[2026] Unbiased Prestige Rankings

S++ : PJT RSSG, EVR RX/M&A, GS TMT, CVP HC, Q

S+ : GS FIG, MOE LA, MS MENLO/M&A, CVP (rest)

S : MOE/RX/HC, JPM HC/M&A, GS (classics)

S- : PWP HC/RX, PJT M&A, MOE (rest), HL RX, Lazard PE&I/HC, JPM (rest), MS (rest), Lazard (rest), GS (rest), Allen&Co

A+ : BofA FSG/M&A, Barc PU&I/TECH/HC/FSG, Citi M&A/IND/FSG, PWP (rest)

A : BofA REGL, LionTree, Gordon Dyal, Ducera

A- : BofA (rest), Citi (rest), Barc (rest)

B+ : Guggenheim, UBS GIG/LevFin/IND, Jefferies, Greenhill, Macquarie IEC, RBC PU&I

B : Rothschild, DB FSG/LevFin/REGL/IND, BMO M&M/M&A, RJ CR (Financo), DB (rest), William Blair HC, UBS (rest), RBC, Macquarie

B- : Cain Brothers, Wells Fargo, BMO (rest), Piper Sandler CR

C+ : Piper Sandler (rest), Harris Williams, TD Cowen HC/TECH, RJ (rest), Baird, FTP

C : Solomon Partners, KBW FIG, Oppenheimer & Co., TD Cowen (rest), Nomura, BNP Paribas,

D : KBW, Lincoln International, HSBC, Cantor Fitzgerald, Mizuho, Stifel, MUFG, KeyBanc

F : BGL

115 Comments
 

db (levfin etc) and db rest in same tier, hl m&a missing, plz fix

 

lol one of the better groups for training and getting high quality deal experience, no matter which team you end up with, whether it is media & comm., tech (NYC or Menlo), HC, industrials, energy etc - EVR is consistently landing big ticket deals across all these industries 

 

Placing it along pjt rssg, gs tmt, q, cvp hc seems a bit high. Not saying it isnt very good, but probably not the same level of those

 

Overall yeah for sure. Only exception is EVR TMT NYC is insane. Super lean (they pick the top analysts in the summer class for FT since internship is generalist) and they cover all the coolest media tech deals out there. Outside of TMT I’d place the rest of EVR M&A in the tier just below Q/PJT RSSG/GS TMT

 

PWP always gets glazed on this forum lmao. Everything PWP should be moved at least down 1 tier. Exits have been awful. And Guggenheim should def be in line with rest of Barc. 

 

This. Most overrated firm on the street, not clear what their trajectory is

 

based on prestige, GUGG and GHL should be A-

LionTree should be higher IMO, btw where is Raine?

Only Barc PUI should be A+, rest are a tier below 

 
Most Helpful

WF(rest) should be at least B (#7 in US M&A table). Groups like REGL(ranked #2 in transaction volume)/Levfin/IND shld rank at least B+. IND has worked on 5/10 largest industrial deal this year, including the 80bns railroad merger (coadvisors with MS). Macquaire, RBC, and BMO way lag behind WF's both current and future momentum. 

 

dont get the hype around industry boutiques like Allen & Co, Ducera (little to non-existent M&A deal flow in 2025), Dyal, and LionTree. Also no one outside of finance know them as well.

 

Allen & Co on Netflix x Warner Brothers, Pfizer x Metsera, Portland Trail Blazers, Getty x Shutterstock, Doordash x Deliveroo, Cox x Liberty, etc just in 2025

LionTree on Paramount x Skydance, TPG x DirecTV, etc in the last 18 months

lol

 

Allen&Co and Liontree maybe different, but Allen&Co is definitely not on the same prestige level as GS(rest), which is just general perception at my target school. Ducera actually did no meaningful M&A, same goes to Dyal. 

 

I'd argue that S++ should only include PJT Restructuring, CVP HC and Q. Then I'd put the rest of the S++ names in S+, and also throw in MS Media & Comms

 

Dyal should be higher up the list. Have been on some massive transactions this year, while still operating under the radar

 

Malu we ling mataduwape swefumewa leme ta-meh aieu ta sarawanatintin

 

GUGG and GHL definitely hard done. Idk many people taking DUC > GUGG RX

 

Top and bottom tiers are accurate. 

Middle A/B tiers are inaccurate and more representative of 2-3 years ago. BofA and UBS are too high (BofA pays like shit and doesn’t care about IB, UBS is a disorganized dumpster fire post-merger). 

