GS Layoffs hit NY

Any details? Groups, level?

Summary 

TMT: 12 Across NY and SF

FIG: ~10% of FIG

HC: 7+ Asso/ VPs

CRG: 1 VP, 2 associates, 1 analyst

IND: 2 ASO, 3 VP, 1 MD

HK: 25+ bankers 

5+ Associates across all Classic groups; including As1’s

“Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% "bottom performer" cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they're trying to spin it)”

“I'm pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I've put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I'm going to start looking around”

179 Comments
 

Well one person said in another thread a couple analysts found out the hard way when their card access no longer worked and security escorted them...

 

wtf that's so spinless, literally so fucked. Could they not just send an email? Or an in-person sit-down? massive cowards. literally cowardice by those who run the organization is the only excuse. Oh wahh is baby too scared of a little confrontation from their employee?

Need to start asking company leaders in interviews "how would you handle layoffs? or a situation in which layoffs might occur?"

 

This sounds like this can't possibly be right. Who in their right mind would terminate an employee in this manner? Unless you thought there was a security/physical threat, they know they would receive tremendous negative blowback (not that they would care in the long run) if they terminated this way. I mean, for all the shit Goldman gets, is there nobody decent in the higher-ups/HR that would say, "No, this is the wrong way to do it, the decent thing to do is to call him/her in, have a brief discussion and send them on their way."  I know it's possible, but was the winning philosophy really, "F that, let's just deactivate their keycards, totally ghost the F  outta them and maybe send them their belongings"? 

 

Ha, I wrote the post above you, and even I think your response is funny. Look, I know they're the Evil Empire and all, but still, you would think they would show a sliver of compassion.  (can't give you a "banana" because I'm apparently out of them, or something like that). 

 

Guy has a point. Grinding analysts to the bone, GS 13, protected Saturdays, massive lateral hiring, massive cold firing…all in 18 months. Seems fucked

 

this shit pisses me off. knowing that those kids likely just wanted to have a good summer experience and learn about the industry but got absolutely destroyed instead is unacceptable

 

For every employee that gets thrown out the door like Jazzy Jeff:

jazzy jeff

You got 10 hardos lining up and drooling at the thought of getting used and abused. GS can do what they want.

 

And it's at every level. Not just front office. Have seen people take pretty sh*tty back office jobs there just for the brand name. And I admit it, the one person I'm thinking of - the brand name did help them in the long term once they left the big banks and entered more of a boutique firm environment (for clients and employers, Goldman's name does carry a "prestige" factor).

 

pretty much - GS has always looked out for GS but they always have a line of wannabe simps lining outside the door no matter what they do.  5 days a week back at work, horrible hours, comp usually not great (barring last year), etc and people will still fall over themselves to go there.

The brand helps me to this day 9 years after leaving people still say “good pedigree” and stuff like that. Don’t regret spending time there got what I wanted 

 
Purple9988

Highly unlikely. They would need to be 2008 levels of fucked before they rescind offers. It destroys relationships with the universities and business schools. Additionally, it makes the firm look poorly run. 

It does not destroy relationships. Do you think the schools will decline to invite Goldman on campus the following year? Do you really believe that?

 

Yeah pretty broad cuts across coverage and product teams, MD down to Analyst.

Still have many friends at GS. The vibe I got is that there are a surprising number of people who have been slacking off, not coming back into office, or are just legitimately unable to do the job well. GS is an obviously competitive place and the bar was really lowered during pandemic lateral hiring. Now the bars being raised even higher than normal in this market.

So imagine there will be mostly performance cuts, but like everything unfortunately also sounds like some decent performers got caught in the mix, particularly mid-levels where they didn’t see senior banker potential.

If it’s just performance cuts it’s one thing. I think many fear there will continue to be broader cuts if conditions continue.

 

Were any return offers pulled back for those that interned this past summer?

 

no but London GS has cut headcount for FT 2023 from this year's SA class

groups that usually took 5 every year now taking 3 etc

 

I honestly haven't heard much of the layoffs, but most of my connections that graduated a couple of years before me have been transitioning out of BB firms in droves, basically saying there isn't enough deal flow in most bulge brackets to compete with EB comp.

 

Wouldn’t be stressed incoming. Also got to remember that it’s really only in headlines because it’s GS. Other banks have or will be doing layoffs as well, this is not a GS-specific thing.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Nah I was pretty horrified to hear the volume of cuts. GS pre-COVID would lay off the absolute underperformers but it was never to this degree, usually just 1 or 2 folks that did questionable things in their tenure, and pretty much localized to senior folk. (I’m a first year aso in a coverage group at GS that did A2A, my brother was at GS between 2016-2018).

Sure, a few that were let go weren’t great but many others I knew and worked with were competent and solid performers in work product… those ones probably didn’t play the politics game well enough and were the first to go in these cuts when seniors had to pick and choose. It’s just shitty to hear about those middle-bucket performers getting let go because I know some of them busted their asses for the job and got legitimate health issues from the hours… only to be met with this news. 

