GS Layoffs hit NY

Any details? Groups, level?

Summary 

TMT: 12 Across NY and SF

FIG: ~10% of FIG

HC: 7+ Asso/ VPs

CRG: 1 VP, 2 associates, 1 analyst

IND: 2 ASO, 3 VP, 1 MD

HK: 25+ bankers 

5+ Associates across all Classic groups; including As1’s

“Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% "bottom performer" cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they're trying to spin it)”

“I'm pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I've put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I'm going to start looking around”

179 Comments
 

Well one person said in another thread a couple analysts found out the hard way when their card access no longer worked and security escorted them...

 

wtf that's so spinless, literally so fucked. Could they not just send an email? Or an in-person sit-down? massive cowards. literally cowardice by those who run the organization is the only excuse. Oh wahh is baby too scared of a little confrontation from their employee?

Need to start asking company leaders in interviews "how would you handle layoffs? or a situation in which layoffs might occur?"

 

This sounds like this can't possibly be right. Who in their right mind would terminate an employee in this manner? Unless you thought there was a security/physical threat, they know they would receive tremendous negative blowback (not that they would care in the long run) if they terminated this way. I mean, for all the shit Goldman gets, is there nobody decent in the higher-ups/HR that would say, "No, this is the wrong way to do it, the decent thing to do is to call him/her in, have a brief discussion and send them on their way."  I know it's possible, but was the winning philosophy really, "F that, let's just deactivate their keycards, totally ghost the F  outta them and maybe send them their belongings"? 

 

Ha, I wrote the post above you, and even I think your response is funny. Look, I know they're the Evil Empire and all, but still, you would think they would show a sliver of compassion.  (can't give you a "banana" because I'm apparently out of them, or something like that). 

 

Guy has a point. Grinding analysts to the bone, GS 13, protected Saturdays, massive lateral hiring, massive cold firing…all in 18 months. Seems fucked

 

this shit pisses me off. knowing that those kids likely just wanted to have a good summer experience and learn about the industry but got absolutely destroyed instead is unacceptable

 

For every employee that gets thrown out the door like Jazzy Jeff:

jazzy jeff

You got 10 hardos lining up and drooling at the thought of getting used and abused. GS can do what they want.

 

And it's at every level. Not just front office. Have seen people take pretty sh*tty back office jobs there just for the brand name. And I admit it, the one person I'm thinking of - the brand name did help them in the long term once they left the big banks and entered more of a boutique firm environment (for clients and employers, Goldman's name does carry a "prestige" factor).

 

pretty much - GS has always looked out for GS but they always have a line of wannabe simps lining outside the door no matter what they do.  5 days a week back at work, horrible hours, comp usually not great (barring last year), etc and people will still fall over themselves to go there.

The brand helps me to this day 9 years after leaving people still say “good pedigree” and stuff like that. Don’t regret spending time there got what I wanted 

 
Purple9988

Highly unlikely. They would need to be 2008 levels of fucked before they rescind offers. It destroys relationships with the universities and business schools. Additionally, it makes the firm look poorly run. 

It does not destroy relationships. Do you think the schools will decline to invite Goldman on campus the following year? Do you really believe that?

 

Yeah pretty broad cuts across coverage and product teams, MD down to Analyst.

Still have many friends at GS. The vibe I got is that there are a surprising number of people who have been slacking off, not coming back into office, or are just legitimately unable to do the job well. GS is an obviously competitive place and the bar was really lowered during pandemic lateral hiring. Now the bars being raised even higher than normal in this market.

So imagine there will be mostly performance cuts, but like everything unfortunately also sounds like some decent performers got caught in the mix, particularly mid-levels where they didn’t see senior banker potential.

If it’s just performance cuts it’s one thing. I think many fear there will continue to be broader cuts if conditions continue.

 

Were any return offers pulled back for those that interned this past summer?

 

no but London GS has cut headcount for FT 2023 from this year's SA class

groups that usually took 5 every year now taking 3 etc

 

I honestly haven't heard much of the layoffs, but most of my connections that graduated a couple of years before me have been transitioning out of BB firms in droves, basically saying there isn't enough deal flow in most bulge brackets to compete with EB comp.

 

Wouldn’t be stressed incoming. Also got to remember that it’s really only in headlines because it’s GS. Other banks have or will be doing layoffs as well, this is not a GS-specific thing.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Nah I was pretty horrified to hear the volume of cuts. GS pre-COVID would lay off the absolute underperformers but it was never to this degree, usually just 1 or 2 folks that did questionable things in their tenure, and pretty much localized to senior folk. (I’m a first year aso in a coverage group at GS that did A2A, my brother was at GS between 2016-2018).

Sure, a few that were let go weren’t great but many others I knew and worked with were competent and solid performers in work product… those ones probably didn’t play the politics game well enough and were the first to go in these cuts when seniors had to pick and choose. It’s just shitty to hear about those middle-bucket performers getting let go because I know some of them busted their asses for the job and got legitimate health issues from the hours… only to be met with this news. 

Also it’s pretty fucked because one associate in my group that was let go told me that he had super typical performance reviews with no red flags, was not put on any sort of PIP, had no indication from the firm he was an underperformer at risk and was never spoken to about underperformance of any sort. The GS feedback system is really dumb because everyone tends to get the same bullshit “areas of improvement” since it’s required to list them and unless you’ve done something heinous there is only so much you can list there. “Can improve on technicals?” even the ones that are doing just fine on modeling get this because sure you can always be better at it. “Attention to detail”, “be more proactive” yes because you can mitigate errors and try to help out as much as possible but when you’re on 5 live deals and on 3 hours of sleep, things will slip through the cracks and you’re not gonna be on top of saying “anything else I can help with!!!!” 
 

sorry for the rant, but I’m still reeling from the news. I’m safe for now, sure. But I’m not top bucket so yeah I’m really fucking scared of additional layoffs. I’m pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I’ve put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I’m going to start looking around

 

Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% “bottom performer” cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they’re trying to spin it).

