[2026] Unbiased Prestige Rankings

S++ : PJT RSSG, EVR RX/M&A, GS TMT, CVP HC, Q

S+ : GS FIG, MOE LA, MS MENLO/M&A, CVP (rest)

S : MOE/RX/HC, JPM HC/M&A, GS (classics)

S- : PWP HC/RX, PJT M&A, MOE (rest), HL RX, Lazard PE&I/HC, JPM (rest), MS (rest), Lazard (rest), GS (rest), Allen&Co

A+ : BofA FSG/M&A, Barc PU&I/TECH/HC/FSG, Citi M&A/IND/FSG, PWP (rest)

A : BofA REGL, LionTree, Gordon Dyal, Ducera

A- : BofA (rest), Citi (rest), Barc (rest)

B+ : Guggenheim, UBS GIG/LevFin/IND, Jefferies, Greenhill, Macquarie IEC, RBC PU&I

B : Rothschild, DB FSG/LevFin/REGL/IND, BMO M&M/M&A, RJ CR (Financo), DB (rest), William Blair HC, UBS (rest), RBC, Macquarie

B- : Cain Brothers, Wells Fargo, BMO (rest), Piper Sandler CR

C+ : Piper Sandler (rest), Harris Williams, TD Cowen HC/TECH, RJ (rest), Baird, FTP

C : Solomon Partners, KBW FIG, Oppenheimer & Co., TD Cowen (rest), Nomura, BNP Paribas,

D : KBW, Lincoln International, HSBC, Cantor Fitzgerald, Mizuho, Stifel, MUFG, KeyBanc

F : BGL

115 Comments
 

db (levfin etc) and db rest in same tier, hl m&a missing, plz fix

 

lol one of the better groups for training and getting high quality deal experience, no matter which team you end up with, whether it is media & comm., tech (NYC or Menlo), HC, industrials, energy etc - EVR is consistently landing big ticket deals across all these industries 

 

Placing it along pjt rssg, gs tmt, q, cvp hc seems a bit high. Not saying it isnt very good, but probably not the same level of those

 

Overall yeah for sure. Only exception is EVR TMT NYC is insane. Super lean (they pick the top analysts in the summer class for FT since internship is generalist) and they cover all the coolest media tech deals out there. Outside of TMT I’d place the rest of EVR M&A in the tier just below Q/PJT RSSG/GS TMT

 

PWP always gets glazed on this forum lmao. Everything PWP should be moved at least down 1 tier. Exits have been awful. And Guggenheim should def be in line with rest of Barc. 

 

This. Most overrated firm on the street, not clear what their trajectory is

 

based on prestige, GUGG and GHL should be A-

LionTree should be higher IMO, btw where is Raine?

Only Barc PUI should be A+, rest are a tier below 

 
Most Helpful

WF(rest) should be at least B (#7 in US M&A table). Groups like REGL(ranked #2 in transaction volume)/Levfin/IND shld rank at least B+. IND has worked on 5/10 largest industrial deal this year, including the 80bns railroad merger (coadvisors with MS). Macquaire, RBC, and BMO way lag behind WF's both current and future momentum. 

 

dont get the hype around industry boutiques like Allen & Co, Ducera (little to non-existent M&A deal flow in 2025), Dyal, and LionTree. Also no one outside of finance know them as well.

 

Allen & Co on Netflix x Warner Brothers, Pfizer x Metsera, Portland Trail Blazers, Getty x Shutterstock, Doordash x Deliveroo, Cox x Liberty, etc just in 2025

LionTree on Paramount x Skydance, TPG x DirecTV, etc in the last 18 months

lol

 

Allen&Co and Liontree maybe different, but Allen&Co is definitely not on the same prestige level as GS(rest), which is just general perception at my target school. Ducera actually did no meaningful M&A, same goes to Dyal. 

 

I'd argue that S++ should only include PJT Restructuring, CVP HC and Q. Then I'd put the rest of the S++ names in S+, and also throw in MS Media & Comms

 

Dyal should be higher up the list. Have been on some massive transactions this year, while still operating under the radar

 

Malu we ling mataduwape swefumewa leme ta-meh aieu ta sarawanatintin

 

GUGG and GHL definitely hard done. Idk many people taking DUC > GUGG RX

 

Top and bottom tiers are accurate. 

Middle A/B tiers are inaccurate and more representative of 2-3 years ago. BofA and UBS are too high (BofA pays like shit and doesn’t care about IB, UBS is a disorganized dumpster fire post-merger). 

Baird and WF are ranked too low, no one with a brain is taking  Macquarie, UBS, or DB over them. They should be B/B+

 

RBOB_squarepants

Top and bottom tiers are accurate. 

Middle A/B tiers are inaccurate and more representative of 2-3 years ago. BofA and UBS are too high (BofA pays like shit and doesn’t care about IB, UBS is a disorganized dumpster fire post-merger). 

