College Rankings for IBD in NYC:

Based on placement in NY, not on academics. Things can vary, but this is a solid list for people trying to get to schools with consistent placement:

Wharton
Harvard
Columbia
Yale
U Chicago
NYU
Cornell
Princeton
Stanford
MIT
Dartmouth
Brown
Northwestern
UVA
Notre Dame
Duke
Emory
Lehigh
Georgetown
Michigan
UT Austin
UNC
Claremont McKenna
Vanderbilt
Penn State
Villanova
Middlebury
Indiana
U of Florida
Fordham
Texas A&M
Georgia
Wake Forest
SMU
Boston College
Minnesota
USC
Michigan State
Ohio State
U of Illinois
Missouri
Rutgers
FSU
Iowa
Alabama
Ole Miss
Arizona State

 

Big Ten and SEC schools with huge alumni bases (and schools with nationally recognized sports programs) are pretty underrated. They obviously don’t place a ton of folks but when I worked in IB I was still a little surprised at how folks were willing to go to bat for a Big Ten/SEC/Big 12 kid.

Over the years I’ve met handfuls of kids from Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Iowa at different networking events. Mostly from regional offices.

 

I agree. I've seen a lot of state schools, like you mentioned, and the top kids there do just as good of a job. They're usually very passionate, technically proficient, and fun to work with.

Have seen and worked with across many cities.

 

Just imagine how low per capita BB placement is at these schools with hoards and hoards of finance kids 

lets take Rutgers for example. 10k kids per class, assume 25% are finance -> 2.5k

of course not all will recruit for IB, but let’s not get too complicated. 
 

say, conservatively (it’s probably less), 25 kids place BB or EB each year…

thats 1%

 

I understand your math, and you arent wrong. However, what you have to understand is that kids at non-target state schools don't live and breathe finance. They are more interested in figuring out how they are going to get laid this weekend than why their corpfin professor didn't like their WACC assumptions. 90% of kids don't know or care about what IB is and end up in F500 rotational programs, no name consulting, big 4, etc. At my big10, nearly everyone who put in strong effort to get an offer got one at at least a regional bank like 5/3 or something with most getting solid MM or BB/EB.

 

Okay, some of your assumptions are off if Rutgers is comparable. At my Big 10 school (Wisconsin), only about 1 of 6 students is admitted into the business school. About 1100 each year, so roughly 5000 out of 30ish thousand total students. Of those 1100, 300 received a finance degree in the latest school year with data. And of those 300, I’m counting probably 30 in Banking, 5 S&T, a few direct investing roles, 5ish equity research. So let’s say 40/300 so 13% of finance majors break into high finance each year. And then in other programs like engineering and economics, the percentage is far lower, but probably 5 engineers end up in some high finance role and probably 10 economics majors (including yours truly) break into front office finance roles. So total number of 55 split across banking, ER, S&T, and direct investing. Roughly half place into NY offices despite the Midwest location so maybe 20ish to New York.

Side note, if we include Real Estate majors from Wisconsin, then these numbers would increase for real estate private equity, debt shops, life co.’s, etc. but this is the best measurement for pure front office finance.

So 13.33% of finance majors, 2.7% of business students, and .2% of all students break into front office roles from Wisconsin.

 

Junior here who did a ton of research back when weighing HYP vs. full-ride RU.

I think your numbers are way off. Their business school's enrollment totaled 8k in 2021. 2k per class @ 25% finance means 500 prospects. Assuming 25 placements / 500 = 5%.

Definitely low, but I'd argue you're using the wrong benchmark -- it's better to look at those who self-select for IB. Blankly saying that target placement is >50% underestimates targets since, at least from my experience at HYP, 95% of those who want an offer get it (5% for unlucky outliers). If placement really was only >50%, going to a target would be no better than a slightly-weighted coin toss.

It also underestimates nontargets. My high school friends at RU tell me their high-finance club sees attendance from ~100 per class. Those 100 actually self-selected, so 25 / 100 = 25%.

 

That being said, I don't see many of those kids (besides Michigan, Vanderbilt, etc) send much to NYC. Regional offices? Sure, I believe that, but I'm sure it's still dominated by local powerhouses like Duke, Vanderbilt, Michigan, Chicago, Northwestern, etc

 

It’s statistically so hard to make it to NYC IB from one of those schools. If you’re one of the handful of kids who make it out of those massive undergrad business school, you must be exceptional at something. Maybe you’re exceptionally well connected or exceptionally lucky, but you have to be in the 99th percentile of some trait to be the one who gets to the street.

