2022 Bonus / Comp Thread

Guess it's almost that time of year where #'s are getting communicated. Share below (if possible in below format). I'll get it started:

YoE (since Grad / on Buyside): 8 / 6

Strategy: Credit/Event

Total 2022 Comp (Base + Bonus): 750k (150 / 600)

Total 2021 Comp: 1.1M

Notes: fund exp to be down 5-10% this year

219 Comments
 
Research Associate in HF - Event

Guess it's almost that time of year where #'s are getting communicated. Share below (if possible in below format). I'll get it started:

YoE (since Grad / on Buyside): 8 / 6

Strategy: Credit/Event

Total 2022 Comp (Base + Bonus): 750k (150 / 600)

Total 2021 Comp: 1.1M

Notes: fund exp to be down 5-10% this year

YOE buyside: 13

strategy: multi asset/quant

2022 comp: $5.5mm ($500k base / $5mm bonus)

 
biotechbuddy555

Unrelated Q but have you found your hrs over the past 10yrs have stayed pretty constant around 50-65/week? Curious if more tenured buysiders (6+ yrs) see hours change over a long enough time horizon. Thx

I usually work ~50 hrs a week (8AM - 6 PM) although I do spend a lot of my time outside of work thinking about markets. Rarely does it get over 60 unless a lot is going on in the markets. 

 

What does an undergraduate junior math major with a summer IB position at a Jefferies/WB/Guggenheim caliber firm hoping to be in your position some time down the line have to do. Any valuable hard skills to learn early (maybe accounting?).

Honestly, I’d recommend you enjoy college and make sure you use that time to study the things you are passionate about (and take the weird classes/seminars that sound interesting that you may not get a chance to do later in life). And also enjoy the social aspect, you are surrounded by people your age, there are so many great opportunities to take advantage of in college, don’t waste that time worrying about what’ll get you in a HF down the road, most of that stuff won’t matter (you’ll learn a lot on the job).

I never set out to work at a HF out of school (barely knew how they worked), so I can’t say my advice is any good. But I’ve had most of my success when finding the things I’m passionate about and working hard at them. A few things:

1) follow your passions: when I set out the quant space wasn’t that big, the technical skills weren’t valued as much, but I enjoyed it. I focused on being the best at that 

2) focus on learning: too often people are focused on being the best or being “right” without focusing on actually learning content. A big difference between a HF and school is that there isn’t a “right” answer, you need to be creative and see things others don’t 

3) don’t be afraid to fail: so many people I’ve met come from impressive backgrounds, have always been the “best”, they don’t know how to fail and learn and they are so afraid of it 

4) take all the opportunities presented to you (to a degree): don’t stress about things being “beneath” you, work hard and every opportunity is an opportunity to learn and advance. 
 

that’s all I have for now 

 

Hey OP, couple questions

  1. How big and lean is your fund? Relatively speaking
  1. Assuming your sr analyst? Is there real visibility to PM / partner, and if so, how does comp structure change in that seat? When do u think you’ll get there?
 

Hey OP, couple questions

  1. How big and lean is your fund? Relatively speaking
  1. Assuming your sr analyst? Is there real visibility to PM / partner, and if so, how does comp structure change in that seat? When do u think you'll get there?

Don't want to get too specific but reasonably lean. I'm a mid to senior level analyst, don't think there's path to partner but I would guess the much more senior analysts make 3-5x+ what I make

 

Ignore the title from a prior role.

YoE: 8 / 7

Strategy: Credit/Event SM HF

2022 Comp: 1.1M total (300 base / 800 bonus)

Performance: down 0-5%

AUM: $10BN+

- expand -

How are you getting that bonus even with 0-5% year? Is comp not just linked to fund performance?

Not OP but next year distressed / credit is expected to be attractive so need senior analysts in seats to drive incremental returns. 
 

At 10bn+ should be well within the 300m+ / IP range or better so the management fees are there and 0-5% should beat relevant credit benchmarks.

Im more impressed by the base salary.

 

Ignore the title from a prior role.

