HF Analyst Pitch Examples
Most l/s hedge fund analyst job postings ask for a company analysis/pitch example for an investment idea you've had. Some specify to keep it to 1-2 pages, but others are open ended. Does anyone have any examples they can share of a company pitch for an interview or application submission? Coming from an IB background I'm obviously familiar with pitch books and sell side research, but I'm looking for some guidelines to a more utilitarian and concise approach rather than a 20+ page opus. Any pointers for hitting the key points in an analysis without appearing overly simplistic would be great.
I would think the top three questions you want to answer:
What does the company do/how it generates its economic return?
what the Street is missing?
Scenario Analysis/Valuation
recommendation: buy/sell upside $ & % downside $ & %
thesis & what's the street missing
what to look for / catalysts
explain upside scenario
explain downside scenario
share some analyses/numbers
And boom goes the dynamite SB for dontmakemeshortyou. Pop your simple 3 statement model in the back if you're feeling chipper. In "what to look for," I'd put an overview of how they make money/some industry crap.
read a lot of analyst reports from seeking alpha until you're just sick of reading them... then pick bits and pieces from what you liked in them and make your own format.
i'd personally be careful for putting upside potential in $ since you aren't sure how much money the PM will actually put into the position, but i don't really know much because i don't work at a hedge fund
no seeking alpha please. garbage reports. way too much qualitative bs without explanation of the impact on #s.
Here are some very good examples that are public domain:
http://www.valueinvestorsclub.com/value2/Idea/ViewIdea/1768?guestLogon=…
http://www.valueinvestorsclub.com/value2/Idea/ViewIdea/1738?guestLogon=…
The numbers should be supplementary and the real focus should be why your thesis is a). differentiated from the consensus and b). ultimately correct.
Less text More numbers
That was one hell of a slam dunk on AutoZone.
Anything that SeekingAlpha comes out with is more or less the most retarded thing I've ever read. Except for anything by Motley Fool.
Its worthless for individual picks but the site definitely has some interesting macro pieces on there.
I've never personally come across an insightful piece, but to the extent that there is one, it's probably not worth trawling through all the garbage to get to it
My layout usually goes something like this... condensed version:
1) Introduction - briefly explain the business, competitors, major industry metrics, etc. 2) General recommendation - are we looking at this as a short or a long, what's our time frame 3) Why Now - what makes it attractive now, why does the market love/hate the stock all the sudden 4) Commentary/Catalysts - is the market justified in its love/hate, what could happen to make stock rise/fall, what would the metrics look like if each catalyst happened 5) Explanation - why is the catalyst in favor of your recommendation most likely, why is the other unlikely, what research has gotten you to this conclusion 6) Valuation - briefly explain historic valuation, industry multiple, earnings growth potential, and what kind of return you think we can get (and over what time horizon), and the same for if downside catalyst happens
Do you think building a three statment model is necessary for #6? Any examples on catalysts for #4 that have worked well?
Can you give a couple examples of catalysts?
Also, how do you do valuation for these - is it as simple as "this stock is trading above comps" or is it a full blown DCF?
http://www.grahamanddoddsville.net/?page_id=689
Value investing newsletters put out by Columbia MBAs. Great interviews and very professional looking 2 page stock pitches.
Thanks everyone, very helpful pointers. Appreciate the links. For anyone else who reads this post looking for answers, here are a few other good ones I've used:
you're showing some great forum etiquette with your follow-up. +1
Value Investors Club is amazing to prepare for this IMO
Hedge Fund pitch idea for internship (Originally Posted: 05/13/2012)
from an internship posting:
"If you are confident in your investment abilities, include one investing idea pitch, although it is not necessary"
How would I go about including the idea pitch? should i put it in the body of the email? if so, where would i put my cover letter? lastly, if i get called for an interview should i be prepared to talk about that pitch more, or should i have other pitches going into the interview just in case?
Attachment, you're gunna need graphs and tables. Yes they will quizz you on the pitch.
thanks for the quick reply!
How long should the pitch be( a long with the graphs and tables)? A page? longer? shorter?
Make it in a powerpoint, if that wasn't clear from the other responses
I would delete this unless u want 10 other people applying
I would make a deck in PowerPoint, save it as a PDF file, and attach it with your application. I'd be sure to cover everything in the pitch that would be included in an actual presentation. Maybe someone can link to a good example for guidance?
Also, even if it's not "necessary," this really seems like something you should definitely do if you want the internship.
