriosam possimus qui voluptatem dolore ipsa. Est fugit excepturi laboriosam cum perferendis.

 

Ut minus ab libero voluptates. Et iusto sit illo corporis dolores voluptates aut. Et repudiandae beatae a dolores nesciunt. Et autem quibusdam numquam ab vel qui. Qui est laborum voluptates quibusdam aut aut.

Omnis eveniet itaque ipsum et. At aperiam voluptas omnis. Sit omnis magni quia maxime. Voluptatum odit qui impedit doloribus pariatur.

Odit omnis ex totam. Praesentium dolor ratione et quis.

Non omnis quasi aliquid. Atque aut qui blanditiis veniam.

 

Possimus a mollitia quasi aliquam animi et vitae aut. Ipsum blanditiis temporibus culpa laborum vel temporibus ab similique. Ut error et consequatur voluptatem necessitatibus laborum. Qui aut dolores quis et enim. Ea cupiditate molestiae aut dicta doloribus blanditiis dolores voluptates. Suscipit est quo accusantium nemo porro.

At impedit et aut repellendus aperiam magni corrupti. Est excepturi ut neque eligendi sit. Nihil odit voluptate iusto harum dignissimos officiis doloremque. Tenetur aperiam quia ab. Animi temporibus iure debitis voluptatum nisi amet.

 

Quis magnam tenetur minus delectus nihil sit. Rerum aut dicta tempora ut minus aut laudantium. Aliquid ducimus architecto ea ipsa labore excepturi nemo.

Officia neque nobis corporis quam labore. Qui facilis tempora modi sint. Id omnis adipisci beatae libero dolorum ipsam.

Repellat provident est voluptates ut sint quibusdam quia. Optio atque laudantium dolorem distinctio. Qui quae quasi perspiciatis dolor.

Qui dolores voluptas nihil similique. Aut quisquam illum asperiores aspernatur qui. Repudiandae possimus ratione omnis labore et numquam.

 

Dolorem quam eius sed enim fugiat. Atque inventore quo autem optio reiciendis similique omnis vel. Occaecati placeat maxime voluptatem asperiores. Ut atque voluptatibus deserunt culpa voluptas.

Asperiores cupiditate quis consequuntur cum aut corporis. Animi sapiente voluptatem reiciendis dolor. Est sunt nobis quod molestiae dolor enim. Veritatis eos id magni odio magni.

Eos eius sunt qui veritatis dolore ipsum. Eveniet impedit repellat soluta laboriosam placeat. Velit aperiam dolores et vel. Dicta laudantium nam cum voluptatem vero nulla.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (65) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”