YoE: 8 / 7

Strategy: Credit/Event SM HF

2022 Comp: 1.1M total (300 base / 800 bonus)

Performance: down 0-5%

AUM: $10BN+

Congrats - sounds like we are in similar enough age / industry / seats (I'm OP). How was your 2022 vs. 2021? I kind of expected comp to be down, haven't really figured out if I should be underwhelmed, happy, sad or what with what they gave me (I guess should default to grateful to have a job and pay great vs. many many others)

 

that's what I'm thinking. the market has been atrocious this year. funds are going bust. layoffs everywhere. and people in here are all like "fund down 5%, comp mil+". one guy even posted that he made 5.5mil. that's what Olivier Giroud is making - one of the top goal scorers in the World Cup, leading goal scorer in French history, the man who brought France to the World Cup final. and then somebody who lost 5% of somebody else's money is getting paid the same. ridiculous.

 

Kevin25

that's what I'm thinking. the market has been atrocious this year. funds are going bust. layoffs everywhere. and people in here are all like "fund down 5%, comp mil+". one guy even posted that he made 5.5mil. that's what Olivier Giroud is making - one of the top goal scorers in the World Cup, leading goal scorer in French history, the man who brought France to the World Cup final. and then somebody who lost 5% of somebody else's money is getting paid the same. ridiculous.

I’m the person who posted the $5.5mm and we didn’t lose 5%. We are up a fair bit this year. Also, many football players get paid a lot more (you are cherry picking an example) but on the other side there aren’t many people at funds that make this either (so you are comparing a good players to a senior person at a “top” fund). It isn’t crazy, both are people who are excelling in a competitive field. 

 

YOE: 5-7 / 5-7

Strategy: L/S Equity

2022 Comp: $100k + $0k

Notes: fund expected to be down around mid-teens for the year. Made a lot of investment errors this year, will bounce back next year hopefully. Based in US.

 

For you london lads:

YoE (since Grad / on Buyside): 2 / 1

Strategy: Quant Alternative

Total 2022 Comp (Base + Bonus): ~£290k (~95 + ~195)

Notes: dogshit first half of the year, crazy good second half.

 

YoE (since Grad / on Buyside): 5 / 3

Strategy: L/S Equity (Crossover)

Total 2022 Comp (Base + Bonus): 380k (160 / 220)

$1-5bn fund size, down ~25% this year

Why are they paying you a fat bonus even with being down 25% on the year? Genuinely curious 

 

I’m not sure what you’re specifically referring to here but for context staying in PE for a third year comp would be ~$450-500k (hence $400k is under market). If we were legitimately up 40% this year I would hope to be above $600k but also recognize there is likely some ceiling to what I’d get in my first year on the HF side. Have heard of first year guarantees from top crossovers for 2+2 backgrounds in the $600-700k range (this was in 2021 though) 

 

What value did you contribute to your crossover fund -25% that makes you entitled to more than 400k of comp / "it is not good comp"? You sound tone deaf if how you're describing "but my PE comp would've been this if I stayed" where your clear value is a cog in the machine of churning out models for your MD vs. having questionable value to tech-beta HF that itself probably has questionable value if they were down 25% this year.

Compensation doesn't just move in a straight line upwards because you got college / banking / PE with a golden spoon after you first opened a Vault guide 10 years ago. You should be grateful your fund hasn't been liquidated frankly.

 

Got it, I’m sorry you’re upset about the people who have been able to ride the levered long tech beta wave to wealth over the past few years - sounds like you weren’t on that path and I can understand the frustration. With that said, my comp does not include any sort of tie-in to incentive performance so in many ways (this is my opinion you don’t need to agree) I am still a “cog in the machine” where my comp / cost is based on the other respective opportunities in the market. FWIW I joined part way through the year and the fund was already down - the P&L for the names I cover / pitched was actually positive. 

 

Got it, I'm sorry you're upset about the people who have been able to ride the levered long tech beta wave to wealth over the past few years - sounds like you weren't on that path and I can understand the frustration. With that said, my comp does not include any sort of tie-in to incentive performance so in many ways (this is my opinion you don't need to agree) I am still a "cog in the machine" where my comp / cost is based on the other respective opportunities in the market. FWIW I joined part way through the year and the fund was already down - the P&L for the names I cover / pitched was actually positive. 

So they paid you 220k bonus for not a full year? And you're running victory laps for pitching some ideas mid way through the year after names drawdown 50-70% and we've gone through 3+ bear market rallies?

I could care less how others make their wealth (especially in industry like ours where the average HF professional value add is "negative" returns) but when I see young kids with shiny eyes having attitude / entitlement problems, I try point it out only so that it may help you down the road. I guarantee you that your "P&L for my names are positive" matter equally at best (and less than at worst) to your attitude early in your career and senior analysts / PMs notice that stuff. 