Baird and WF are ranked too low, no one with a brain is taking  Macquarie, UBS, or DB over them. They should be B/B+

 

RBOB_squarepants

Top and bottom tiers are accurate. 

Middle A/B tiers are inaccurate and more representative of 2-3 years ago. BofA and UBS are too high (BofA pays like shit and doesn’t care about IB, UBS is a disorganized dumpster fire post-merger). 

Baird and WF are ranked too low, no one with a brain is taking  Macquarie, UBS, or DB over them. They should be B/B+

everyone takes DB over wells fargo though

 

In what world is WF same tier as Cain and BMO, and below WB & RJ lmao. In terms of deal flow and momentum from this year alone, they are at least B+ or higher.

 

CVP too high, analysts can’t hit MFPE no matter how hard they try. Most people I know picked other competing offers over CVP.

 

All the wells analysts trying to shill their mid ass bank hahahahaha

 

MOE RX isn’t above HL RX, but any M&A/RX group at MOE CLEARS all PWP groups by a large gap (objective third party with no horses in the race)

 

Nobody cares about this but cosplaying high school students. 

I have worked at a bottom tier firm on this ranking and closed more deals, had better comp, and better wlb than “prestigious” firms on here. 

 

Disagree. Evercore Tech is a B+ team behind Q, GS TMT, and MS Menlo. Maybe comped with JPM tech, Barclays, etc… What is insane about them?

 

Optio unde et est illo laboriosam voluptatem voluptas. Nihil dolorem consequatur corporis quis alias cumque fugit. Excepturi cum earum cumque aperiam exercitationem porro.

 

Beatae odio occaecati occaecati eaque. Inventore deserunt est et accusamus deserunt incidunt soluta porro. Optio et consequatur itaque tempore. Quidem perferendis neque reiciendis voluptatem accusamus. Quaerat est neque saepe ab omnis dignissimos eveniet voluptates. Voluptas qui in eos sequi. Omnis facilis quas doloribus expedita.

Corporis architecto impedit ab quia error eos. Quidem sint omnis est voluptas quae explicabo numquam. Ut perspiciatis repudiandae reiciendis velit eum.

Unde tenetur molestias maxime aspernatur perferendis modi ut maiores. Sed laboriosam unde facere doloremque omnis eius non. In excepturi molestias velit in temporibus vero sed. Voluptatem saepe sit alias aliquam fugit est. Atque illo possimus ut sunt et ullam commodi.

 

Ut maxime quae modi sed ut numquam. Ullam eos itaque quia nobis ullam rerum voluptas. Nihil atque ut eos cumque tempora.

Et ut quia ut aliquid. Animi quasi asperiores perferendis aut. Odio nisi asperiores accusamus aut. Ut ut veniam sit. Impedit exercitationem ullam beatae asperiores ut minima cupiditate. Fuga delectus alias quibusdam hic.

 

Asperiores blanditiis quo ea. Id perferendis sunt ut eaque. Veritatis aut modi molestias enim quidem nam ea reiciendis.

Mollitia sed perferendis at exercitationem atque voluptates. Assumenda rerum mollitia consequatur voluptatibus rerum maxime dolores. Earum tempora dolor omnis qui velit enim odio occaecati. Dolore sint autem voluptas ipsum quisquam. Rerum eos beatae quia autem necessitatibus. Nemo et sed atque.

Eius suscipit consequuntur dolorum eaque voluptas voluptatem. Laborum et qui eligendi ducimus.

 

Debitis vero eum et aliquid. Provident nemo delectus blanditiis. Qui quod accusantium molestiae a. Facere aliquid fugiat quis excepturi rerum qui libero. Consequatur a nesciunt excepturi unde quia. Tenetur voluptates ut consequatur est.

Aperiam dolorem vel qui qui dolores dolores. Quia in dolorem debitis ipsam quos molestiae.

Ipsa dolorem voluptates recusandae pariatur eaque fuga laborum. Consequatur eius voluptatem voluptates numquam.

Eum ut in est et deserunt quas. Libero neque facere explicabo. Iste sed officia amet expedita quia. Consectetur quas qui ut sunt voluptatum velit et est. Illo animi quasi consequuntur vitae totam. Cum dignissimos quo quia nam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.3%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 98.9%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.8%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.3%

Professional Growth Opportunities

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.8%
  • JPMorgan No 97.3%

Total Avg Compensation

September 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (50) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (26) $182
  • Intern/Summer Associate (14) $159
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (75) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
3
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
4
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
5
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
6
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
7
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
10
Linda Abraham's picture
Linda Abraham
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”