Why are so many finance firm founders Jewish?

Broooo that’s a crazy chirp

I appreciate your attempt to actually answer the question with any kind of coherent thought. With that said, I think the biggest factor is simply the post ww2 Jewish network that has been entrenched in US finance, Hollywood etc. I don't necessarily think there's anything wrong with it and given the post war circumstances I think it was inevitable. You can see similar networks at play in Tech w/ east Asians or other ethnic groups in less important industries (e.g. every dunkin, burger king, popeyes etc. in nyc being run by south Asians lol). Ultimately I don't think the ethnicity matters all that much as long as the overall process of starting an enterprise or rising through the ranks of one remains a meritocracy. To what degree that is the case today can certainly be argued, but it's improved materially since the 1980's and especially the 50's. During the same time however it's become much harder to create the kind of firms mentioned in the OP without significant connections to the established leaders which creates a positive feedback loop further entrenching ethnic networks (in this case Jewish).   

44% percent of adults in the US have an undergraduate degree. 60% across the world excluding 3rd world countries.

Elaborate more. 

What's your take on Gaza and Palestine conflict ? Any opinions on the situation in the Middle East and MAGA ? 

.

Unironically not wrong as due to antisemitism Jews all across Europe and MENA went into the field of financing and commerce. Mizrachi Jewish merchants/traders were the first people to come up with Letters of Credit as it greatly reduced the risk and problem of being robbed of all of your gold and silver when traveling from trade city to trade city. Bandits wanted gold, not heavy merchandise that they have to sell. Paper LOC was invented as a result.

Thank you for the smart comment, but plenty of Jews have fucked me over. Plenty of shady Jews unfortunately. 

key words "other jews"

BENJAMIN NETANYAHU GIVE ME A SA 2027 JANE STREET STRATEGY AND PRODUCT INTERNSHIP! I AM KISSING THE WALL!

There’s also a matter of excellence. If you look at the list, these aren’t just any random firms or funds. They are literally the best of the best, which is what our Jewish mothers teach us to try to be. While you’re at it, check out the Nobel prize rates of Jews vs everyone else, we punch above our weight class bc that’s what our mothers teach us.

No lies spoken. Once there is a hint of you being Jewish, you get direct referrals from the C-suite and HR directly emails you first without you even submitting your resume. 
Speaking from personal experience.

Edit: someone MS'ed as inaccurate on how I personally got an interview. 💀

What precisely does the book explore? Is it into (responsible) conspiracy theorising?

Just work harder incel

that doesn't really explain the phenomenon (except for maybe Goldman, given that like 90% of their CEOs were Jewish). Almost all of these firms were founded by Jews, so it isn't like some nepotism was in play

Director in CorpFin

In-group preference. Everyone does it blatantly except whites.

“In” group preference propelled the world’s most starkly “out” group into the halls of power. Get real - that’s a nonsensical answer for how these firms got established

.

That it concerns the Zio ethnicity that controls speech censorship in the westernised world for, some reason😒, doesn't make it pathetic, stop being a silly snow flake. This is literally a finance website; so, it's weird this topic doesn't appear exponentially more frequently than this

In summary, like the propaganda agent Xuequin Jiang rightly said: "whoever you're not allowed to question is who is ruling you". Period. They write the censorship rules for government, that's why the occultic elite among them create mechaniss  brainwash everyone into thinking it's immoral to notice what should be common sense to notice.

Outside finance, and in academic fields of history, it is very ACADEMICALLY routine for History professors to critically question massive casualty figures claimed in any ancient/literary text or record; but somehow, using critical thinking & re-examining the casualty figures of a certin ethnicity allegedly massacred at an unreal scale, at the hands of a certain German moustache man, lands you in jail (& will probably get this comment deleted)—such a disproportionate response just for the normal reseach procedure of critically questioning casualty figures (whether technically correct or not is besides the point)—that should be more than enough to tell any adult brain that most conspiracy theories associated with such an ethnicity must have substantial element of truth—hence the overly hysterical disproportionate censorship

American society doesn't exist at all.  The groups that do have a strong sense of it Jews as you pointed out, but also certian armenians, gujrati Indians (Patels in particular), Hakka Chinese (in South East Asia though not the US) Maronite Lebanese Christians, do extrodinarily well in the US because network effects compound.  

The only way you can survive long term in the US, as in having your blood line propogate, is by having a tribal community within the civic structure of America.  

The elite WASPS degenerated, and mass white america never had anything like this.  FDR saved them with the New Deal, but now that population is going back to their condition as it was in this country outside of FDRs intervention, essential serfdom.  

Atheist Whites, and assimilated white like minorities will realize the utter terror of being a non networked, non identity bearing population in a multipolar, possibly Chinese dominated globe very soon.  

Clan up or go extinct.

C'est La Vie.

Literally was going to mention Mormons as well, it seems stronger than most racial in-groups, but it's not as strong as Jewish ties. 

Chinese people absolutely don't give a shit about each other. Indian people do and will form in-groups but it's not a sacred cow and tensions can arise along caste / regional divides.

Works at Citadel Investment Group

The Jews are the only socioeconomically privileged group that acts with group solidarity to promote their interests. It is unacceptable to even point out that you are not allowed to point out this privilege. With any other group, it is the opposite. Discrimination by Jews in favor of Jews is widely accepted and tolerated; it is considered bigoted to question this practice. For example at the bank I worked at, the only time off for personal reasons I consistently saw respected was Jewish holidays including each and every one of the very minor ones. They of course also got off the Christian holidays too. You of course cannot mention such a thing since that would be deeply wrong to say. 