HF stock pitch interview assistance needed (Originally Posted: 09/24/2012)
I have been hit with some luck. Last week I applied to a top hedge fund (think Carlyle, Bridgewater, Citadel) that is looking for 1 or 2 associates from the top MBA programs. I applied thinking that this would be a long shot and that there was almost no chance of them even responding to me to let me know that I am not good enough. However, they just emailed me wanting to interview me on Wednesday.
They want me to come prepared with a 10 minute stock pitch on a company in a market where I happen to be a fluent speaker of the local language. I found this article that I found very helpful as well as some other good resources.
What I need from the monkeys is any advice that can give me an edge in this process. The problem is that I have never done a stock pitch before and am really looking to knock this one out of the park if possible because I may not get a chance like this in the near future.
Any advice would be appreciated.
http://www.wallstreetoasis.com/forums/hf-analyst-pitch-examples
Your going to be up against candidates who have spent months preparing for their pitches. Start now in creating a rough valuation model. In a stock pitch essentially everything comes down to valuation, timing and the contrarian case. I recommend making a slide deck and handing it to your interviewers so you look as professional as possible. Lots of graphs = money. Slides to think about include - Sector positioning, '13/'14 PE multiples, EPS forecasts, emerging market exposure, lead indicators, volume/price trends, downstream market trends, key themes (oil, china, QE, elections, currency, debt crisis, equity flows), cost pressure, M&A, CDS spreads, key catalysts, etc.
Absolutely wrong. Even after I've spent weeks learning a company, my final writeup is rarely more than a few pages. If you come in with a massive slide deck, we will immediately stereotype you as sell-side material. A good analyst can process a ton of data/material and come away with a succinct and accurate conclusion. Displaying a bunch of data points without meaningful analysis is useless. My firm pays $10s of millions to the sell-side for trading & research... we have no reason to bring on someone internally to do that. We need people who can think like investors. Think twice before taking bearing's advice.
HF final round L/S Pitch (Originally Posted: 01/05/2013)
Hi guys,
I have a final round coming up in a week at a multi-strat HF. The group I am interviewing with is market neutral equity and has asked that I prepare a long and short investment idea. This will be my third round of interviews (2 telephone), and I will be flying out to HQ to meet with the team in person.
HR contacted me telling me that I needed to prepare a long and short idea---giving no further information. Should I prepare a presentation, similar to the links below? I've already pitched a long idea over the phone to one of the analysts.
http://justiceholdingsltd.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Justice-Is-Bes…
http://www.tilsonfunds.com/Kraft.pdf
I'm planning on at least walking in with my investment thesis printed out and binded for the team, but I'm not exactly sure if they are going to want me to give a PPT presentation. Any thoughts on the matter would be appreciated.
Thanks,
CKA
Unless they explicitly mentioned a presentation, a short write-up should be the way to go. You could go for the classic Tiger 1-page format, or a bit longer, perhaps 3-5 pages. Make sure to discuss exactly how your view differs from the market.
The itinerary they sent me as a 1 hr time slot that says 'Presentation of long and short stock idea". I guess I'll call HR and confirm?
A one hour presentation?! I would guess that you would have to make some slides for that. Sounds really interesting. I would definitely call HR to confirm, but I think it would be a good idea to have slides even if other candidates traditionally did not make slides right? Whatever is easiest to convince them in an hour that you know how to analyze companies and understand the market. Disclaimer: I am a 1st year in IBD so don't take my word for anything.
Good luck, please let us know how you do.
I'd put a little more focus on the actual valuation than both those presentation imo. A simple capex multiple is not gonna cut it
Have done a few of these - it will be similar to what you did with the analyst over the phone. They will ask for your idea and are really testing your understand what a market neutral approach is and how you tie your long and short together. Also be prepared to defend your ideas/thesis, why the market has/has not priced your idea in and well as why you think one will outperform the other (probably the most important). You will probably meet with the whole team (including those you initially spoke with) and be prepared to defend your idea with each one of them. I would come in with at least two ideas (in my experience, it doesn't have to be long/short, it can be long only).
Unless they have specifically asked for it, I definitely would not prepare a presentation, write-up or model; there are probably better uses of your time. I would guess that there would be a case study following this round where you'd model and/or present a specific idea and provide a short write-up.
HTH and let me know if you have any questions.