 

So? Exceptional people get exceptional jobs, these kids often just can’t afford Ivy leagues, or didn’t study SAT enough. I’ve interviewed them many times. They know their banks, technicals, and are very interested in the space.

It’s not an anomaly, these schools places very well every year. May be a large school, but only like 50 want to do banking in NY though. It’s comparable.

 

seeing arizona state on the same list as harvard is a disgrace

 

This list is pretty shit considering all the party schools but would add more of the NESCACs (they all place pretty well) and some of the elite STEM/engineering schools that don’t have a huge IB alum presence but have the prestige for kids who do want to do IB to place (MIT, JHU, CMU, Georgia tech, even Rice) plus some others (WashU, Tufts, Wake, Tulane)

 
Controversial
  1. Wharton/Harvard
  2. Yale/Columbia/Dartmouth
  3. Princeton/Cornell/Chicago/MIT/Brown/Stanford/Northwestern/Duke/etc
  4. ND/UVA/Stern/Georgetown/Michigan/Vanderbilt/Williams/USC/JHU/etc
  5. UT Austin/UNC/Emory/etc
  6. CMC/Middlebury/CMU/Rice/WashU/etc
  7. Lehigh/PSU/Villanova/Indiana/Florida/etc

Realistically, it's more like this, for any high schoolers actually interested. This is mostly based on per placement capita, interest from the student body and % of IB classes. Of course, I think I'm mixing in a bit of buy-side prowess in here, but that would be a whole different list, with WHPD making up the top 4. Just my 2 cents as my team's recruiting lead. 

 

Thanks! I think a lot of these rankings are done by undergrads and high schoolers who treat opinion on this forum like fact. Figured it would be good to showcase how analysts/associates think when we lead recruiting efforts. 

It's also important to note that a lot of the schools in the first three tiers are also shifting away from IB, which a lot of high schoolers obviously don't know about.

 
Most Helpful

Georgetown should be in 3rd bucket at the lowest if you're going by the number of FT analysts they produce each year...They place a similar number to Harvard/Wharton. It's likely they send more FT analysts to NY than MIT, Brown, Stanford, Northwestern, and Duke. NYU is also missing and should be in 2nd or 3rd.

 

No, you're right. Georgetown does send a lot, especially from their business school. I think by my metrics of general student interest and per placement capita, I think they're pretty in line with Cornell and Chicago in the third tier. I actually did have NYU (as Stern) in the 4th tier, but that was more of an arbitrary drop because of the quality of their placement per capita, compared to the schools in the third tier and up. Of course, this all can be argued either way, but just my thoughts and viewpoints.

 

Not really for IB in NYC. In terms of pure numbers, they're not that common. I see them a lot on the quant side though, which makes sense due to the presence of Booth and its availability to undergrads.

 

Wharton
Yale
U Chicago

USC

UNC

SMU
Cornell
Dartmouth

Michigan
UVA
Notre Dame
Georgetown

NYU
UT Austin
Penn State
Indiana
Boston College
Michigan State
Rutgers
Alabama
Arizona State

there fixed it for you

H P S and M placing well is a fucking joke. Penn State places more than all 4 of those shitters combined. UVA, USC, UMich, Notre Dame and Georgetown are hyper-dominant.

 

Not at any of these schools but got an offer at a very respectable firm. Moral of the story, don’t get your self so stressed about getting into the right school for banking that you let it eat up your life. Choose where you want to go to school based on where you see yourself developing most as a person while simultaneously having the most fun. If you are a motivated, bright individual you can get a job in IB without following the path that most people on this forum stress out about. I’m not saying don’t factor a banking presence into your decision if it’s very important to you, but idk how anyone in high school could really even have that knowledge… just make a holistic decision and you will end up happiest. Hope this can help any high school kid stressing about finding the perfect path to employment and life already.

 

I don’t have a problem with any of the schools listed in this thread, but because this is WSO people get upset when anyone claims that a few kids from a school like Rutgers or Ohio State break in because it makes their chosen profession seem less selective/prestigious.

I’ve worked with kids from the usual targets like HYPSW, semi-targets and even non targets like Texas A&M and nobody cares about your school once you step foot into the office. The ones that do care (even after you’re on the job) are usually not the people you want to work with anyway.

