Highest Ranked Comments In The Last Year

+1 Ok that's good to know. Would be for rowing so wondering if this still applies?  WSOBURNER69.
+1 lenoxhillrunner PrivateTechquity 🚀🚀🚀
+1 You’re right. There’s nothing more American than AI slop boomer Facebook images.  IsItREPE
+1 Stop spreading misinformation and misleading folks. First off, it took Fund IV +2 years to close and they didn't even hit their target. Not sure that's really loved by the "LP world". As for making (or losing) money: LionTreeTheNextGSTMT
+1 given the hilariously accelerated timelines being discussed (some banks are reportedly considering fall superdays, which could mean applications opening in late September or early October) I would not spend much time on cl Analyst 1 in IB - Gen
+1 Moelis is overrated as fuck. Associate 1 in IB-M&A
+1 It's like you didn't read my comment. The world is yours to grab by the balls. If you want some plan laid out in front of you with a checklist attached then go into banking and be a checklist slave the rest of your life. lake_michigan
+1 Based on the most helpful WSO content, your plan to join the Navy nuclear program and leverage that experience for a future in finance, particularly in infrastructure PE, is both ambitious and well-structured. WSO Monkey Bot
+1 CEO or regional head of a major firm pays well. Amusingly, at that point, you’re also essentially doing your own deals.  CRE
+1 That sucks buddy, location > job 9/10. Gotta put the lifestyle and personal happiness over the role unless you're actually calling shots somewhere  ILovePrivateEquity
+1 right... liberal arts Ivy students get these roles because of their "skills." Incoming Analyst in IB - Restr
+1 Is chicago banking overrated I feel like it seems like a stretch compared to other places man.  bestman222
+1 Here's how ABR stands on 2026 production - the securitized FNMA business in the 2nd image would overlap with the total volume in the 1st. Associate 2 in RE - Comm
+1 Holy shit, thats where they invented currency Spreadsheet Sasquatch
+1 "it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God" studentmonkey101
+1 See if you can get any intel from mutuals on the specific people you’re talking to. Analyst 3+ in Risk Mnmgt
+1 I was an athlete at an east coast LAC around 15 years ago. I always wondered why non-athletes went to these places. Not all that fun, in the middle of nowhere, shitty weather, expensive, etc. Director in S&T - FI
+1 Yeah, would probably agree with that sentiment. There's always the chance that this will be like '08 for TPG, and they do end up recovering, but I think that's impossible to underwrite as a junior. Associate 1 in PE - LBOs
+1 BWE announcement below. What do we think? Any news on who's picking up Lument?  Associate 3 in RE - Comm
+1 That is incredibly bizarre and I’d treat it as a culture red flag. FWIW the people I’ve known there were chill, and they’ve crushed it returns-wise. VP in PE - LBOs
+1 a couple data points across 500mm funds in T3 cities: all are 50/50 base to bonus split Associate 2 in PE - LBOs
+1 No. A 3.8 from Wharton, Harvard, or Yale isn't going to be the reason you get rejected. Adrian.
+1 I wouldn't attach a pitch to every cold email. Most people won't read a full write-up from someone they don't know. Adrian.
+1 Czechia, Poland, Slovakia, Estonia, Lithuania and Latvia all have a much higher quality of life than anywhere in the US or Western Europe. Keep coping mw1337
+1 I'd take it, assuming the fund has a legitimate investment process and a PM with a decent track record. Adrian.