Disagree about the model thing - how else are you supposed to have a good understanding of the company without a model? You should at the very least lay out a few years of historical financials and build a simple operating model to make sure your catalysts will have the effect you think they will.
What I think will really impress these guys is making a number of industry calls - company mgmt, competitors, etc. Call them up, say you're a private investor, and request a meeting with the CFO/IR rep. Worst they can say is no. I used to put a slide listing out everyone I talked to during my research - went over really well.
long GNC short VSI
just had the interview. will make a post detailing how it went. apparently its down to me and another person...fingers crossed
How are you supposed to have a good understanding of the company without a model? ...Is that a joke?
Know the fundamentals cold, know how it makes money, who its competitors are, what its competitive advantage/moat are, how it finances itself, who the management team is-their track record, reputation, historical performance as an operator, financier, and capital allocator, future plans for growth and how they plan to accomplish those plans, historical and prospective M&A, the list goes on...Plenty of buyside investors including myself rarely even turn to a sophisticated model of any consequence. NAV analysis maybe but what good is a DCF when you plug in more assumptions than facts? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying models are useless but if you think you can't know a company cold without building some model from scratch you are sorely mistaken.
I agree. Obviously you have to know the financials and how they match up with various trends and drivers, but if you are really tight on time, then you probably get more bang out of knowing the qualitative aspects of the business.
Long/short Hedge Fund Idea Pitch (Originally Posted: 04/20/2013)
Hi Guys,
I'll try and keep this post to the point and not digress,
I am looking to secure an internship position at a long/short hedge fund that I am extremely keen on getting into.
The fund specializes in U.S. equities
The format will follow as :
recommendation: buy/sell upside $ & % downside $ & % thesis & what's the street missing what to look for / catalysts explain upside scenario explain downside scenario share some analyses/numbers
I was thinking of completing the pitch in powerpoint and saving it as a pdf document.
I know this will be a noobish question but the only part I am sort of unsure of is the upside / downside calculation:
-Can it be assumed through a comparable analysis based on different percentile rankings of companies (10,20,30) to their respective earnings / share price?
-Should I base it off of technical indicators?
-Perhaps measure the implied volatility ranges to current share price while making some adjustments based on historical volatility?
I know ultimately that I will need to just choose one of them and make some solid assumptions to back them, but I would appreciate some guidance
As far as my initial analysis I feel as if a top down approach would be best as this is more akin to the brief description of the funds investment philosophy.
Sectors that I am considering maybe: -Energy -healthcare -consumer goods
Suggestions, areas to focus on, formatting and any sort of advice or grilling would be appreciated :)
Thanks!
some great questions, I wish a Certified User would reply. @heister or anyone else?
Lol according to Pat I am no longer a Certified User.
Now to the OP, we need more details.
Firms average age of holdings. Firms focus industry. Makes no sense to pitch a consumer goods pitch to a company that trades muni bonds.
The upside/downside analysis is based on creating Alpha. The point of the pitch is not to show you can analyze the company's numbers and show your analysis. It is to show a strategy to trade off of these numbers. If I was the investor I could care less about alot of the numbers. What I want to know is what trends, technicals, marco or micro indicators, or other indicators you plan on trading off of. The best advice I can give you not knowing specifics is don't assume that any information is neither to macro or micro to affect the company. If the business relies on large revolver credit lines to fund its day to day operations then things like a slight increase or decrease in interest rates could affect EPS for a quarter. Include these types of points briefly in your pitch. It will show that you have the ability to look beyond the published numbers and can foresee potential risks or benefactors from outside sources.
Good luck!
Failed Stock Pitch - Where did I go wrong? (Originally Posted: 11/28/2014)
I, along with my team, recently entered Harvard & Seeking Alpha's stock pitch competition. Our pitch was not selected as a finalist, and those that were have not been disclosed.
The stock is up 23% since the submission, and Seeking Alpha requested that they publish the pitch. Both of which are encouraging signs.
As this was my first pitch, where did I go wrong?
See attached PDF. Any input is welcomed.
PM it to me I'll take a look
Hey @ChimpDaddy great job - I think you are certainly on the right track and incorporated many elements that I commonly see in professional research. One issue is that your pitch is too macro - (ie; making a high level argument for sapphire but not so much for the company itself). Perhaps adding current sapphire market share of the company and competitors & where you see that going, current major customers and % of revenue to each, what projects they are currently involved in (short or long term?), growth strategy ie; how are they going get design wins, what their revenue breakout is by segment and where that is going and why, etc?
