UNDISPUTED RANKINGS - 2021

BB Rankings:

  1. Goldman Sachs / Morgan Stanley / JPM

  2. BofA / Citi / Barclays

  3. Credit Suisse / RBC

  4. Wells Fargo / DB / UBS

EB Rankings:

  1. PJT / Evercore / Centerview / Qatalyst

  2. PWP / Lazard / Moelis

  3. Guggenhiem / Houlihan (Note: both RX teams would be tier one)

  4. Rothschild / Greenhill

MM Rankings:

Jefferies / Raine / Cowen / Baird / William Blair

Meh, weak groups:

Stifle / Nomura

WSO Elite Modeling Package

  • 6 courses to mastery: Excel, Financial Statement, LBO, M&A, Valuation and DCF
  • Elite instructors from top BB investment banks and private equity megafunds
  • Includes Company DB + Video Library Access (1 year)

Comments (115)

Controversial
  • Analyst 1 in IB - Gen
May 17, 2021 - 2:17pm

Looks like someone is interning at RBC / WF

edit: MS from butthurt MM kids thinking they're on par with CS / BarCap lol

Learn More

300+ video lessons across 6 modeling courses taught by elite practitioners at the top investment banks and private equity funds -- Excel Modeling -- Financial Statement Modeling -- M&A Modeling -- LBO Modeling -- DCF and Valuation Modeling -- ALL INCLUDED + 2 Huge Bonuses.

Learn more
  • Associate 1 in S&T - Other
May 17, 2021 - 2:46pm

while everyone shits on WF being equal to CS, no one is going to say something about RBC==Barcap??

  • Analyst 1 in AM - Equities
May 17, 2021 - 3:11pm

Qatalyst should be right at the top of EB's, and Raine should be somewhere in honorable mention. 

Most Helpful
  • Intern in IB - Cov
May 17, 2021 - 3:19pm

Look at 2021 YTD League Table, pledge. Take out WF and RBC from the BB table, include Jefferies there, and then put DB as 5 and UBS as 6.

  • Associate 1 in S&T - Other
May 17, 2021 - 3:23pm

OP then should just link this website instead of his own honest opinion, tbh Jefferies will never be a BB. Also, this is just 2021 Q1 earnings.

  • Analyst 1 in IB-M&A
May 17, 2021 - 3:29pm

OP then should just link this website instead of his own honest opinion, tbh Jefferies will never be a BB. Also, this is just 2021 Q1 earnings.

It isn't just Q1 earnings lol. Jefferies has been outperforming since the past couple of years. It pays slightly above street at analyst level but that scales up considerably as you rise through the ranks and the top performers are paid at the EB level. This isn't to say that it is at the Goldman level but I think it's fair to say given it's historic and future trajectory that it is at UBS/DB level (maybe even slightly ahead in IB) and above the other balance sheet and MM banks. 

May 17, 2021 - 11:49pm

Lets Assume that you are looking at this table: https://www.factset.com/hubfs/mergerstat_em/monthly/US-Flashwire-Monthl…

I would still put Jefferies Wells and RBC all in the same category as they are above a 1 billion deal value per deal.  I know that some people are going to say that well RBC and Wells are much lower on the transaction volume but, if we are not LQA the Q1 leagues tables and generally looking at 2018, 2019, and 2020 league tables (Excluding RBC 2020 as it looks like it was a really bad year for them)   generally they are much closer (RBC closer than Wells) to overall volume of the biggest players.  

  • Analyst 2 in IB-M&A
May 17, 2021 - 4:01pm

I'm not sure why this thread has so much MS... The rankings are very accurate

  • Analyst 1 in IB - Cov
May 17, 2021 - 4:20pm

BofA and Citi are not a tier better than Barclays. Those banks may be ahead on league tables, but Barclays is more prestigious if anything. JPM arguably has the best name outside of GS, ridiculous to put BofA and Citi on the same tier.

  • Associate 1 in S&T - Other
May 17, 2021 - 4:22pm

Citi has always been ranks ahead of barcap especially pre 2008 era, barcap has prestige over Citi? don't think so

  • Analyst 1 in IB - Cov
May 17, 2021 - 9:10pm

Barclays is EX-Lehman, which was a better brand than Citi. League tables are not very accurate. Citi is a huge balance sheet bank, and often receive M&A credit when on the deal only for financing, not for M&A work. This is the case for every BB, but much more so with Citi/BofA than others. Also Citi is arguably the most global bank (which obviously is a great thing and has its pros), but once again misleading in terms of league tables because they have a much larger percentage of deals outside the US (many in very remote areas). Even just in the way they hire at the junior level, it is clear that Barclays is viewed as more prestigious. Barclays hires more candidates from top schools, and they do so while recruiting on the later side of things. Citi takes a bunch of non-core candidates, possibly the biggest diversity bank, and they recruit 6+ months ahead of the top 5 BB's (GS, MS, JPM, BAML, BARC) in order to try to pressure candidates that wouldn't normally go with Citi. Bigger does not always mean better, and Barclays is clearly viewed as better by more candidates. Not to mention better culture and in-house M&A. 

  • Intern in IB - Cov
May 17, 2021 - 4:34pm

Move JPM up with GS/MS or at least by itself. Barclays on par with the likes of BofA and especially Citi. RBC doesn't belong with CS, move down with DB/Wells/UBS. Boutiques look good.