+1 Definitely not too late, I've seen guys make the move in their 40s. Just keep trying. MMPM
+1 Please don’t be an idiot, man. Chase the opportunity. Too many wife-guys in this industry. Plenty of fish in the sea, but not as many opportunities. Associate 1 in PE - LBOs
+1 BBG actually wrote sth about this today, if that helps: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2 CollierV
+1 yes, having work Associate 1 in IB - Cov
+1 "why result in paying less?" - Well, I had a few successful pitches that made my PM money, but I did not get any acknowledgement - neither verbally nor through the bonus. whytho
+1 Recuited last summer and have been soft looking all year (NYC). Seems more active this year compared to past 3 years - tariff day pushed things out and 2023/2024 were silent. fdfdfdfd
+1 IsItREPEPokemon Master Pokemon Master
+1 Banana hammock Abusement Park
+1 . SmoothStripes
+1 For US M7 MBA by far.  For London the pre experience MiF path is much more common through schools like  HEC, LBS, LSE, ESCP, oxbridge, Bocconi and similar. Associate 2 in IB - Cov
+1 Do a top 15 MBA or nothing. MSF is effectively useless, as there is no real structured recruiting. Would be a very poor decision and put you right back where you started. VP in RE - Other
+1 Why would you even go back to IB? Have you never considered that there is a life outside of finance and working every weekends as a service provider on some shitty transactions?  Associate 2 in PE - Other
+1 Could you please explain why it would result in paying less and ability to advance career. Ideally an Analyst knows how well their position is performing and what the estimated position size is. Investment Analyst in HF - EquityHedge
+1 Question is, if you double EBITDA, how much debt do you need to do 3x MOIC. (This is based on IRR to MOIC given a 5yr hold). SOFRsoGood
+1 The peak exit is to move to a LCOL country once you reach your desired/necessary net worth and chill for the rest of your life playing GTA VI, not a HF. Pro Veritate
+1 Genuine question, couldn't you get to most distressed exits from A&M NACR if you actually prepped and networked a little + actually wanted to move? Analyst 1 in PE - Other
+1 this feels very off-market. My first year associate comp was  like 260k all-in (4 years ago) and our latest fund size at the time was just under 750 mil.  Associate 3 in PE - LBOs
+1 if the market was ripping, hiring would be ripping, yes, they're closely correlated.  But at the entry-level, I personally think the game as changed, irrespective of market conditions.   asmith_1
+1 You’re seeing more niche and independent ER outfits come up that monetize in different ways. acardboardmonkey
+1 jl12: Yeah...  swiss_monkey
+1 I get the sentiment, but I am also not of the belief that WE have to be the ones abandoning the great cities just because of the bottom 20% of society. JulianRobertson
+1 I’d say hold off until after ur first year. Pretty sure it’s only good for 2 years (that could be the other licensing exams) but the impact will stand out to recruiters more than clubs. seekinthealpha1
+1 It's possible but it really depends what other schools you're weighing it against. Stern alums will be focused on the tidal wave of Stern alumns emailing them. Associate 3 in IB-M&A
+1 Something worth remembering is that is likely not enforceable. If there is litigation, you'd likely win on the merits. Now, that doesn't mean a lawsuit would benefit you... jl12
+1 Most people: 50+ MD’s son: 1 ImagineSisyphusHappy
+1 It’s chill Prospect in IB - Gen
+1 Grizzled guy bumping this for those studying. EV is up 100 because you gained $100 in operating assets (the PP&E). Debt is up 100 because you issued 100 in debt. Associate 3 in PE - LBOs
+1 Unclear from OP's question if he's asking about leaving REPE or RE entirely.  If it's the latter, you better be ready to start at the bottom of whatever ladder you want to climb. asmith_1
+1 Nice people, very sharp seniors, and great training program, but super sweaty team as An or Asso Analyst 1 in IB-M&A
+1 As someone who has done a similar move from a European country I had no issues getting my partner the dependent visa, which seems even better than the skilled worker visa since it allows to move jobs without restrictions o Analyst 3+ in IB-M&A
+1 What type of bank are you at? BB, MM, EB? That will determine what kind of exit op you can get. Won’t lie PE is very similar to IB, and the WLB isn’t great. Same with MBB consulting. Analyst0910
+1 I think db reopens briefly in August Intern in IB - Gen
+1 All of the stuff about the hours, understaffing etc is pretty accurate; expect to log off at 2-3am M-F with weekend work most weeks. They churn juniors a lot. Analyst 1 in IB-M&A
+1 Good analysis. I would also argue the right contract depends on the maturity of the product. Hazel_Parkery
+1 RSM has one of the best value for money! I would go for it except if you have LBS/LSE or Oxford. Those really increase your chances the others less! boib_1
+1 I got your frustration, however, here I am - 10 yoe senior engineer looking to get into finance and trading, so whos wrong now? You or me? kalex
+1 When evaluating AI software development companies, don't focus only on the number of projects they have delivered. ramnarayanankarunakaran
+1 Are teams by sector in your experience?No, sector teams are mainly for performing and private credit teams. Although a few exceptions to the rule. chimpingaway