Also, you make a statement that gorilla glass may be overtaken by sapphire due to its "inferiority." This is probably the most important part of your pitch because gorilla glass is BY FAR the leader in the space and yet you don't elaborate. I'm not questioning whether your premise is correct or wrong, but you have to support the argument. Some ideas would be to address the lack of production scale vs gorilla, the cracking glass issues vs gorilla, the 10x cost vs gorilla, and how it compares to the new gorilla glass 4 line (supposedly stronger, harder, better, than any previous version).
From the financial review section, I would not go out on a limb for a company and say they are not a bankruptcy threat. We just saw GTAT blow through $500M cash so I hardly think $50M is inexhaustible. You state that they now have a "monopolistic" position but its hard for me to visualize since you did not break out the current state of the market (see above). FYI, there are other sapphire manufacturers than GTAT and RBCN.
As @Gcredit stated, I think the % gain of the stock is probably irrelevant for the competition they are looking at substance.
Again I think you did a good job and are on the right track, and my criticism is only meant to be constructive. Regards.
Stock going up big time doesn't mean your pitch was almost perfect. These kind of places look for an overall pitch that covers everything with focus on fundamentals.
I think you already posted the same in Trading forum. If it's already on Seeking Alpha, make it easier for users here by posting a PDF or some better option. The link you provided makes people register there....
Process over outcome
@"Gcredit" Thank you for your help, I have attached a PDF as per your recommendation.
I disagree with above. You did not do a very good job on this. I still have no idea WHY or HOW with respect to your thesis.
I don't know the word limits of this competition but there is no meat or substance in this write-up. Why is there a shortage in 2015, any trends/stats/data or edge you gained to come to this timing conclusion? Is ES2 patented and what are the other methods?
Don't just say things like "The downside for RBCN is very limited." How are you proving that? Strong B/S, great, but you mention negative earnings and a high capital intensive business, so how does an investor get comfortable with that, and what is the future use of cash in this business, can you break out capex? i.e. $50mm of cash is nothing if it costs me $100mm to operate.
Your title is "the time is right" based on a competitor going bankrupt. Need to flesh this out more, what happened and why will only RBCN benefit?
You mention a few competitors, who are they? Why is RBCN better? Your moats are 100% regarding new entrants, what about the current competitors? They obviously don't need to train technicians and they already paid the "high cost" to enter the market. What is the high cost? This is a small business, can any larger conglomerate crush them with $50mm of capex? This company is TINY, who has pricing power here, the suppliers or the manufacturers?
What's the TAM, market trends? Why is sapphire superior and historically how much market share have they taken from GLW? Just saying someone else is inferior isn't helpful.
The valuation section is not very helpful when you spend most of it talking historical share price and no one new to the company would know what that means since there's no context.
And other posters are right, in both stock competitions and interviews, the short-term result means nothing.
Its positive encouragement brah.. he doesnt need to through in the towel, just keep improving. He's probably a college kid thats looking for some guidance - not to get slammed.
I think you bought the dumb money thesis; hook, line, and sinker. You should have spent more time looking at GTAT & explained why they filed. I'm also not convinced you understand both the RBCN & GTAT business models. Here's some thoughts in no particular order:
I spent some time on GTAT, though I'm not even close to an expert. But I think this is a bad business/industry that is receiving a lot of investment currently. I think it will lead to overcapacity and demand/margin implosion. This could be staved off for a few years as adoption of sapphire increases/peaks.
How does this company make money? For example, GTAT, which you cited as a direct competitor, didnt actually manufacture/sell sapphire. They were a worthless middle-man contractor that bought sapphire furnace parts from manufacturers, arranged for shipping of those parts to the end location, and helped the buyer assemble the furnaces & get them running. Is this what RBCN does? or does RBCN actually own/operate furnaces & sell sapphire?
GTAT had tons of liquidity when they filed. They filed because they signed a large deal with Apple to provide furnaces, accepted $500mm+ of prepayments for the furnaces, and then couldnt deliver the furnaces as promised. Apple was going to sue for their money back, and they obviously didnt have the liquidity to repay. This hidden debt caused them to file, because they grew too fast while accepting massive prepays with a bad contract structure. It is also worth noting that GTAT's reorg plan will require them to liquidate the Apple furnace assets. This will create additional capacity. Can this market support significantly more production capacity?