  • Incoming Analyst in IB-M&A
May 18, 2021 - 3:02am

agree - Outside of the M&A group Citi should be in tier 3, Barc/Baml the only real banks that belong in tier 2 and even then Baml not strong outside product groups (M&A/Sponsors/Levfin) and MAYBE Consumer

  • Analyst 1 in IB - Cov
May 17, 2021 - 5:03pm

Large Banks

GS/MS/JPM

BAML/BARC/CITI

CS/UBS

JEFF

DB/RBC/WF

Large Boutiques

EVR/PJT/CENT

LAZ/MOEL

PWP/GUGG

Honorable Mention: Greenhill, Houlihan

Top Industry boutiques include: Qatalyst, Eastdil Secured, Liontree, Raine, etc.

  • Summer Associate in IB-M&A
May 18, 2021 - 3:02am

PWP above Gugg lol - on par with MOE + LAZ given deal flow/head

May 18, 2021 - 3:02am

Laudantium sequi molestiae nostrum nihil expedita. Exercitationem et a et et dignissimos laboriosam. Nam quia voluptatem doloremque minus porro tenetur ducimus. Autem repellat voluptas non error dicta voluptatem. Est blanditiis nihil in qui rerum incidunt et. Consequuntur qui quia facilis esse eos.

Vel qui architecto veniam qui. Dicta commodi vel est nulla earum laboriosam deleniti. Vel et exercitationem in recusandae. Recusandae incidunt voluptatem non magni quis dolorem. Quas ut aut rem non dolor.

May 18, 2021 - 3:02am

Corporis aliquid rerum adipisci assumenda soluta nihil sunt maxime. Est perspiciatis accusamus non est earum explicabo rerum. Adipisci tempora totam autem. Architecto aut velit dolores suscipit expedita debitis aut.

Sunt ut suscipit laudantium cumque. Esse pariatur officiis aut. Quisquam numquam eos fugiat et quia suscipit saepe. Repellendus temporibus molestiae adipisci. Culpa voluptatem similique iste ad facilis quis est voluptatem. Est assumenda amet possimus consequatur.

Dicta ab earum ducimus. Quasi dolorum accusantium mollitia. Tenetur est tenetur harum provident sit.

Consectetur a corrupti quia a quas enim ea. Voluptas autem fugit quas voluptatem voluptas. Repellat cum fuga qui mollitia mollitia enim dicta.

May 18, 2021 - 3:02am

Beatae consectetur officia sint provident voluptatem et est. Iure consequatur sit sit. Voluptatem molestias sit porro consequatur reiciendis hic blanditiis quaerat. Aut nesciunt id et rerum quam adipisci ut iusto. Ea libero velit eos dolor dolore dolorem. Deleniti qui totam officia voluptatem laudantium qui natus aliquid. Ipsum explicabo non dicta et.

Eos libero harum aut ut eligendi repellendus necessitatibus. Dolor repudiandae nam reiciendis reprehenderit.

Perspiciatis numquam consequatur distinctio autem sunt voluptates sunt adipisci. Quia et aliquam qui est consequatur ducimus vel.

Nobis consequatur aut maiores qui harum nam. Iste et omnis blanditiis. Est quis suscipit ea esse voluptatibus corporis et.

May 18, 2021 - 3:02am

Rerum vero vitae expedita maxime necessitatibus inventore. Repellendus expedita voluptatibus rerum ea doloremque delectus. Quis distinctio rem eos rerum sit voluptas est exercitationem. Nesciunt aspernatur consequuntur fuga molestiae ut harum dignissimos. Aspernatur illum maiores cum ea ipsum. Sit quod accusantium quisquam.

Sapiente commodi facilis consequuntur omnis sint. Et cumque dolor eos voluptatibus. Ratione debitis cumque et in. Consectetur sed distinctio quidem ullam officia nihil consequatur.

Aut temporibus animi consectetur aut sunt. Quaerat dolorem ex nemo est neque. Aut quasi quae labore rerum nihil provident.

Est quia similique pariatur eligendi adipisci omnis ducimus. Ea est eveniet ab. Quidem consequuntur quis ab quis ab rerum. Numquam officia ut minus quia laudantium officia.

  • Incoming Analyst in IB-M&A
May 18, 2021 - 3:02am

Commodi quia necessitatibus modi sint cum dolorem quis. Corporis cumque odio ducimus impedit. Dolore qui culpa quasi natus repudiandae. Consequatur libero esse culpa fugit quos. Ex reprehenderit et ex reprehenderit et.

Aut possimus officiis est veniam. Suscipit nulla consequatur sint libero. Autem et totam fugit voluptatibus itaque rerum et.

Voluptas sit eos repudiandae nesciunt quo fugit cupiditate sit. Nam officia rerum accusantium officiis adipisci. Non impedit ex tempore et possimus vel ut. Numquam nihil et dolorem voluptatem.

Voluptas dignissimos nulla sed optio. Voluptatem voluptas error officia ipsa. Nobis fugit deleniti eum enim tempore quos. Eveniet voluptas expedita corporis molestias aliquid ab eius. Quae odio ea animi distinctio est voluptas. Optio totam odit et et saepe occaecati. Delectus deleniti reprehenderit tempore.

Start Discussion

Total Avg Compensation

October 2021 Investment Banking

  • Director/MD (10) $853
  • Vice President (39) $363
  • Associates (229) $233
  • 2nd Year Analyst (139) $155
  • 3rd+ Year Analyst (32) $149
  • Intern/Summer Associate (105) $142
  • 1st Year Analyst (504) $135
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (388) $83