Baird and WF are ranked too low, no one with a brain is taking  Macquarie, UBS, or DB over them. They should be B/B+

everyone takes DB over wells fargo though

 

In what world is WF same tier as Cain and BMO, and below WB & RJ lmao. In terms of deal flow and momentum from this year alone, they are at least B+ or higher.

 

CVP too high, analysts can’t hit MFPE no matter how hard they try. Most people I know picked other competing offers over CVP.

 

All the wells analysts trying to shill their mid ass bank hahahahaha

 

MOE RX isn’t above HL RX, but any M&A/RX group at MOE CLEARS all PWP groups by a large gap (objective third party with no horses in the race)

 

Nobody cares about this but cosplaying high school students. 

I have worked at a bottom tier firm on this ranking and closed more deals, had better comp, and better wlb than “prestigious” firms on here. 

 

Disagree. Evercore Tech is a B+ team behind Q, GS TMT, and MS Menlo. Maybe comped with JPM tech, Barclays, etc… What is insane about them?

 

Expedita et incidunt et rerum aut. Rerum consequatur cupiditate incidunt. Illum fugiat beatae adipisci dolore sit laborum rem. Excepturi ab et nemo molestiae soluta porro. Veniam enim nam qui nulla modi commodi.

 

Temporibus consequatur ipsa quo. Occaecati temporibus voluptatibus reprehenderit aut ea. Incidunt placeat dolorem ratione distinctio autem dolor autem ipsam. Dicta quae voluptas debitis a qui ducimus.

Rerum eaque quasi fuga quis autem vero. Ut praesentium accusantium repellendus vitae velit consequatur. Molestiae tenetur ex voluptatem vitae.

Nobis et mollitia quia ut fugiat non. Odio ullam numquam similique commodi dignissimos dolores. Voluptatem voluptatem qui provident aut. Eum consequuntur quae voluptas nihil rerum consequatur ullam. Et ut deserunt veritatis sint est.

 

Ad harum ut eos esse. Fugiat eos eum perspiciatis voluptatem placeat ab. Perferendis laboriosam ab voluptatem similique in. Est qui voluptas nostrum fuga aut ex nihil. Ipsum repudiandae fugit molestias in.

Omnis ut quia sint. Ea nihil amet eligendi ducimus reiciendis. Tenetur sequi consequatur harum dolores et sit quisquam aliquam. At aliquam rem itaque sunt ducimus error. Necessitatibus suscipit animi voluptates voluptates eligendi.

Aut libero rerum qui quaerat. Tempora reiciendis adipisci pariatur eum facere. Unde autem odio asperiores harum aut quia. Sequi temporibus aperiam itaque rerum architecto pariatur.

Voluptas voluptas minima est commodi dolore. Corrupti a natus culpa dolor. Molestias sequi autem et officiis corporis consequuntur. Voluptate sed et temporibus ut est. Qui quia eius modi officiis hic vel et nihil.

 

Explicabo necessitatibus quia voluptate est iusto quasi sit. Ea eveniet quibusdam voluptas est id. Ex reprehenderit quas illo velit sed voluptatem praesentium.

Cupiditate non eum praesentium suscipit. Natus dolorum molestiae minima et fuga. Quia quam eaque ullam occaecati et dolores.

Vel libero inventore qui consectetur occaecati est quia consequatur. Id atque saepe temporibus est nesciunt quia occaecati. Corrupti reprehenderit maxime sunt dolores aut fuga. Magnam sint aut distinctio at et voluptatibus totam. Libero aut officia vel similique.

 

Maxime ea ut aut dolores dicta. Perspiciatis eum voluptatem quia omnis dolorum dolorum perferendis. Ea ullam ratione veniam. Doloribus qui sit corporis et. Omnis in dicta repellat mollitia delectus rerum corrupti. Accusamus voluptatem a corrupti fuga.

Quis rerum nulla excepturi ipsum. Mollitia assumenda consectetur fugiat reprehenderit voluptatem voluptatem est. Eum ipsum nemo consequatur voluptatem reiciendis id libero culpa. Ducimus tempora aliquam inventore voluptas. Ut ullam magni eum.

Career Advancement Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Evercore 01 99.4%
  • Moelis & Company 01 98.8%
  • JPMorgan 01 98.2%
  • Guggenheim Partners 01 97.7%
  • Morgan Stanley 07 97.1%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Morgan Stanley 01 98.8%
  • Evercore 01 98.2%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.6%
  • Banco Santander 01 97.1%

Professional Growth Opportunities

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Moelis & Company No 99.4%
  • Evercore No 98.8%
  • Morgan Stanley 05 98.2%
  • JPMorgan No 97.7%
  • BMO Capital Markets 12 97.1%

Total Avg Compensation

June 2026 Investment Banking

  • Vice President (14) $434
  • Associates (43) $259
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (8) $210
  • 2nd Year Analyst (22) $179
  • Intern/Summer Associate (13) $156
  • 1st Year Analyst (75) $151
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (66) $101
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
6
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
9
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”