I believe the majority of RBCN's business is selling sapphire that they produce (unlike GTAT). How do they sell these products? Contract? Spot? If its contract, what is the structure? Take-or-pay? Is pricing locked in? For how long? If its spot, why do you think volumes/pricing will remain stable despite the investment coming into the industry? Why does RBCN need to exist if Apple is willing to simply buy their own furnaces & manufacture their sapphire in-house?
Regarding your downside: if margins collapse due to new technology/competition or lack of demand (in-housing), the cash will disappear very quickly due to cash burn. Further, there would be no bid for the outdated furnaces/assets.
Conclusion: I dont think you understand the industry/comps; I think your downside is more realistically $0; and I think you whiffed on all the big issues (how they make money, and why they will keep making money)
I think Sanity Check and Cries pretty much nailed the important items. You don't have any summary financials which makes it impossible to evaluate quantitatively the qualitative claims in the thesis. I would also add on the Valuation section I wouldn't consider 15x EBITDA for a highly capital intensive business to be a "conservative" multiple.
My suggestions as below, definitely take with a pinch of salt. In a rush now so not going too deep. There is no perfect way to structure a pitch. You haven't mentioned what exactly and how deep you were supposed to go so I've made assumptions.
I've skipped commenting on valuation bit, lot's of other people here with more knowledge.
Thesis: Company being undervalued 'due to increase' part sounds wrong. I can see what you are trying to say but just a sentence construction issue I guess. Others may disagree.
Business Description: It helps to give in one line a split by divisions, revenues and profits as it quickly gives clarity when you mention specific products (i.e. you've mentioned 2-inch-diameter sapphire but I'm not sure what division it comes from and how profitable in terms of margins this product is)
The Opportunity in this market: Here you talk about competition and then just leave it there, not sure if I'm missing something.
Simply citing potential higher revenues and prices is okay but not enough - need to mention commentary from mgmt., competitors with a focus on margins (though I know you've commented below on higher margins). Remember margins are important - you can generate higher sales at the cost of margins.
Bankruptcy point is interesting but after reading I'm clueless why this happened? Regulation? competition? or something else? management screwed up?
Competition: Decent points. But every time people talk about almost no competition it doesn't feel right. One year period and high costs to enter the business are reasons not good enough in my opinion. Lot's of companies sitting on cash.
Business Fundamentals: Would have loved to see more of a comparison between a competitor with some basic ratios. Higher fixed cost for a small company can always be a big negative. Any comments on long-term contracts would have been helpful. Even if you don't have info, for a competition pitch like this one, would have been better to say at least something or make them aware that you know how important longer contracts are for a firm with higher fixed costs. OR, should have said something other than longer contracts as it's not always possible to secure them (you see, sort of a hedge?)
Note: The price was hit due to competition. I just felt you are being a bit too optimistic on your stock as one competitor is out. I know it sounds all well but as an analyst try not to be so excited. Use words carefully.
Overall I would say, tables and bullet points would have been better instead of chunks of text. Year on year growth with margins is always helpful. Some graphs if they were allowed.
I'd say decent job at your level but even for experienced analysts there is room for improvement so keep working at it. It's easy for me to criticise but I'm sure you've worked hard for this so don't let the rejection let you down. A lot of helpful users here and they will comment so listen to their advice and good luck.
I agree with the comments by @"SanityCheck" and @"Cries".
I think the problem with your report comes down to your research process. This report reads as if you threw 5 or 6 articles on RBCN into a blender and put it on paper. You'll have more success with your pitches if you build your ideas up from the bottom starting with their financials going back 3-6 years, and then forecasting the next 3 years (a rough operating model with a valuation and cash flow tab shouldn't take more than a couple hours), and then answer these questions in your pitch - here's how RBCN generates revenue, here's what drives revenue, here's why that driver will increase/decrease, etc.
A lot of your pitch relies on macro concepts to illustrate why now is the right time to buy, but once you have an idea of the companies intrinsic value you can make a lot stronger argument as to how a particular macro event could act as a catalyst causing a market overreaction that drives the share price down to an undervalued point.
Noimsayin?
Thank you for your candid input. I have made note of my errors and look forward to building a stronger pitch next time. I will share future pitches for feedback, best regards.
@"WhaleofWallStreet" @"SanityCheck" @"Cries" @"MilitaryToFinance" @"Jamoldo"
Assets don't go bankrupt, companies do. Equitize the debt and you just transfer capacity to a new operator = not the same as capacity rationalization.