 

I’m not OP and I love this drama but it really gets me when people say “what did you to deserve $x”. What do you do to deserve your $200k base comp versus some guy in any other job. Who the fuck cares. 
 

Everyone knows it’s not necessarily a straight line up progression in the HF world but in the more SM funds at a junior level - it’s kind of like that. You’re not as levered as you are to fund performance (so you don’t make crazy amounts in a blowout year either) and they build in some some of career progression path.
 

Literally nothing wrong with comparing his forward PE comp with HF comp. That’s literally the choice one has to make when leaving PE too.

Fund is down and he’s still getting 400k or whatever? Who cares - good for him. Maybe it’s a good seat and the fund values retaining people + can afford despite being down.

 

If these guys are being paid so well when the fund is losing money I wonder how macro guys are doing right now...

 

YoE (since Grad / on Buyside): 5 / 5

Strategy: Event

Total 2022 Comp (Base + Bonus): 635

Total 2021 Comp: 620

0% PnL; my positions meh

 

could you give any insight on how many hours you work in a week? i'm trying to get an idea of the pod lifestyle

 

Depends on the team really. The stressful part about the job isn’t really the hours. You’ll end up thinking about the stocks, ideas and themes way beyond the hours you spend at the desk.. 

For my specific case, my actual hours at the desk look something like 7:30am to 5:30pm. Extend that a little bit during earnings. Some teams spend all their time building very detailed models which can mean they spend more time at the desk. Again, hours worked not really the main driver of wellbeing on the job I’d say. 

Team performed in line with overall fund so pretty normal year. 

 

Can you share what your career path was? Also, excuse me for still learning but "pod"? 

 

Probably not - you need a formulaic payout.

In this case it means making about 150mm of pnl at a multi-manager which can be done in a big year with 1-2bn of capital.

 

what percentile of PMs would you say you are in at your MM? top 20%? top 10%? This might be the biggest comp number posted in any WSO bonus thread 

 

I think that at a top MM, maybe 5-10% of teams will make about 20mm in a year.

 

Wow what were returns in 2021 vs 2022? Also do you work at a macro-specialized MM or one of the bigger MMs (citadel/baly/MLP)?

 

YOE: 0.5/0.5

Strategy: LO

Comp (Annualized): 160k (115k base + 45k bonus)

Honestly very surprised, beat my expectations.

 

YoE (since Grad / on Buyside): since finishing graduate school: 4.5 / 2.5

Strategy: Equity L/S SM, sector specific, $600M AUM

Total 2022 Comp (Base + Bonus): 925k (250 / 675 (425 cash, 250 deferred)

Total 2021 Comp: 650k

Notes: fund up around 5%

 

What does equity mean here? Do you mean a percent of the incentive fee? Or actual equity on the management  company  whereby you share in both management  and performance  fee streams?

 

Don't compare to London/NYC comp if you're somewhere else in Europe. Cost of living must be inferior for you ;)

 

YoE (since Grad / on Buyside): 3 / 1

Total 2022 Comp (Base + Bonus): $350k ($150 base / $200 bonus)

Notes: 2 years of BB IB. $3bn L/S SM fund

 

Architecto debitis vel unde incidunt. Omnis qui et autem aperiam quidem et id. Nulla exercitationem qui et omnis alias.

Vel incidunt debitis qui. Maiores a ducimus est esse sit enim. Reprehenderit unde saepe tenetur.

Quas doloremque et et non. Ab fuga alias voluptas molestiae explicabo quaerat perspiciatis. Laborum debitis suscipit libero asperiores ut. Quisquam ratione sed laborum voluptate. Culpa magni veritatis non omnis. Ut a pariatur est temporibus sit. Quod quidem accusamus similique nihil dignissimos doloribus.

 

Accusantium rerum velit cum libero quia. Incidunt voluptas fugiat et alias fugit quae est. Ut sed reiciendis aut odio eaque tempora vel.

Tempore ea impedit quia expedita maiores in. Commodi aut odit et et voluptas enim omnis recusandae. Reprehenderit modi qui libero dicta est quae. Eos sit in harum atque reprehenderit totam.