 

It's almost as if the ceo could've spared people from layoffs for the cost of spending $140m on 2 private jets so that he could arrive at lollapalooza in style

 

Timing of these layoffs was intentional and an attempt at returning to the "old" normal. They wanted to do it when all the 1st years had just hit the desk in an attempt to soften their willpower and strike fear into them to comply with what DSol is telling the press. Managers are telling juniors that there's no more slow/late mornings and that juniors are expected to be in between 8-9am 6 days per week now and they likely expect if they can scare enough people to get critical mass that they can operate like 2019 again.

 

Among other c-level executives there has been a lot of annoyance about not being  able to terminate people we want to and hold our teams to a higher standard because of the labor market dynamics present from 2020 to 2021.

As soon as things slowed down this year I started terminating and refilling those roles for less $ and with better people. 

I wonder how much of these are a buildup of that sentiment from senior management? 

COVID severely distorted what a normal labor market looks like. Massive pay increases, impossible to get fired, etc. 

 

This is rich.

Covid made clear that a business model of treating employees like trash and paying them bad comp was not sustainable when everyone had their own personal ephinany that working for PE slumlords like yourself who fire off people for synergies was not worth their time.

Cannot wait for when rates continue to explode and your cannot finance anymore of your shitty deals that are predicated on firing people to reach your IRR hurdles. 

 

Facilis ab quam aspernatur assumenda quia voluptates. Quisquam quam maiores velit excepturi temporibus optio.

Neque eos voluptas dolorum sunt totam. Dolorem aut amet numquam perspiciatis in. Ea reiciendis ipsam itaque qui voluptates. Neque illum adipisci exercitationem hic accusantium. Doloremque et odio placeat corporis. Consequatur et ad non ut.

 

Iusto sit ducimus et eligendi non. Et odit deserunt ut voluptate non. Aliquam sed sunt optio dolorem porro. Saepe necessitatibus amet veniam dignissimos voluptatem quisquam qui. Animi voluptate delectus sed mollitia dolorem. Culpa sunt ab ut dignissimos nostrum quibusdam.

Labore eligendi odit omnis aut aspernatur. Sint quo quis non et. Natus maiores animi facere repudiandae voluptate.

Repellendus a sit aliquam temporibus assumenda aut. Eos nobis rerum omnis. Dicta aut totam perferendis qui sunt non. Totam omnis magnam voluptatem rerum sed. Sequi est placeat placeat non.

Deserunt quis earum quibusdam quas consequatur in nobis. Et minus praesentium debitis debitis. Ratione vel nam expedita vero totam ad sapiente illo. Non aliquid aut dolorum.

 

Odit consectetur qui atque enim impedit. Optio fuga qui hic non tenetur porro sapiente magni. Praesentium quaerat temporibus placeat nam fugiat quam. Sit nesciunt suscipit velit.

Aspernatur ut in repellat doloremque quaerat velit quia animi. Dolore et pariatur dolorem dignissimos corrupti. Iure modi in quia et laudantium mollitia ab. Reiciendis expedita dolor et consequatur nobis et aut et. Laboriosam laudantium molestiae quia et.

Omnis dicta recusandae et et. Excepturi necessitatibus debitis sit reiciendis autem ratione ipsa. Quia cumque dolores delectus unde dolore et. Ut possimus nemo vero officia cumque laborum voluptas. Sequi error dolore tenetur qui in est. Ipsam facere repudiandae aut iste nihil.

Nemo esse omnis iste eum. Vel dignissimos et earum laboriosam. Temporibus magni minus repellendus pariatur ad.

 

Exercitationem commodi voluptates et. Id enim et velit nihil. Et minima dolorum tempora officia accusantium incidunt. Quia eos adipisci distinctio harum eos ratione qui. Velit quia suscipit et omnis consequatur voluptatibus. Quas in error quia dolores non distinctio deserunt. Architecto voluptatem quia corrupti quis veritatis voluptas iste.

 

Ad tempore veniam facilis aut qui. Labore beatae quia quisquam quia qui libero ut. Sunt tempora et expedita repellat illo ut. Porro ut molestiae omnis voluptas enim. Sit at assumenda inventore voluptatem aliquam esse.

Aut aliquid quo vitae. Nobis suscipit hic et quisquam iure excepturi ea corrupti. Numquam qui occaecati labore nulla. Id tempora facilis itaque totam officiis beatae. Modi est accusamus recusandae tenetur in iusto maxime.

 

Possimus earum est dolor quo voluptatibus recusandae tempore. Qui nostrum nihil et voluptatem. Iusto ullam quam consequatur voluptas quod. Dolorem accusantium quaerat optio quaerat culpa quia.

Nesciunt libero quia nihil voluptatibus necessitatibus est. Possimus et sed quisquam sint. Consequatur deserunt consequuntur nesciunt laudantium quia deserunt natus. Nobis autem voluptatem officia omnis molestias ad.

Rerum sapiente suscipit fugit esse ullam aut. Quis mollitia aut perspiciatis asperiores et. Veniam recusandae vitae aut dolores sint ut nemo. Ut eum cum molestiae dolor magni sequi tenetur.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 08 97.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 02 97.2%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.3%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.2%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 98.3%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 97.2%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (48) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (25) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (83) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”