Assets don't go bankrupt, companies do. Equitize the debt and you just transfer capacity to a new operator = not the same as capacity rationalization.
Lots of good feedback here. Would just add that even if you had written a fantastic pitch, it's a contest. Contests are subjective and not everyone gets to win. Doesn't mean you did a bad job, although in this case there was plenty of room for improvement.
Check out the winning pitches from HFAC. Learn from them. http://seekingalpha.com/article/2699455-the-long-case-for-consolidated-… http://seekingalpha.com/article/2678995-the-long-case-for-civeo
For me, the Tomoka pitch beats the Civeo pitch any day.
I think the responses here are great. But all in all, you have to remember that sometimes, especially in competitions, it's not you who performed poorly; it's the others who performed relatively better.
I have had a quick look at your thesis. As I do not cover this industry, I will not comment on whether your assumptions are justified are not. Instead I will focus on the general discussion of what constitutes as a good pitch.
1) At the very beginning of the pitch, you should mention what is your recommendation, is it a buy or sell? What is your target price? This is standard practice among industry research reports. As a fund manager, I don't want to spend 10 minutes digging into your thesis to find your conclusion, I want to see it immediately. 2) Why do you believe the market has mispriced this stock? I'm sure your finance courses have taught you about efficient market hypothesis, equity markets are generally pretty efficiently priced. Therefore, why is it that you think this stock has been mispriced by the market? Is it because you see extra growth upside for the company in which the market doesn't? If so, what is your justification for this extra growth and is it a reasonable assumption? 3) What are some of the catalysts required for the stock to move towards your target price? While in theory you may be right in that there are extra growth opportunities (just using it as an example), however the stock price will not move to your target price unless the market also changes their views about the growth prospects of the company. Therefore, what will it take before the market changes its mind and sees things your way? Maybe we need another competitor to exit the market? (and you have evidence to suggest that the other competitor will likely leave the market for whatever reason) 4) In terms of your valuation, you seem to be using industry average multiples to justify your valuation. However, as I mentioned earlier, companies generally trade at a certain price, and hence multiple for a reason. Therefore what is it about the company that makes you believe it deserves a re-rate and trade at the industry average multiple? This links to point 2) I made earlier. 5) It is good that you included the downside of investing in this stock. Many stock pitches by students I have seen often forget this. However your justification for your downside valuation is pinned on the assumption that the company would be able to sell its assets at 50% discount of book value. While I haven't looked at the balance sheet of this company, however some things to think about is do you believe 50% is a reasonable haircut? If a large proportion of the $144m assets are things like goodwill, or intangible assets such as patents, or even deferred tax liabilities, you may not get a penny from these kinds of things in a fire sale. Even if the assets are fixed assets like plant and machinery, given the specialized nature of the product the company produces, you may have to take a large haircut to get these sold, as buyers may have to spend many millions to renovate the site for other uses.
Overall I think your presentation has some decent content, however the way you present it needs to be improved and the assumptions you make should fit together with the story to make it more coherent. RIght now, my feeling is that you don't have a strong story nor do you have the numbers to back it up. If you can, try to get some broker reports and have a look at how people do a stock pitch in the industry. I suggest you also have a look at Professor Aswath Damodaran's stock pitches (you can find it on his blog) to have a look at how he does his valuations.
Fine job, but plenty of room for improvement. I'll dissect a few sentences from the bus fundamentals section.
" However, RBCN does currently suffer from negative earnings due to it being a capital intensive business. " - Why is this hurting earnings? Accelerated depreciation? Fixed costs vs revenue? Capex is a cash flow issue so not really sure if thats what you are trying to get at.
"This low revenue was also due to competition from a company,GTAT, which is now bankrupt." - What low revenue? You never mentioned low revenue before this quote. How much has revenue increased since GTAT went bankrupt if this event is the savior of our top line.
"These higher fixed costs have been consistent regardless of the last 3 years of revenue and will be overcome by the projected growth." -Again, you refer to "these" like you have mentioned fixed costs before, you haven't. Your logic needs to flow from one point to the next. "will be overcome by growth" is way too vague. Try something along the lines of "given current company guidance of 10% yoy revenue growth for the next 3 years and analyst estimates largely in line with this" yada yada yada. Because honestly, I don't give a shit if you think it will be overcome by growth, I care WHY you think it will be overcome by growth.
"This growth will ultimately lead to higher margins that were once realized by Rubicon." - What growth? Exactly what margins were once realized by Rubicon? How will growth bring back the margins? Lets see some numbers.