+1 Actually by the responses on this post, Associate 1 in PE - LBOs
+1 Sounds like they view your company as more SaaS than AI. The ZIRP multiples are never coming back big bro #RIP Amazon Prime
+1 I don’t know if joining the military is the best or most efficient way to break into high finance but good luck soldier Amazon Prime
+1 Know Parthenon has an office there and Trintum is a ~$1bn fund based in Austin. The largest firms in Austin are all tech investing in different flavors so not as ideal if not interested in tech. Vista is tech buyout. Analyst 1 in IB - Gen
+1 UBS baiscally had no women across at all levels and women are amongst the first to get laid off. Anti DEI if anything. Analyst 1 in IB - Gen
+1 I had a highly usual experience speaking with their team, which seemed more focused on socioeconomic background than actual experience. Associate 1 in PE - LBOs
+1 Not sure how this could be true, my understanding is that meals are expensed to whichever client analysts are staying in late for - at least that’s how it goes at my shop shmak
+1 waste_management_consultant JonnyDrama
+1 If you want the best of both worlds, go the paper trading route at a Tier 1 bank. Hanlon
+1 The H1B completely changes the game here. Do not try to re-recruit or rock the boat before day one—you have zero leverage right now, and handling a visa transfer during hasty off-cycle PE recruiting is a massive risk. Hanlon
+1 Yeah some banks don’t ask for transcript, some don’t even verify. But a lot of these background checks will handle the verifications if I’m not mistaken. Analyst 1 in IB-M&A
+1 tbh with AI already here and only getting better, it'd be much better to stick with nuclear in the long term. the chances of many jobs in finance getting eliminated is pretty high lol.  Sup_Bro23
+1 I would put Hg on the list. >100B AUM European software buyout firm; they have office in NYC and SFFunds have been increasing. Analyst 2 in IB-M&A
+1 Also jsut want to say cd&r associate class is an actual army. 20+ people a class - unheard of anywhere else. Analyst 2 in IB-M&A
+1 You should do what you want with no regard for the HH. You don’t owe them anything whatsoever. Amazon Prime
+1 I agree with APO (if you don’t end up quitting) TB Vista. Analyst 2 in IB-M&A
+1 In a middle-level distressed investing role and most of our best hires came from workout-focused roles rather than IB. Associate 1 in Private Credit
+1 wuandale33Prob LO AM but those seats require CFA+MBA and are really rare. longlong
+1 I was in your shoes last year. Recruited through summer and really struggled, the only thing you can do is keep your head down and keep connections warm. Prospect in IB - Gen
+1 If rising sophomore at target school, you should be able to transfer to school within t30 despite shit GPA. That gives you a GPA reset. You will then delay grad date to December of 2029 and recruit next year. Intern in IB - Gen
+1 congrats on britehorn retard jewslayer1944
+1 Any ideas on what the interview process / case study looks like? Anonymus21
+1 Survivorship bias is a thing. The question didn't specify just finance though even just limiting it to that universe you're wrong, but that's ok prospect.  PrivateTechquity 🚀🚀🚀
+1 Rsm isn't really a target in London. If you have an IB internship and a consulting one already then just do lse/lbs or similar. You'll have much higher chances this way in landing a London role Intern in IB-M&A
+1 orked with a few of these, and the biggest bottleneck is always compliance speed. GT and Stonehaven are massive, which sometimes means 5-10 day turnarounds. For independent dealmakers, that speed kills deals. jasper.thorne1
+1 if you are asso and want to stay in banking long term then sure, but for analysts who are going to buyside, no need to grind at all and anybody say have to is harming you in the long term. Intern in IB - Gen
+1 Very helpful. Would you say going to work for a Marriott or Hilton would not be a good move for a career in Hotel development? Analyst 1 in RE - Other
+1 For a standard 10 week summer internship I would say don't attempt to take a single day off unless absolutely necessary (and I am the kind of person who has used 100% of their PTO starting from Analyst 1). lolusernames
+1 This is so not true, international can still say no and slack if they are analyst and leave after 2 years of banking since laying off anyone will need to pay them 6-7 months of salary - I am an international w green card a Intern in IB - Gen
+1 Personally I avoid the topic altogether. johnny-mnemonic
+1 Assuming funds will start increasing the weight of your performance in an in-person debrief when making decisions on candidates Analyst 1 in PE - LBOs
+1 headhunter i spoke to recommended to do PE before i try to pivot to a HF bc many firms still require PE experience. baka
+1 London is a fun idea, but it's just not realistic as a Canadian unless you:  A) grew up in the UK/Europe, went to school there, and ideally have connections back home or  Analyst 2 in IB - Gen
+1 Attend a LAC and had great success in my recruitment process feel free to PM me AdviceMonkey10
+1 Reasonable things to want in life mate, good luck! Analyst 3+ in IB - Cov
+1 This is a valid point. Makes me want to save up enough money that I can: Principal in PE - LBOs
+1 I’ve seen this before. Generally I think it’s really dumb. it’s a bad sign since it signals lack of teamwork or trust. And it’s not efficientleaving you guessing and feeling like you’re on the outside investor45