When I worked in IB, one of the MD’s was an Ohio State grad. We ended up interviewing an Ohio State kid for a summer analyst role and as you’d expect the kid got push back from HYP guys despite checking all the boxes from GPA, technicals, and social skills. He got a shot and surprise surprise, he performed no differently than the other kids from better schools. Not saying this will be the case for every non-target/semi-target but the ones that do make it are usually there for a reason.

 

I agree with your general sentiment, but disagree with this idea that your school doesn’t matter once you set foot in the office / do good work / build a track record. People have and will always assume your intelligence based on what school you went to, even if it’s not true (often times isn’t true, there are morons at Ivies and geniuses at non-targets). Going to a good school also helps you have a stronger network and fit in better with the “elite” crowds. You’re always better off going to a better school if you can afford it.

 

Is this a joke? Sure the Corsair society is good, but it’s not even close to the level of Vandy. Vandy places well at every BB and most EBs. Vandy has OCR for almost all BBs. UGA has no OCR. UGA is a good school and getting better but it’s not better than Vandy in anything but football. 
Source: Work with multiple Vandy alum

 

Honestly, since COVID started and the exodus of analysts began, IB recruitment is not that hard. Have mentored a number of people from unknown non-targets who have gotten top offers with decent GPAs and ECs. Most solid students at targets and semi-targets are aiming for tech or consulting, and if they like finance, they’ll shoot for some form of the buyside

 

This is a very antidotal ST observation/ effect. LT careers in finance are higher paying, so candidates will go for IB/ PE. May have been a little easier for non-core kids due to virtual recruiting though.

 

Went to Lehigh, broke in post MBA...honestly don't think the school prepares students well for interviews. I will always make time for a kid from Bethlehem but frankly, the majority of them have left me pretty disappointed just from their sheer lack of understanding of the banking world and lack of preparation.  Most of them seem to get all of their information from WSO, which completely distorts reality. I work for a group that places PE really well and is super targeted by people on this site, and we're absolutely not elitest when it comes to alma mater if the kid gets recommended for a first round, but when they can't even answer the basics or anything beyond a memorized accounting question, it's pretty damn disappointing.  

And in no universe is Lehigh higher than Michigan when it comes to analyst recruiting. We on-campus recruit at like...5 schools, all the ones you would guess and Michigan is one of them. 

 

Doloribus error non aperiam veritatis tempore. Aut doloremque et non excepturi hic quasi. Error assumenda voluptas et eligendi quia omnis libero.

 

Repellat possimus ut quaerat placeat unde totam et eveniet. Odit quaerat expedita et velit vel odit sit. Dolor cum aut nostrum quas dolore illum. Excepturi et adipisci et. Vel numquam et expedita similique nihil eos itaque. Aut iste nulla dolor non quis minima ullam.

 

Voluptatem eum fuga ut minus ullam ut. Autem ipsum sint id facere. Voluptas commodi tempore corrupti molestias nam voluptas et. Blanditiis numquam quo illo. A similique et voluptatibus sed laborum deserunt laborum.

Reprehenderit sed nostrum alias quo sint id. Esse iure est beatae ut laboriosam doloremque dolores. Quidem omnis assumenda maiores tempora totam dolorem.

Modi distinctio autem quia harum. Numquam officiis et fugiat corporis deserunt nihil. Ducimus expedita sed est deserunt.

Cum rem illo iste hic. Qui esse doloribus magni distinctio minima illum optio sunt. Non ipsum similique pariatur dolor aperiam omnis.

 

Quia vel accusamus sequi itaque. Cumque rerum nulla quis eos. Ex quod placeat id unde deserunt explicabo. Rerum omnis est autem ea earum.

Excepturi est nobis maiores omnis placeat vitae repellat sed. Nostrum et molestiae nesciunt consectetur. Est ad facilis est rerum.

Aut consequatur vitae dolor dicta qui et. Consequatur quibusdam tempore in dolor harum repellat minus. Et qui voluptatibus ut magnam laudantium. Quod in impedit perspiciatis. Odio sed dolorem in mollitia ipsam culpa a. Accusamus qui illum iste quia ducimus ut et corrupti. Cupiditate inventore rerum totam laboriosam atque.

I think I did this right

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”