Also, at the end, you mentioned your expected 2015 rev and ebitda but I don't think you ever mentioned what current rev and ebitda is, thus I have no clue how far of a leap your projections for next year are when you start throwing on multiples to get a valuation. Also, I don't think you ever mentioned a % rev or ebitda growth in the entire pitch, in any capacity,...past growth, future growth..etc. You can't just say, the company has grown, will grow,..etc. We need numbers. I wrote this quickly and poorly, apologies for typos / bad structure.
The HF Pitch: condensing HF case/pitch into key points (Originally Posted: 11/09/2015)
WSO'ers, wanted to take some time out to help prospective IBD/ER candidates with a crucial part of the HF interview process. The Pitch. A lot of stress, pain, and angst goes into successfully (or unsuccessfully) navigating the pitch to a prospective PM. The below is what I found helpful after many interviews. There are small nuances to each PM/fund but these are the bare bone basics that must be addressed.
This structure (in my opinion) works well with both case studies as well as in person/over the phone pitches on investment ideas. Obviously the case will be a bit more detailed but these are good starting points.
1) Tell me about the company in 30 seconds. ,
- this can often times be the most difficult part of the pitch. As a PM, I essentially want to know in layman's terms, what is the industry they operate in? How do they generate revenue/profit? (subscription based? txn based? volume based?). - so many times candidates try and cram the entire 10-k into the pitch. If you go into too much detail, you've already lost your PM/Sr Analyst. CONDENSE. Get the 20% of the company that matters
2) What has happened over the last 4-8 quarters?
3) Your thesis
4) What is the market view and why am I different? - self explanatory
5) Why now?
6) Valuation / target price
7) Catalysts
8) Risks
I am writing this jetlagged and on less than 5 hrs of sleep. Open to criticism.
That's pretty generic and actually sounds a little drawn out. Number 4 is the key but also the hardest to pin down.
Intended to keep it that way. More than happy to go into detail but in my mind those are the key points that absolutely must be addressed.
From someone who's been on the interviewer side of the table, these are pretty much 100% accurate. +1
Give them just enough to maintain interest, then secure their money
Eaque possimus quidem hic alias neque voluptatem. Perspiciatis velit optio odio enim est fugit minima. Sit ut sapiente necessitatibus rerum ut molestiae vero aut. Dolore fugiat consectetur hic. Molestiae alias dolorem totam impedit dolorum tenetur.
See All Comments - 100% Free
WSO depends on everyone being able to pitch in when they know something. Unlock with your email and get bonus: 6 financial modeling lessons free ($199 value)
or Unlock with your social account...
Vel sed qui voluptatem esse sapiente numquam aut eum. Consequatur corrupti et ea maxime non modi ipsa. Repellat eaque molestiae natus natus vel voluptas ut. Omnis vel veritatis et voluptatem.
Earum minus aut aliquam ipsum nemo. Doloribus sunt aliquam iure molestiae laboriosam quia. Aut sunt quidem tempore sit harum eligendi. Consequatur cum et sit ut. Sed neque itaque voluptatum sed explicabo fugiat temporibus. Id sint eum veritatis ex natus sunt. Ullam et beatae non.
Asperiores reiciendis incidunt sunt ut voluptates enim. Magni fuga rem omnis eum ea deserunt est. Error atque est repellendus saepe ipsam. Voluptas neque dolorem amet inventore dolor.
Nam rerum dolorum qui cumque debitis exercitationem. Dolor sunt id qui assumenda ut laudantium. Expedita in est perferendis optio. Ut facere et atque accusamus occaecati. Occaecati esse ut nihil.
Quod iure ea illum sit et sapiente omnis. Quia dolorum est veritatis repellendus natus fugiat fugiat atque. Est est hic sint rerum inventore cupiditate ex. Sunt deserunt sit sit rem et recusandae. Ratione voluptatibus totam natus.
Natus et iste et voluptas nemo quibusdam sint. Aut et veritatis voluptas nostrum voluptatem quia dicta. Id repudiandae quisquam quas corporis adipisci quaerat. Pariatur minima ut sapiente blanditiis sapiente. Aliquid quia culpa voluptatem tempora error quas dolor.
Est iusto veniam saepe eum quisquam. Ipsam iste molestias voluptas ea. Ut laudantium quas ullam blanditiis. Ut ea quo vel.