This is right. There are some other comments saying the new corrected (and higher) D&A increases EBITDA, which is wrong. It was never part of EBITDA.

Maybe not the toughest question but apparently tough enough to fool some people based on the comments.

I actually saw a short thesis recently from a hedge fund, and the thesis was essentially "this company is overstating D&A and thus overstating EBITDA". They were correct that the company is indeed overstating D&A, i.e. they are aggressively depreciating assets and creating an arguably inflated D&A. But it was clearly incorrect to say this increases EBITDA.

 

How in-depth are you supposed to go with that? I feel like I have a basic understanding of LBO, but will fuck it up if I get grilled on something I say.

 

the hard part with this isn't the initial explanation (which I would hope most people recruiting would know), but the follow up questions. I've had interviews where they get pretty specific in follow ups, and you really need to understand what's going on with an LBO (not just memorize a good answer to 'walk me through an lbo') to be able to answer.

 
Most Helpful

I would actually disagree with the answer provided the WACC bottoms out at some point where you get the optimal capital structure then it comes back up again.

Yes, debt is cheaper and will always be cheaper than equity, but the cost of debt isn't static. As you take on more debt, the marginal cost of debt increases because of added risk. Similarly, the required rate of return on equity will also increase as higher leverage on the same asset beta increases equity beta. Thus, coming from 0 debt, you reach an optimal WACC and past that you should have WACC increasing again

 

It’ll look like a “V”. As the proportion of D/E gets larger, the WACC decreases because the proportion of debt, which is a cheaper form of capital, becomes greater. However, there is an inflection point at which the proportion of D/E becomes too great and the firm suffers financial distress. Then the WACC increases.

 

Not necessarily, it will certainly decrease WACC in the sense that you are placing more weight on rd, but I think that the leverage effect is far greater on the equity side. If D/E increases, Beta increases (now you have a hell of a lot more systematic risk to deal with). If Beta increases, the cost of equity increases too. Also, rd doesn’t stay constant and this is not a linear relationship. As leverage increases, rd will increase, and so will WACC.

 

Too easy, WACC decreases at first so downward sloping and then will begin to slope upward at a higher levels of leverage so almost like U-shape.

 

Technicals will never be that hard. Maybe work on some tougher problems. Which companies are the most undervalued right now. What sectors will drive M&A. What will happen to the money supply as we face a deflationary environment and aggressive money-printing at the same time. You probably have classmates trying to tackle these things right now because they learned long ago that technicals aren't hard.

 

All these questions are a joke lol. Still straight out the shitty guides cmon. Can I have a challenge up in here, please?

 

How do you account for underfunded pension liabilities in an LBO model?

 

how do u do a liquidation valuation? feels like none of the guidebooks touch on it in detail

 

RX interview at my EB involved no numbers outside of a waterfall question. It was very qualitative, for example I would focus less on learning how liquidation analysis is done and more on why it’s done and when it’s used

 

Well golly would you look at that. Now that's what I call a question!

 

Check out IB Vine, https://ibvine.io/practice, has a lot of good "Outside the Guide" questions for practice.

Here's a sample one from the above website that may not be that difficult, but I feel is good nonetheless (this was from a JPM interview):

What is the market cap for a company that has...

  • $2bn in assets
  • 3x Debt to Equity
  • 2x P / BV...
Array
 

Correct @froggoboggowoggo. Here's a few more from the same website that I found to be good practice:

A. A company has 10,000 shares at $20 a share. There are 100 call options at an exercise price of $10, 50 restricted stock units (RSUs) and 100 convertible bonds at a price of $10 and par value of $100. What is the diluted equity value?


B. MULTI-STEP: Assuming a 20% tax rate, walk me through 3 statements with a:

Year 0: Buy Land for $90 using cash on hand. Walk through the 3 statements.

Year 2: Straight-line depreciation occurs over a 10-year period. After two years, you sell the land for $90. Walk through the 3 statements after the sale of land.


C. How does ____ affect Enterprise Value?

Raise $200m in Debt, use cash to buy a new piece of equipment.


