GS Layoffs hit NY

Any details? Groups, level?

Summary 

TMT: 12 Across NY and SF

FIG: ~10% of FIG

HC: 7+ Asso/ VPs

CRG: 1 VP, 2 associates, 1 analyst

IND: 2 ASO, 3 VP, 1 MD

HK: 25+ bankers 

5+ Associates across all Classic groups; including As1’s

“Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% "bottom performer" cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they're trying to spin it)”

“I'm pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I've put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I'm going to start looking around”

 

Well one person said in another thread a couple analysts found out the hard way when their card access no longer worked and security escorted them...

 

Well one person said in another thread a couple analysts found out the hard way when their card access no longer worked and security escorted them...

This is like those chain mail emails/texts where if you don’t forward to 5 of your friends, then your parents will die

hint: it’s not real

 
Most Helpful

At gs ny and can confirm some analysts key cards didn't work.  Super brutal way to be let go.

 

wtf that's so spinless, literally so fucked. Could they not just send an email? Or an in-person sit-down? massive cowards. literally cowardice by those who run the organization is the only excuse. Oh wahh is baby too scared of a little confrontation from their employee?

Need to start asking company leaders in interviews "how would you handle layoffs? or a situation in which layoffs might occur?"

 

This sounds like this can't possibly be right. Who in their right mind would terminate an employee in this manner? Unless you thought there was a security/physical threat, they know they would receive tremendous negative blowback (not that they would care in the long run) if they terminated this way. I mean, for all the shit Goldman gets, is there nobody decent in the higher-ups/HR that would say, "No, this is the wrong way to do it, the decent thing to do is to call him/her in, have a brief discussion and send them on their way."  I know it's possible, but was the winning philosophy really, "F that, let's just deactivate their keycards, totally ghost the F  outta them and maybe send them their belongings"? 

 

Ha, I wrote the post above you, and even I think your response is funny. Look, I know they're the Evil Empire and all, but still, you would think they would show a sliver of compassion.  (can't give you a "banana" because I'm apparently out of them, or something like that). 

 

Guy has a point. Grinding analysts to the bone, GS 13, protected Saturdays, massive lateral hiring, massive cold firing…all in 18 months. Seems fucked

 

Do you actually work at FTP? Haha is it still 100 hr work weeks there?

 

this shit pisses me off. knowing that those kids likely just wanted to have a good summer experience and learn about the industry but got absolutely destroyed instead is unacceptable

 

yeah heard even in the PE arm, SAs were absolutely crushed

 

And it's at every level. Not just front office. Have seen people take pretty sh*tty back office jobs there just for the brand name. And I admit it, the one person I'm thinking of - the brand name did help them in the long term once they left the big banks and entered more of a boutique firm environment (for clients and employers, Goldman's name does carry a "prestige" factor).

 

pretty much - GS has always looked out for GS but they always have a line of wannabe simps lining outside the door no matter what they do.  5 days a week back at work, horrible hours, comp usually not great (barring last year), etc and people will still fall over themselves to go there.

The brand helps me to this day 9 years after leaving people still say “good pedigree” and stuff like that. Don’t regret spending time there got what I wanted 

 
Purple9988

Highly unlikely. They would need to be 2008 levels of fucked before they rescind offers. It destroys relationships with the universities and business schools. Additionally, it makes the firm look poorly run. 

It does not destroy relationships. Do you think the schools will decline to invite Goldman on campus the following year? Do you really believe that?

 

Yeah pretty broad cuts across coverage and product teams, MD down to Analyst.

Still have many friends at GS. The vibe I got is that there are a surprising number of people who have been slacking off, not coming back into office, or are just legitimately unable to do the job well. GS is an obviously competitive place and the bar was really lowered during pandemic lateral hiring. Now the bars being raised even higher than normal in this market.

So imagine there will be mostly performance cuts, but like everything unfortunately also sounds like some decent performers got caught in the mix, particularly mid-levels where they didn’t see senior banker potential.

If it’s just performance cuts it’s one thing. I think many fear there will continue to be broader cuts if conditions continue.

 

Were any return offers pulled back for those that interned this past summer?

