GS Layoffs hit NY

Any details? Groups, level?

Summary 

TMT: 12 Across NY and SF

FIG: ~10% of FIG

HC: 7+ Asso/ VPs

CRG: 1 VP, 2 associates, 1 analyst

IND: 2 ASO, 3 VP, 1 MD

HK: 25+ bankers 

5+ Associates across all Classic groups; including As1’s

“Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% "bottom performer" cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they're trying to spin it)”

“I'm pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I've put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I'm going to start looking around”

179 Comments
 

Well one person said in another thread a couple analysts found out the hard way when their card access no longer worked and security escorted them...

 

wtf that's so spinless, literally so fucked. Could they not just send an email? Or an in-person sit-down? massive cowards. literally cowardice by those who run the organization is the only excuse. Oh wahh is baby too scared of a little confrontation from their employee?

Need to start asking company leaders in interviews "how would you handle layoffs? or a situation in which layoffs might occur?"

 

This sounds like this can't possibly be right. Who in their right mind would terminate an employee in this manner? Unless you thought there was a security/physical threat, they know they would receive tremendous negative blowback (not that they would care in the long run) if they terminated this way. I mean, for all the shit Goldman gets, is there nobody decent in the higher-ups/HR that would say, "No, this is the wrong way to do it, the decent thing to do is to call him/her in, have a brief discussion and send them on their way."  I know it's possible, but was the winning philosophy really, "F that, let's just deactivate their keycards, totally ghost the F  outta them and maybe send them their belongings"? 

 

Ha, I wrote the post above you, and even I think your response is funny. Look, I know they're the Evil Empire and all, but still, you would think they would show a sliver of compassion.  (can't give you a "banana" because I'm apparently out of them, or something like that). 

 

Guy has a point. Grinding analysts to the bone, GS 13, protected Saturdays, massive lateral hiring, massive cold firing…all in 18 months. Seems fucked

 

this shit pisses me off. knowing that those kids likely just wanted to have a good summer experience and learn about the industry but got absolutely destroyed instead is unacceptable

 

For every employee that gets thrown out the door like Jazzy Jeff:

jazzy jeff

You got 10 hardos lining up and drooling at the thought of getting used and abused. GS can do what they want.

 

And it's at every level. Not just front office. Have seen people take pretty sh*tty back office jobs there just for the brand name. And I admit it, the one person I'm thinking of - the brand name did help them in the long term once they left the big banks and entered more of a boutique firm environment (for clients and employers, Goldman's name does carry a "prestige" factor).

 

pretty much - GS has always looked out for GS but they always have a line of wannabe simps lining outside the door no matter what they do.  5 days a week back at work, horrible hours, comp usually not great (barring last year), etc and people will still fall over themselves to go there.

The brand helps me to this day 9 years after leaving people still say “good pedigree” and stuff like that. Don’t regret spending time there got what I wanted 

 
Purple9988

Highly unlikely. They would need to be 2008 levels of fucked before they rescind offers. It destroys relationships with the universities and business schools. Additionally, it makes the firm look poorly run. 

It does not destroy relationships. Do you think the schools will decline to invite Goldman on campus the following year? Do you really believe that?

 

Yeah pretty broad cuts across coverage and product teams, MD down to Analyst.

Still have many friends at GS. The vibe I got is that there are a surprising number of people who have been slacking off, not coming back into office, or are just legitimately unable to do the job well. GS is an obviously competitive place and the bar was really lowered during pandemic lateral hiring. Now the bars being raised even higher than normal in this market.

So imagine there will be mostly performance cuts, but like everything unfortunately also sounds like some decent performers got caught in the mix, particularly mid-levels where they didn’t see senior banker potential.

If it’s just performance cuts it’s one thing. I think many fear there will continue to be broader cuts if conditions continue.

 

Were any return offers pulled back for those that interned this past summer?

 

no but London GS has cut headcount for FT 2023 from this year's SA class

groups that usually took 5 every year now taking 3 etc

 

I honestly haven't heard much of the layoffs, but most of my connections that graduated a couple of years before me have been transitioning out of BB firms in droves, basically saying there isn't enough deal flow in most bulge brackets to compete with EB comp.

 

At least seven at VP/Associate level in HC across the US. All were solid, none bottom bucket. 

Am at GS, am in HC.

 

Wouldn’t be stressed incoming. Also got to remember that it’s really only in headlines because it’s GS. Other banks have or will be doing layoffs as well, this is not a GS-specific thing.

 
[Comment removed by mod team]
 

Nah I was pretty horrified to hear the volume of cuts. GS pre-COVID would lay off the absolute underperformers but it was never to this degree, usually just 1 or 2 folks that did questionable things in their tenure, and pretty much localized to senior folk. (I’m a first year aso in a coverage group at GS that did A2A, my brother was at GS between 2016-2018).

Sure, a few that were let go weren’t great but many others I knew and worked with were competent and solid performers in work product… those ones probably didn’t play the politics game well enough and were the first to go in these cuts when seniors had to pick and choose. It’s just shitty to hear about those middle-bucket performers getting let go because I know some of them busted their asses for the job and got legitimate health issues from the hours… only to be met with this news. 