The only times I have ever had a comment I’ve made on this site banned was when I dared question anything to do with a conflict going on associated with this group. Obviously they are completely innocent and justified (please don’t ban my post this time lmao). But in either case the response to this and my re-education actually for me at least was a visceral feel as to what solidarity looks like. 

The other big thing is that the closest thing we have elsewhere to this level of solidarity amongst an elite group it not a cultural or spiritual tie. For example, going to Yale or something is somewhat similar to being Jewish since you do have affinity. But here the tie is one that joins a far larger group of people together due to shared culture. The Jews are remarkable since they generally secular but they seem to retain the sociocultural benefits of being religious. The only other groups that have this often are religious, which is typically associated essentially with not being successful. In New York, the only religious people I met were homeless or schizophrenic. There really are very few exceptions (most tightly knit religious groups tend to be poor, with the exception of perhaps the Mormons as another example). Aside from the Mormons, the Jews are the only group that is successful that retains the bonds of religious belief. 

In finance in particular, it’s probably because there’s a lot of Jews in New York and it just so happens not as many Mormons. The Mormons often have many of these characteristics too, but another thing with Jews is the ones in New York tend not to have 10 kids, so they have more time to grind than Mormons. 

There’s other cultural groups that do help each other out but not quite in the same way. Chinese and Indian people do not really share the same bonds in the same way. Chinese people are mostly secular and at leas in my experience they don’t help one another simply because another person is Chinese. Indian people that are successful tend to be secular but like the Jews they do often retain cultural affiliations. That said, I don’t think they help each other in finance. In the tech industry I do think they do help each other but not in the way you’d think. Successful Indians that are not h1b and have lived here for some time tend to lose their loyalty to their own group since they tend to no longer participate in the same cultural rituals after being acculturated if they achieve material success. H1b people often do retain cultural stuff but they are essentially a modern versus of slavery-lite, they don’t really have much power or influence. In other words, I really do think what makes the Jews unique is that they retain a genuine cultural bond that is religion like without having its downsides (becoming poor or backwards) while also being an incredibly privileged group on average (while simultaneously making it faux pas to ever point that out). 
 
This is all btw in the context of a society where people don’t really have any real affiliations. People don’t go to church and we barely let people have a frat anymore in college. Any group of men collecting together for some reason probably is up to no good. Generally people don’t know their neighbors and have few friends. The bar for standing out in this respect is not really all that high so of course here the Jews stand out. 

Also for what it’s worth even pointing out any of this is considered deeply offensive but we are allowed to point this out about straight people, men or white people. Because I have given an analysis here I will likely get quite a lot of monkey shit, which I think emphasizes my point. Even suggesting 1/2 of what I suggested here would label me an anti-Semite which I am not. I already know I will get a lot of monkey shit and frankly hate here, but I mean that’s sort of my point. 

zero lies told

.

Ah bro good to see you here again!

I totally agree, but I don't think atheistic whites, and whitewashed minorities realize the position they're going to be in soon as the world veers into a China influenced multipolar system.  

Identity will become important again, it always was, but american hegenomy allowed for people here to get a little comfortable and soft.  They developed an atomized, individualistic culture with lofty naive views.  

Not trying to doom or gloom, but this is the exact class (The song dynasty urban individualists, Abbasid court families, etc..) that gets absolutely annihilated whenever hegenomic orders shift.  Non networked legacy populations of declining empires get wiped out every single time, if you take a look at history and see exactly who lost when Rome Fell, The Abbasids fell, the Song dynasty fell etc...

The WASPS declined after HW Bush for a couple of reasons.  

1.  War driven institutional strength.  The William Fullbrights, the Nelson Rockefellers, HW Bush.  They served in some capacity in ww2, and that made them mature and strong anchors in their community.  Because they had been comfortable for a long time and didn't have to survive the holocaust (jews), all sorts of 3rd world disasters and poverty (Rest of us minorities), they didn't pass that down to their sons.  Case in Point HW Bush, to W Bush, an immense amount was lost in that transition alone if you read their biographies and know old money wasps who were in the Bushes social circles.
2. Strange anti wealth culture.  Averell Harriman was the heir to one of the largest railroad fortunes at the turn of the 20th century.  He didn't bother managing his businesses, and went into public service, being part of FDRs war cabinet, and consequently an elder statesmen like figure who advised multiple democrats for the twilight years of his life.  In the WASP world you were supposed to judge whether others had money, while also being nonchalant about it.  Consequently, they all got outcompeted by Jewish American/Minorities in general.  Banking pre 1975 was sleepy because the WASP gentlemen were expected to not work lol.  Obviously they were going to decline.
3. General Anglo naiveity.  You see this in the anglosphere, but not in continental europe for whatever reason.  

THIS.  Even in Canada - this mentality has let the Panjabis who are absolutely alien to the land and have nothing to do with it - usurp their lands. Now the towelheads even are Members of Parliament n shiz

One of the greatest cultural formations in powered circles human existence has seen, only the Sogdians in History have matched this.

Dude NGAF about Canada. This post was about Jews dominance in finance, which for the most part is concentrated in the US (but even in EU, Jews have and frankly still are dominating the finance industry)