 

no but London GS has cut headcount for FT 2023 from this year's SA class

groups that usually took 5 every year now taking 3 etc

 

Damn, that'd suck to start as an analyst at GS TMT, thinking you've made it to the top of Wall Street only to get laid off 3 months later

All jokes aside, any data for other groups? How do the layoffs compare to FIG, IND, HC?

 

This thread really puts to rest the notion that only MDs/Ds/VPs are in the firing line for these types of circumstances.

 

At least seven at VP/Associate level in HC across the US. All were solid, none bottom bucket. 

Am at GS, am in HC.

 

any idea what the logic is behind this?

I could understand a cyclical sector or product team but HC is one of the most active sectors in the world with potentially huge EVs deals, growth equity pipeline, specialist knowledge & relationships straddle across academica-industry-finance lol

 

gs has always been a sharp elbowed place.  honestly, if you signed up to go there you should know what to expect.

its like heading over to citadel and being stressed about getting let go (part of the game there).

goods news is that GS is a great place to get laid off from, plenty of places willing to take a look at  GS ex person

 

Wouldn’t be stressed incoming. Also got to remember that it’s really only in headlines because it’s GS. Other banks have or will be doing layoffs as well, this is not a GS-specific thing.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

I think folks internally are shocked because there were a good chunk of middle bucket folks that were let go, while people that we thought were going to be part of the cuts weren’t 

 

Nah I was pretty horrified to hear the volume of cuts. GS pre-COVID would lay off the absolute underperformers but it was never to this degree, usually just 1 or 2 folks that did questionable things in their tenure, and pretty much localized to senior folk. (I’m a first year aso in a coverage group at GS that did A2A, my brother was at GS between 2016-2018).

Sure, a few that were let go weren’t great but many others I knew and worked with were competent and solid performers in work product… those ones probably didn’t play the politics game well enough and were the first to go in these cuts when seniors had to pick and choose. It’s just shitty to hear about those middle-bucket performers getting let go because I know some of them busted their asses for the job and got legitimate health issues from the hours… only to be met with this news. 

Also it’s pretty fucked because one associate in my group that was let go told me that he had super typical performance reviews with no red flags, was not put on any sort of PIP, had no indication from the firm he was an underperformer at risk and was never spoken to about underperformance of any sort. The GS feedback system is really dumb because everyone tends to get the same bullshit “areas of improvement” since it’s required to list them and unless you’ve done something heinous there is only so much you can list there. “Can improve on technicals?” even the ones that are doing just fine on modeling get this because sure you can always be better at it. “Attention to detail”, “be more proactive” yes because you can mitigate errors and try to help out as much as possible but when you’re on 5 live deals and on 3 hours of sleep, things will slip through the cracks and you’re not gonna be on top of saying “anything else I can help with!!!!” 
 

sorry for the rant, but I’m still reeling from the news. I’m safe for now, sure. But I’m not top bucket so yeah I’m really fucking scared of additional layoffs. I’m pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I’ve put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I’m going to start looking around

 

Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% “bottom performer” cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they’re trying to spin it).

 

It's almost as if the ceo could've spared people from layoffs for the cost of spending $140m on 2 private jets so that he could arrive at lollapalooza in style

 

Do you mean in the next week or so or in the coming months?

If the former, banks usually try to rip the band aid off quick. Layoffs generally happen in 2 day periods.

All that said, I have no fucking idea

 

Cuts largely focused on junior mid level (senior associates, junior VPs) even if performing. MDs not really consulted. ECM and Levfin hit hard with some MDs impacted. Heard there may be further cuts

 

Timing of these layoffs was intentional and an attempt at returning to the "old" normal. They wanted to do it when all the 1st years had just hit the desk in an attempt to soften their willpower and strike fear into them to comply with what DSol is telling the press. Managers are telling juniors that there's no more slow/late mornings and that juniors are expected to be in between 8-9am 6 days per week now and they likely expect if they can scare enough people to get critical mass that they can operate like 2019 again.

 

Among other c-level executives there has been a lot of annoyance about not being  able to terminate people we want to and hold our teams to a higher standard because of the labor market dynamics present from 2020 to 2021.

As soon as things slowed down this year I started terminating and refilling those roles for less $ and with better people. 

I wonder how much of these are a buildup of that sentiment from senior management? 