D. MULTI-STEP: Assuming a 20% tax rate, walk me through 3 statements with a:

You raise $100 debt with 5% interest and 10% yearly principal repayment. You use that money to purchase $100 of short-term assets that have 10% yearly interest income attached.

Part 1) Right when you raise the debt and purchase short term assets, walk me through the 3 statements.

Part 2) After one year, walk me through the 3 statements.


E. Assuming a 30% tax rate, walk me through 3 statements with a:

$100 interest expense (50% cash interest / 50% PIK interest) and $50 interest income


F. 5 things a company can do with cash?


Array
 

Hardest technicals definitely came at 2 of the EB's I superdayed with (1 in chicago, 1 in NY). Notably, one of them gave me a list of numbers and asked me to calculate 5 or 6 different metrics, then asked me to explain what type of company this was likely from and how I could tell. Another sat me down and gave me an excel template for a very specific type of industry model, had me fill it in, answer 5 or 6 short answer written response questions about the industry, trends, and some critical thinking. The real catch, though, was on the model template, there were some intentional errors (formatting, the word assumptions spelled wrong, some hidden cells/rows/columns w/ white text in them). Big takeaway here was a combo of knowledge and genuine attention to details; nothing is ever as straightforward as it seems, take all the time given to you.

 

The hardest technicals I got during some of my SA interviews were not really questions, but instead case studies, or multiple questions asked in a row? Any question can start off fairly easy, but then its up to the interviewer to decide how far they want to grill you on that particular topic. For instance, a beginning question could be "walk me through an LBO?" (fairly simple question) but then they can start asking you specifics about the debt schedule and how that affects the fcf available to pay down debt.

 

So ebitda is initially $20 and total costs are $80.
Of this $80, $32 is fixed (40%) and $48 is variable (60%). So if volume increases by 10%, then variable costs increase by $4.80 (10%$48). The $10 increase in revenue (10%$100) less the $4.80 increase in variable costs means a $5.20 increase in ebitda. So new ebitda is $20 + $5.20 = $25.20 ?

Is this the right way to approach this question?

 

Yup, again, not the most difficult but it's a bit different than the standard guide questions and tests whether you understand the cap structure.

I'll give you one more similar one:

Firm currently is trading at a multiple of 5x EV/EBITDA with 300 in Senior Debt and 400 in Junior Debt

EBITDA of 100

What is the Junior Debt trading at?

Array
 

Yeah not hard but when you are under pressure I can see why you would get nervous.

The key to this question is to immediately recognize that the equity/EBITDA multiple is the difference between 10x and 4x, which is 6x. You also would need to assume that the company has 0 cash, so you can simply add debt to equity to arrive at EV.

 

I once calculated that for the number of barbers needed in my town of 100,000 people, each barber cutting hair for 8 hours a day, with everyone getting their hair cut 6 times per year, and a few other metrics, that we would need ~30,000 barbers.

Yup, I said that 1 in 3 people were barbers. So I’d estimate around 16 trillion bricks probably

Update: there is no legitimate answer. The point is that you're supposed to calculate it out loud. They want to see that you can do either a "top-down" or a "bottoms-up" approach to a problem, and they want to see how you think. Get a sense of humor, rather than throwing MS at me.

 

This, even if meant as a joke.

I don't think I've ever dinged someone for getting a technical wrong (general financial incompetence is another story). But for 90% of people who are eventually dinged, I know within the first 2 minutes based on how they tell their story.

 

It had a little humor implied, largely because i knew that wasn't what was being asked, but yeah, for many it's a difficult question. Also "why IB?" You can know the 3 statements inside and out, accretion/dilution, LBO, etc. But if you can't sell the "why you" and "why this" it's a non-starter. And aside from memorizing generic answers, that can be exceedingly more difficult than the technicals.

 

Hey - bit of a serious question to you here (if you have time). What do people look for when asking this? I generally give a run through of my education, my roles, and a bit of the deals I've done. Concise and c.1 minute - I've never gotten a negative reaction but not sure if there's room in these sort of Qs to tilt the odds in my favor.