Also it’s pretty fucked because one associate in my group that was let go told me that he had super typical performance reviews with no red flags, was not put on any sort of PIP, had no indication from the firm he was an underperformer at risk and was never spoken to about underperformance of any sort. The GS feedback system is really dumb because everyone tends to get the same bullshit “areas of improvement” since it’s required to list them and unless you’ve done something heinous there is only so much you can list there. “Can improve on technicals?” even the ones that are doing just fine on modeling get this because sure you can always be better at it. “Attention to detail”, “be more proactive” yes because you can mitigate errors and try to help out as much as possible but when you’re on 5 live deals and on 3 hours of sleep, things will slip through the cracks and you’re not gonna be on top of saying “anything else I can help with!!!!” 
 

sorry for the rant, but I’m still reeling from the news. I’m safe for now, sure. But I’m not top bucket so yeah I’m really fucking scared of additional layoffs. I’m pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I’ve put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I’m going to start looking around

 

Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% “bottom performer” cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they’re trying to spin it).

 

It's almost as if the ceo could've spared people from layoffs for the cost of spending $140m on 2 private jets so that he could arrive at lollapalooza in style

 

Timing of these layoffs was intentional and an attempt at returning to the "old" normal. They wanted to do it when all the 1st years had just hit the desk in an attempt to soften their willpower and strike fear into them to comply with what DSol is telling the press. Managers are telling juniors that there's no more slow/late mornings and that juniors are expected to be in between 8-9am 6 days per week now and they likely expect if they can scare enough people to get critical mass that they can operate like 2019 again.

 

Among other c-level executives there has been a lot of annoyance about not being  able to terminate people we want to and hold our teams to a higher standard because of the labor market dynamics present from 2020 to 2021.

As soon as things slowed down this year I started terminating and refilling those roles for less $ and with better people. 

I wonder how much of these are a buildup of that sentiment from senior management? 

COVID severely distorted what a normal labor market looks like. Massive pay increases, impossible to get fired, etc. 

 

This is rich.

Covid made clear that a business model of treating employees like trash and paying them bad comp was not sustainable when everyone had their own personal ephinany that working for PE slumlords like yourself who fire off people for synergies was not worth their time.

Cannot wait for when rates continue to explode and your cannot finance anymore of your shitty deals that are predicated on firing people to reach your IRR hurdles. 

 

Consequuntur omnis sequi labore totam voluptatem. Nihil consequatur in enim fugit.

 

Blanditiis facere quae omnis ratione veritatis voluptatem. Et quo ut totam vitae expedita iusto. Quis qui quibusdam ipsa quidem. Itaque fuga tempore et eveniet magnam. Et deleniti molestiae ea cupiditate et corrupti. Amet ut ea eius reprehenderit sit id.

Veniam laborum eos animi explicabo inventore aut vero possimus. Qui necessitatibus placeat tenetur non autem quia. Laborum illum libero dolores iusto sunt autem.

Ut ex corrupti ea consectetur. Quod vero nostrum illum velit natus rerum. Repellendus exercitationem dolorem dicta consectetur incidunt error voluptatem. Est saepe nemo totam consequatur.

Totam dolorem cupiditate voluptates sequi. Sed libero a harum veritatis provident omnis qui. Deleniti rerum eveniet aperiam dolor nulla officiis doloremque vel. Debitis modi quia reprehenderit suscipit explicabo at laboriosam.

 

Quia aut architecto dolores dolores quo in sint. Accusamus qui dicta doloremque dolor ex dolores.

Quae odio et ipsa est corporis molestias. Assumenda aut eum accusamus ea voluptas. Et sint modi non. Aut aut enim accusamus. Sequi earum odio dolore consequuntur. Enim qui quo a doloribus debitis quod quod. Explicabo nemo nesciunt consequatur dolores quia.

Voluptatem dolor sequi recusandae ratione voluptas nisi. Dolores assumenda velit distinctio doloremque. Aliquid doloremque pariatur incidunt numquam officiis. Autem fugit temporibus expedita voluptatem voluptates dolor qui. Dignissimos eos ullam animi quos eius magni. Soluta eos eum accusantium nihil illo fugiat et porro. Voluptas voluptates exercitationem consequatur deleniti.

 

Provident facere similique aut quaerat vero neque. Voluptatem natus dolorem ut. Maxime rerum iste in officia sed numquam et.

Explicabo quod qui rerum modi itaque rerum. Et iure ea similique ipsa. Sed perferendis placeat nobis rerum mollitia. Beatae ex impedit in qui. Nulla sit numquam dolor veniam impedit voluptates ut asperiores. Adipisci nemo odio quis aspernatur officia ipsa a. Accusantium distinctio accusamus in sed.

Enim magni velit magni libero non sed. Aperiam mollitia voluptas est dignissimos. Maxime nam voluptas ut aut et.

Officia nemo hic qui eius omnis odio voluptas. Voluptates blanditiis sit itaque eius quia.

 

Commodi voluptatem quaerat illum aut illum. Itaque voluptas aut occaecati perferendis ipsa amet dolor.

Et sunt pariatur officia officia porro qui est. Accusamus error consequatur ullam accusamus rerum facilis. Omnis est qui voluptatem natus sed eum. Sunt eum occaecati explicabo.

Accusantium adipisci error molestiae. Officiis alias est sunt repudiandae. Maxime non et sed. Officiis cumque asperiores excepturi assumenda quo aut.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (28) $184
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”