COVID severely distorted what a normal labor market looks like. Massive pay increases, impossible to get fired, etc. 

 

This is rich.

Covid made clear that a business model of treating employees like trash and paying them bad comp was not sustainable when everyone had their own personal ephinany that working for PE slumlords like yourself who fire off people for synergies was not worth their time.

Cannot wait for when rates continue to explode and your cannot finance anymore of your shitty deals that are predicated on firing people to reach your IRR hurdles. 

 

Beatae id et qui officiis aspernatur. Cupiditate atque et ipsa ut ipsa illo. Ut rerum illum ex nostrum.

Rem fuga non sint alias ut qui eligendi. Aut ad explicabo amet vel magni. Et reiciendis minus sed.

Sequi qui esse deleniti earum. Vitae unde exercitationem asperiores aliquid velit deserunt occaecati. Et enim dolores ducimus velit aut sint quis. Commodi maiores esse ipsum magnam velit aut facere. Saepe veritatis doloremque labore fugit inventore temporibus soluta. In excepturi atque fugiat provident aut.

 

Quo nesciunt expedita natus architecto porro. Odit accusantium est doloremque esse voluptatem voluptatibus qui. Dolores aut et ea doloremque hic.

Quam autem voluptate mollitia animi. Vitae voluptatem aut asperiores ut rerum dignissimos. Voluptatem aut quam corporis aut. Cumque quam a ipsam omnis eligendi qui deleniti.

Eos suscipit quas temporibus sapiente eos velit autem consequatur. Placeat rerum sunt nobis officia. Laudantium nemo eos non nihil molestias voluptatibus labore fugit.

Enim consectetur consectetur in a eius est quisquam. Vero modi qui iure debitis vel commodi. Magnam at dolores expedita possimus facere sit voluptas. In et quia et debitis.

 

Repudiandae debitis rerum mollitia similique. Assumenda incidunt iste reiciendis nisi fugit ducimus eligendi. Quisquam minus quia est debitis. Et numquam consequatur rem quidem est aut quos. Cumque animi corrupti aut. Ullam sed facere rerum minus optio exercitationem.

Nihil eos est odio harum et id quasi dolorum. Soluta quasi ab rem magni laborum eum omnis. Error qui aut natus ea atque. Voluptas possimus alias ullam officia velit molestiae.

Quae veniam enim odio fuga. Facilis nesciunt blanditiis dolorum pariatur ducimus eaque a maiores. Mollitia officiis autem tempore repellendus qui quo. Porro sunt odio quia atque quia consequatur nihil. Saepe eligendi neque illum voluptatibus. Tenetur eligendi est ea consequatur inventore beatae.

Fuga ut magnam quia laborum. Consequatur nobis tempore delectus nihil nemo perferendis laborum. Ab quis numquam fugit non eum earum. Nihil iusto eos modi aut vero velit hic. Quia qui alias ullam pariatur aut. Hic facilis magni eius aliquid. Placeat cumque ad atque ducimus.

 

Exercitationem non non dolore cupiditate sed vero incidunt. Placeat magnam nulla nesciunt aliquid quis. Dolore doloribus molestiae ipsam consequuntur consequuntur omnis. Eveniet fuga et vel voluptatibus qui est. Assumenda itaque et aspernatur repellat ad praesentium officiis. Fugiat labore nulla autem dicta.

Nisi pariatur delectus libero labore. Provident quasi qui sunt necessitatibus vel et.

Consequuntur quia dolores sed nisi quae et velit. Animi et voluptas repellat ex quia quisquam. Qui perferendis tempora culpa sed repudiandae sed perferendis eos.

 

Perferendis voluptatem deleniti sit nihil ad et ipsam. Vitae nam eveniet delectus vel sed porro. Voluptatem repellendus est minus. Quidem harum ex rem et harum aut blanditiis. Repellat nihil sint rerum molestias. Sit est repudiandae assumenda corrupti.

Qui ut aut vitae consectetur quo eos. Sit debitis rerum esse ipsa mollitia. In rerum ullam sed sunt quae laudantium.

Career Advancement Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. New 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

April 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (87) $260
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (14) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (205) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (146) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
8
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
9
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”