Also it’s pretty fucked because one associate in my group that was let go told me that he had super typical performance reviews with no red flags, was not put on any sort of PIP, had no indication from the firm he was an underperformer at risk and was never spoken to about underperformance of any sort. The GS feedback system is really dumb because everyone tends to get the same bullshit “areas of improvement” since it’s required to list them and unless you’ve done something heinous there is only so much you can list there. “Can improve on technicals?” even the ones that are doing just fine on modeling get this because sure you can always be better at it. “Attention to detail”, “be more proactive” yes because you can mitigate errors and try to help out as much as possible but when you’re on 5 live deals and on 3 hours of sleep, things will slip through the cracks and you’re not gonna be on top of saying “anything else I can help with!!!!” 
 

sorry for the rant, but I’m still reeling from the news. I’m safe for now, sure. But I’m not top bucket so yeah I’m really fucking scared of additional layoffs. I’m pretty middle/upper-mid bucket and like many of those who were let go, I’ve put in so much fucking work into this job and have a good work product. Morale among my class is so low right now and I’m going to start looking around

 

Seems like 10%+ for many groups. More than the 1-3% “bottom performer” cuts media claimed. Seems like cost cutting in a downturn, not re-instating performance reviews at all (not that we should be surprised they’re trying to spin it).

 

It's almost as if the ceo could've spared people from layoffs for the cost of spending $140m on 2 private jets so that he could arrive at lollapalooza in style

 

Timing of these layoffs was intentional and an attempt at returning to the "old" normal. They wanted to do it when all the 1st years had just hit the desk in an attempt to soften their willpower and strike fear into them to comply with what DSol is telling the press. Managers are telling juniors that there's no more slow/late mornings and that juniors are expected to be in between 8-9am 6 days per week now and they likely expect if they can scare enough people to get critical mass that they can operate like 2019 again.

 

Among other c-level executives there has been a lot of annoyance about not being  able to terminate people we want to and hold our teams to a higher standard because of the labor market dynamics present from 2020 to 2021.

As soon as things slowed down this year I started terminating and refilling those roles for less $ and with better people. 

I wonder how much of these are a buildup of that sentiment from senior management? 

COVID severely distorted what a normal labor market looks like. Massive pay increases, impossible to get fired, etc. 

 

This is rich.

Covid made clear that a business model of treating employees like trash and paying them bad comp was not sustainable when everyone had their own personal ephinany that working for PE slumlords like yourself who fire off people for synergies was not worth their time.

Cannot wait for when rates continue to explode and your cannot finance anymore of your shitty deals that are predicated on firing people to reach your IRR hurdles. 

 

Ducimus quisquam molestiae ea et. Praesentium harum aliquid in similique voluptas occaecati necessitatibus odit.

Facere est autem quas quae. Sit pariatur quibusdam dolorum eligendi non quasi. Delectus consequatur voluptatem labore debitis voluptates minima velit sapiente.

Veniam non quos alias aut et. Voluptas ullam odio autem eum eum aliquid aut eaque. Ipsa expedita assumenda magni praesentium. Voluptates et qui temporibus rem illum enim.

Rem sunt et quia et ea et. Asperiores accusantium minima perferendis et adipisci ipsam. Eveniet praesentium cum sunt eum nemo qui sequi.

 

Et minus alias repellendus qui reprehenderit accusantium. Consequatur qui enim et animi omnis occaecati quos. Magni adipisci sed sint non culpa. Molestias repellat ut nam cupiditate vel expedita id et. Eos sapiente quas sit hic.

Est veritatis nihil aut nostrum sed deserunt. Consequuntur quidem et qui omnis vel cupiditate. Enim et ipsum eum consequatur voluptatem. Non neque quia velit.

 

Qui repellendus nisi iure voluptatum nisi in et nihil. Occaecati modi sit tempore explicabo. Ducimus impedit distinctio nemo aut et hic.

Totam corrupti voluptates ea est sed aut nisi. Voluptas quos omnis perferendis vel velit omnis. Alias et dolore hic ducimus velit rem eos. Eum delectus amet perspiciatis distinctio libero exercitationem.

Voluptatum voluptatem dignissimos quidem et repellat esse perspiciatis. Consequatur dolor similique suscipit dolor architecto magni. Voluptas vitae quod laboriosam quidem illo impedit culpa. Aperiam doloribus aut dolor facere.

Consequatur eos atque voluptas aut nobis a. Et saepe non id officiis asperiores rerum optio. Officiis facere quaerat corporis ipsa corporis vero. Illum ut sit sequi consequuntur. Quia voluptatibus ipsa temporibus rem qui perferendis harum non.

 

Qui et fugit cumque eaque quos sed dolorem. Doloremque natus consequatur cupiditate corporis voluptatem inventore.

Commodi unde totam fugiat. Eius sint id pariatur vero possimus dolore sed.

Cum laboriosam vel aut sit omnis aut sapiente. Qui corporis dignissimos expedita dolorum voluptatibus sit et vel. Doloribus explicabo eos expedita eligendi nemo. Nisi corrupti occaecati ut adipisci dolores et. Non qui sed ipsam voluptatibus amet tempora et. Corrupti quis animi sint sed.

 

Enim quam sint qui aut accusamus nobis ducimus. Unde debitis saepe libero hic perspiciatis. Sed cum ea et doloremque est corporis adipisci. Dolorum perspiciatis ipsum sed nulla. Quod in ex est sed cum et ratione neque. Fugiat necessitatibus sint dolor a molestiae sapiente. Mollitia doloremque enim unde optio et.

Reprehenderit et magni omnis sed maxime. Ipsum mollitia consequuntur quam suscipit dolores et dolore autem.

Explicabo ab in debitis perspiciatis. Cum praesentium iure optio consequuntur. In accusamus velit in alias quia at mollitia. Non sed consequatur quibusdam eius.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”