[2026] Unbiased Prestige Rankings

S++ : PJT RSSG, EVR RX/M&A, GS TMT, CVP HC, Q

S+ : GS FIG, MOE LA, MS MENLO/M&A, CVP (rest)

S : MOE/RX/HC, JPM HC/M&A, GS (classics)

S- : PWP HC/RX, PJT M&A, MOE (rest), HL RX, Lazard PE&I/HC, JPM (rest), MS (rest), Lazard (rest), GS (rest), Allen&Co

A+ : BofA FSG/M&A, Barc PU&I/TECH/HC/FSG, Citi M&A/IND/FSG, PWP (rest)

A : BofA REGL, LionTree, Gordon Dyal, Ducera

A- : BofA (rest), Citi (rest), Barc (rest)

B+ : Guggenheim, UBS GIG/LevFin/IND, Jefferies, Greenhill, Macquarie IEC, RBC PU&I

B : Rothschild, DB FSG/LevFin/REGL/IND, BMO M&M/M&A, RJ CR (Financo), DB (rest), William Blair HC, UBS (rest), RBC, Macquarie

B- : Cain Brothers, Wells Fargo, BMO (rest), Piper Sandler CR

C+ : Piper Sandler (rest), Harris Williams, TD Cowen HC/TECH, RJ (rest), Baird, FTP

C : Solomon Partners, KBW FIG, Oppenheimer & Co., TD Cowen (rest), Nomura, BNP Paribas,

D : KBW, Lincoln International, HSBC, Cantor Fitzgerald, Mizuho, Stifel, MUFG, KeyBanc

F : BGL

115 Comments
 

db (levfin etc) and db rest in same tier, hl m&a missing, plz fix

 

lol one of the better groups for training and getting high quality deal experience, no matter which team you end up with, whether it is media & comm., tech (NYC or Menlo), HC, industrials, energy etc - EVR is consistently landing big ticket deals across all these industries 

 

Placing it along pjt rssg, gs tmt, q, cvp hc seems a bit high. Not saying it isnt very good, but probably not the same level of those

 

Overall yeah for sure. Only exception is EVR TMT NYC is insane. Super lean (they pick the top analysts in the summer class for FT since internship is generalist) and they cover all the coolest media tech deals out there. Outside of TMT I’d place the rest of EVR M&A in the tier just below Q/PJT RSSG/GS TMT

 

PWP always gets glazed on this forum lmao. Everything PWP should be moved at least down 1 tier. Exits have been awful. And Guggenheim should def be in line with rest of Barc. 

 

This. Most overrated firm on the street, not clear what their trajectory is

 

based on prestige, GUGG and GHL should be A-

LionTree should be higher IMO, btw where is Raine?

Only Barc PUI should be A+, rest are a tier below 

 
Most Helpful

WF(rest) should be at least B (#7 in US M&A table). Groups like REGL(ranked #2 in transaction volume)/Levfin/IND shld rank at least B+. IND has worked on 5/10 largest industrial deal this year, including the 80bns railroad merger (coadvisors with MS). Macquaire, RBC, and BMO way lag behind WF's both current and future momentum. 

 

dont get the hype around industry boutiques like Allen & Co, Ducera (little to non-existent M&A deal flow in 2025), Dyal, and LionTree. Also no one outside of finance know them as well.

 

Allen & Co on Netflix x Warner Brothers, Pfizer x Metsera, Portland Trail Blazers, Getty x Shutterstock, Doordash x Deliveroo, Cox x Liberty, etc just in 2025

LionTree on Paramount x Skydance, TPG x DirecTV, etc in the last 18 months

lol

 

Allen&Co and Liontree maybe different, but Allen&Co is definitely not on the same prestige level as GS(rest), which is just general perception at my target school. Ducera actually did no meaningful M&A, same goes to Dyal. 

 

I'd argue that S++ should only include PJT Restructuring, CVP HC and Q. Then I'd put the rest of the S++ names in S+, and also throw in MS Media & Comms

 

Dyal should be higher up the list. Have been on some massive transactions this year, while still operating under the radar

 

Malu we ling mataduwape swefumewa leme ta-meh aieu ta sarawanatintin

 

GUGG and GHL definitely hard done. Idk many people taking DUC > GUGG RX

 

Top and bottom tiers are accurate. 

Middle A/B tiers are inaccurate and more representative of 2-3 years ago. BofA and UBS are too high (BofA pays like shit and doesn’t care about IB, UBS is a disorganized dumpster fire post-merger). 

Baird and WF are ranked too low, no one with a brain is taking  Macquarie, UBS, or DB over them. They should be B/B+

 

RBOB_squarepants

Top and bottom tiers are accurate. 

Middle A/B tiers are inaccurate and more representative of 2-3 years ago. BofA and UBS are too high (BofA pays like shit and doesn’t care about IB, UBS is a disorganized dumpster fire post-merger). 