 

The hardest I got was with Moelis:

Imagine you have 2 Companys that produce complementary products with market share A and market share B. Now imagin that the second company buys Company B in an all cash deal. The market share of company C is higher than that of B and A and C also produces a complementary product. The margins of company B and C are about 25% EBIT and that of A is about 20%. What will possibly happen in these new oligopolistic market regarding margins and would you suggest Company C to use all cash or rather an all stock deal

 

My answer (not 100%): Margins would increase because of the consolidation of market share with Company C, which means first-mover advantage is higher for C. Regarding cash vs. stock dilemma, it's up the acquirer. Totally depends on costs associated with each option, and the potential future actions of A (which could require cash-on-hand to counteract).

 

With a higher market share and margin I pursue a winner take all market and sell the deal based on my outer vision. Because my margins are good, I reckon I trade close to where target trades, perhaps even above given my higher market share, so an all stock deal won't be as dilutive as you might think.

With a large increase in market share and a lower margin competitor, I offer an all stock deal and invest cash on balance sheet to invest more aggressively in growth. I also lower my prices and cut out A from the market given that my combined scale will likely give me a competitive advantage

 

One of the best LBO-specific technicals I came across:

Company A has revenues of 100 with 0% growth and a 20% EBITDA margin. You acquired company A 3 years ago and will sell it after 5 years total holding period (2 years until exit). You are now offered two options:

1) One-time working capital improvement of 130 in year 4

2) Margin increase to 30% in year 4 and 5

This is all information you are given, however you need more data to answer the question, that you specifically have to ask for.

 

Making sure that you understand the relationship between P/E ratio, EPS, and Earnings yield, or, Earnings Yield = EPS / Price = 1 / (P/E Ratio). Also seeing if you can apply those relationships in a non-typical stock example, and make assumptions to get to a reasonable answer. Helpful since, at a high level, the concept of earnings yield is useful for comparing the yield between different types of assets.

 

Once had an interview at a top BB for a SA position. After walking the interviewer through LBO, comps, DCF etc, crushed it. Then she asked me to do 3/8 in my head (=0.375). I had no idea how to do a simple fraction in my head which I hadn't done since the third grade. Didn't get the offer.

Life's too short to smoke cheap cigars.
 

Have been through a bunch of them in my interviewing experience. Adding a few (apart from the textbook Qs) for now 1. (Research/consulting business) Which 3 ratios would you employ to whittle down a list of 100 stocks to 10 to do a deeper dive to invest in? 2. When modelling a DCF, how do you account for the cyclical nature, for say, an Auto business? How will you figure out the stage of cycle to begin your projections with? 3. You've worked with due diligence advisors on the deals mentioned. As a buy side investor, how would the key focus areas /nuances differ when reviewing an internet business like Uber, to say, a mature tech services company?

 

would be interested in hearing your thoughts for the first 2 as well

 

Don’t remember exact numbers. Part A) you have a company with $250mm EBITDA and $1000mm of debt. If non-distressed comps trade at 6x, how do we price this company’s debt? Part B) Now, let’s say the debt is tranched out into a $400mm line of credit (1st lien secured) and the rest is unsecured notes. How is each tranche priced?

Array
 

I gotta say the standard for technicals for summers has gotten so crazy high from just 7-10 years ago haha. Interviewers - please, if someone doesn't get something right don't be a dick about it and either walk them through the solution or just move on to the next one. No need to wonder out loud why someone didn't get it right or be condescending about it.

 

Not a hard question, but if you just memorize the guides this would be a throw-off:

WACC is cost of equity and cost of debt, so if we are trying estimate a company's cost of equity that has business operations in Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and Dubai, how will you calculate it and why would you use those calculations?

If you understand cost of equity then this shouldn't be too hard of a problem.

 

So cost of equity = risk free rate + Beta * Equity Risk Premium

The risk free rate is going to be different in each country, and it's going to be higher than the rate in the US because there is more risk that the country defaults on its debt (also political risks). Get the risk free rate by adding a premium on top of the US risk free rate (think this is called default spread). Also, the equity risk premium is going to be higher in these countries. Get the beta for the company and solve for the cost of equity in each country. Finally, calculate the blended cost of equity by weighting each cost of equity by how much of the company's operations are conducted in each country. 