 

Hic qui molestiae fuga consequatur autem provident iste nihil. Dolores delectus ex quia veritatis doloremque voluptas et. Autem officia atque est dicta at. Est in cumque qui laudantium. Delectus et rerum fugit inventore beatae et perferendis. Occaecati nihil incidunt corporis eos et. Qui possimus neque nulla quo.

 

Eos odio occaecati et quis est autem. Numquam eos vitae laudantium illo.

Rem ducimus et consequatur. Dolores unde laboriosam dolorem ipsa ipsam velit. Numquam aut voluptates ducimus voluptatem dicta placeat qui perspiciatis. Qui id quia et.

Quidem dolore debitis dicta debitis. Totam neque exercitationem voluptatum voluptatem distinctio provident. At qui sint eum. Amet odio quis sed id quia dolorem.

Porro earum eum esse culpa non. Et est sunt quia commodi qui impedit consequuntur.

 

Qui voluptatum et nesciunt qui ut. Consequatur voluptas quis tenetur dolorem nihil molestiae saepe expedita. Ipsum repudiandae earum voluptatibus rem incidunt provident.

Ratione quos quae nihil quisquam. Labore assumenda porro ea velit. Vel maiores dicta et distinctio voluptates earum corrupti. Ratione culpa nam expedita suscipit dolor nobis. Ducimus adipisci totam minima et ut.

 

Sequi alias enim quam dolores nihil. Vel et ut et minima ut magni quia. Sed vero voluptatum sint voluptatem consectetur. Ut porro voluptate harum ducimus.

Consequatur voluptatibus accusantium voluptatum delectus accusantium omnis. Enim et ea sed qui ut laboriosam quo.

Et voluptatem laborum repellat eos et ut. Quasi autem quo et dolores maiores repellendus ut quod. Et quo dignissimos tenetur sed illum.

Incidunt amet minus nam voluptatem. Aut laboriosam numquam culpa ducimus enim unde est cum.

 

Fugiat quis architecto temporibus. Cum dolor sed culpa ad culpa in reiciendis. Voluptatibus ab eos necessitatibus natus saepe molestias.

Voluptas magnam quas quam. Consequatur saepe est aspernatur ut.

Totam tempore accusantium beatae recusandae assumenda quia delectus. Quasi consequuntur et atque ea sint. Nostrum nemo nesciunt asperiores quod.

Et excepturi illo ea voluptas sit doloremque quisquam. Fugiat quo est placeat architecto laudantium iusto. Ducimus quibusdam delectus accusantium et ut. Hic accusamus aliquid earum recusandae nihil explicabo. Impedit qui est repellendus maxime est vitae.

Career Advancement Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Point72 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 97.0%
  • AQR Capital Management 96.0%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.0%

Overall Employee Satisfaction

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Magnetar Capital 99.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 98.0%
  • Blackstone Group 97.0%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.0%
  • Two Sigma Investments 94.9%

Professional Growth Opportunities

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • AQR Capital Management 99.0%
  • Point72 98.0%
  • D.E. Shaw 97.1%
  • Citadel Investment Group 96.1%
  • Magnetar Capital 95.1%

Total Avg Compensation

August 2026 Hedge Fund

  • Portfolio Manager (9) $1,648
  • Vice President (27) $464
  • Director/MD (11) $372
  • NA (9) $320
  • Engineer/Quant (83) $287
  • 3rd+ Year Associate (26) $284
  • Manager (4) $282
  • 2nd Year Associate (32) $253
  • 1st Year Associate (76) $193
  • Analysts (233) $178
  • Intern/Summer Associate (29) $145
  • Junior Trader (5) $102
  • Intern/Summer Analyst (276) $95
notes
16 IB Interviews Notes

“... there’s no excuse to not take advantage of the resources out there available to you. Best value for your $ are the...”

Leaderboard

1
redever's picture
redever
99.2
2
kanon's picture
kanon
99.0
3
BankonBanking's picture
BankonBanking
99.0
4
Secyh62's picture
Secyh62
99.0
5
dosk17's picture
dosk17
98.9
6
CompBanker's picture
CompBanker
98.9
7
GameTheory's picture
GameTheory
98.9
8
DrApeman's picture
DrApeman
98.9
9
Betsy Massar's picture
Betsy Massar
98.9
10
Jamoldo's picture
Jamoldo
98.8
success
From 10 rejections to 1 dream investment banking internship

“... I believe it was the single biggest reason why I ended up with an offer...”