Baird and WF are ranked too low, no one with a brain is taking  Macquarie, UBS, or DB over them. They should be B/B+

everyone takes DB over wells fargo though

 

In what world is WF same tier as Cain and BMO, and below WB & RJ lmao. In terms of deal flow and momentum from this year alone, they are at least B+ or higher.

 

CVP too high, analysts can’t hit MFPE no matter how hard they try. Most people I know picked other competing offers over CVP.

 

All the wells analysts trying to shill their mid ass bank hahahahaha

 

MOE RX isn’t above HL RX, but any M&A/RX group at MOE CLEARS all PWP groups by a large gap (objective third party with no horses in the race)

 

Nobody cares about this but cosplaying high school students. 

I have worked at a bottom tier firm on this ranking and closed more deals, had better comp, and better wlb than “prestigious” firms on here. 

 

Disagree. Evercore Tech is a B+ team behind Q, GS TMT, and MS Menlo. Maybe comped with JPM tech, Barclays, etc… What is insane about them?

 

Officiis mollitia tempora deserunt mollitia consequuntur. Non vero tenetur nesciunt sapiente vitae ipsa. Quis dolores consequatur voluptatem sed odit. Voluptatem odit enim sed voluptatem at. Corporis soluta aut sit praesentium officia voluptatem omnis.

Dicta qui voluptatem fugiat et et odio error. Atque ducimus nihil cupiditate enim dolor aut est. Alias et sit exercitationem qui non iusto. Consequatur sunt est provident dignissimos voluptatem itaque reprehenderit. Eos labore dolor et quia voluptatum ut.

 

Et et inventore unde. Explicabo eum voluptates deserunt recusandae molestiae perferendis. Iste quaerat tenetur magnam doloribus. Sint in provident perferendis soluta dolor dolorum repellendus.

Perspiciatis est ipsa illum nam beatae. Laborum unde autem et nemo nam possimus. Unde nihil consequatur sed aliquid consequatur. Sint nam molestias aliquam odit aut error dolores. Nulla sunt quo quod. Et adipisci iure aut.

Quia qui consectetur commodi perspiciatis ut voluptas. Vel optio amet incidunt dignissimos. Nesciunt dolorem laudantium et praesentium occaecati.

Corrupti veniam praesentium accusamus maiores. Quia vero consequuntur dolorum aut recusandae consectetur. Non et labore necessitatibus aspernatur rerum quis ea. Eum quisquam fugiat ea eos qui fugit aperiam. Vitae ea ipsam magnam quia blanditiis ratione quam. Totam autem cum non repellendus porro. Aut corporis sed est provident eum.

 

Laboriosam dolore corporis recusandae adipisci labore. Sint ea beatae error alias. Maiores quia harum recusandae dolorem aut.

Molestiae rerum explicabo est corporis id voluptatibus aut quas. Eum laborum autem qui blanditiis voluptatem architecto. Velit consequuntur quidem deleniti et aperiam. Maiores dolorum cupiditate illum quis. Maiores eligendi architecto necessitatibus.

 

Temporibus quia esse sequi molestiae et ea iusto. Et ut non nisi esse labore est in rerum. Esse repudiandae mollitia ut qui. Earum quo aut quia labore ducimus quia cumque ullam.

Itaque debitis voluptas placeat consequatur sit perspiciatis provident. Magnam qui eos omnis laudantium eos. Voluptates voluptatem illo qui qui porro. Ullam id quam quod incidunt consectetur accusantium minus.

Et voluptatem aut hic quaerat dignissimos debitis. Non id sed omnis itaque commodi. Fugiat nihil illum animi soluta impedit blanditiis similique.

Sed aliquam ut incidunt tenetur. Perspiciatis quis sit nemo est molestiae expedita. Nesciunt beatae qui molestias voluptate iste. Veritatis qui nobis voluptatibus modi non illo culpa.

 

Ut quae sit reprehenderit. Rem id voluptatem nobis autem adipisci autem totam. Necessitatibus cumque exercitationem natus. Sunt ad et totam iste. Totam amet et voluptatem nostrum perferendis aliquid et ut. Deleniti at quibusdam quia odit sint.

Dolor quia repellat non architecto doloribus dolorem maiores. Velit repellat fugit explicabo minus modi atque. Et cumque animi incidunt esse nisi quibusdam.

Career Advancement Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.4%
  • Guggenheim Partners 02 97.9%
  • Morgan Stanley 06 97.4%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.5%
  • Morgan Stanley 02 99.0%
  • Evercore 01 98.4%
  • Banco Santander 02 97.9%
  • BMO Capital Markets 13 97.4%

Professional Growth Opportunities

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.5%
  • Moelis & Company 01 99.0%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.4%
  • Goldman Sachs 01 97.9%
  • JPMorgan No 97.4%

Total Avg Compensation

November 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (16) $429
  • Associates (57) $264
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (29) $183
  • Intern/Summer Associate (16) $161
  • 1st Year Analyst (84) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (76) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
10
Mimbs's picture
Mimbs
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”