How'd I do boss. 

 

Inventore et repellat et quos. Aut rerum cum non ipsa. Aut molestias maxime consequatur. Cumque quod distinctio quos dolorum qui facilis unde. Voluptas nulla ratione dolorum omnis. Rerum eaque ut nulla magni ut voluptas. Aut incidunt debitis inventore in tenetur.

Nulla non et veniam qui eius ut sed. Similique dolore perferendis dolores architecto praesentium ad. Dignissimos vero voluptatem quae sit. Est aut saepe maiores iure. Et voluptatem esse qui cupiditate ut voluptatem.

 

Aspernatur tempore nesciunt ad. Quia facilis ea officia possimus accusantium ab. Ea quia sed vel nemo soluta.

Doloribus quaerat et facere voluptates. Facere at aut omnis mollitia. Vel aliquam quia odit enim tenetur quibusdam. Voluptatum sunt ut recusandae expedita minus quas aut reprehenderit. Saepe libero aut consequatur animi fugiat non id.

Magnam pariatur quo voluptatibus rerum. Officia occaecati impedit error natus maxime hic tenetur. Veniam voluptatem est molestias quas voluptatem. Qui enim eligendi nobis voluptate eos maxime aut.

 

Atque sed voluptate eligendi et optio aut molestiae quis. Qui molestiae sit distinctio quas. Sunt dolores laudantium non maxime et. Est minus perspiciatis autem ut impedit eos molestiae.

Aperiam facere quasi ut consequuntur alias veniam unde. Dolor ea qui architecto dolorem quasi.

Est quis laboriosam aliquid cum quaerat. Laudantium ipsam officiis nihil beatae. Nostrum sequi et aperiam aut.

 

Magnam consequatur architecto provident soluta laudantium possimus nihil. Quia molestiae tempore suscipit possimus at reprehenderit veritatis.

Nesciunt molestiae minus qui corrupti dolorem id voluptate. Eum veritatis ea id reiciendis. Recusandae corporis et ut quod optio voluptatum doloribus. Minima atque ullam aut nobis officiis quis neque. Nam occaecati doloremque voluptatem aut dignissimos excepturi. Rerum temporibus deserunt eaque doloremque quod quos accusamus ut. Odit voluptatibus quis velit ratione.

Nam molestiae harum magni. Et vel voluptatem ullam est consequatur dignissimos. Qui sapiente quo atque. Inventore voluptatibus veniam animi omnis minima quis rerum quasi.

 

Quia debitis voluptas corrupti unde iste. Nihil voluptatem accusamus et tenetur placeat libero blanditiis. Possimus et est reiciendis nobis iusto et esse. Consequuntur nulla et autem sit error. Natus perspiciatis dolorem aliquid labore dolores voluptatem autem. Necessitatibus pariatur officiis nostrum aspernatur possimus rerum est.

Ad sint nam aliquam fuga fugit nemo. Est excepturi molestiae libero ex. Quam qui voluptas aut vero. Debitis qui impedit voluptatem voluptate accusantium omnis.

Career Advancement Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Jefferies & Company 02 99.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 19 98.8%
  • Harris Williams & Co. (++) 98.3%
  • Lazard Freres 02 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 03 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Harris Williams & Co. 18 99.4%
  • JPMorgan Chase 10 98.8%
  • Lazard Freres 05 98.3%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.7%
  • William Blair 03 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Lazard Freres 01 99.4%
  • Jefferies & Company 02 98.8%
  • Goldman Sachs 17 98.3%
  • Moelis & Company 07 97.7%
  • JPMorgan Chase 05 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

March 2024 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (5) $648
  • Vice President (19) $385
  • Associates (86) $261
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (13) $181
  • Intern/Summer Associate (33) $170
  • 2nd Year Analyst (66) $168
  • 1st Year Analyst (202) $159
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (144) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
7
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
8
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
9
kanon's picture
kanon
98.9
10
numi's picture
numi
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”